summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c100
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 4c90c07d8c39..09e9b88110d1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -3,62 +3,75 @@
* Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
*/
-#include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
-static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
- struct device_node *node,
- enum cache_type type, unsigned int level)
+static struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *rv_cache_ops;
+
+void riscv_set_cacheinfo_ops(struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *ops)
{
- this_leaf->level = level;
- this_leaf->type = type;
+ rv_cache_ops = ops;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_set_cacheinfo_ops);
-static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
+const struct attribute_group *
+cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
{
- struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
- struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
- struct device_node *prev = NULL;
- int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level;
+ if (rv_cache_ops && rv_cache_ops->get_priv_group)
+ return rv_cache_ops->get_priv_group(this_leaf);
+ return NULL;
+}
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (leaves > 0)
- levels = 1;
+static struct cacheinfo *get_cacheinfo(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+ /*
+ * Using raw_smp_processor_id() elides a preemptability check, but this
+ * is really indicative of a larger problem: the cacheinfo UABI assumes
+ * that cores have a homonogenous view of the cache hierarchy. That
+ * happens to be the case for the current set of RISC-V systems, but
+ * likely won't be true in general. Since there's no way to provide
+ * correct information for these systems via the current UABI we're
+ * just eliding the check for now.
+ */
+ struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(raw_smp_processor_id());
+ struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
+ int index;
- prev = np;
- while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) {
- of_node_put(prev);
- prev = np;
- if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache"))
- break;
- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level))
- break;
- if (level <= levels)
- break;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- levels = level;
+ for (index = 0; index < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; index++) {
+ this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+ if (this_leaf->level == level && this_leaf->type == type)
+ return this_leaf;
}
- of_node_put(np);
- this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels;
- this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = leaves;
+ return NULL;
+}
- return 0;
+uintptr_t get_cache_size(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+ struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = get_cacheinfo(level, type);
+
+ return this_leaf ? this_leaf->size : 0;
}
-static int __populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
+uintptr_t get_cache_geometry(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+ struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = get_cacheinfo(level, type);
+
+ return this_leaf ? (this_leaf->ways_of_associativity << 16 |
+ this_leaf->coherency_line_size) :
+ 0;
+}
+
+static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
+ struct device_node *node,
+ enum cache_type type, unsigned int level)
+{
+ this_leaf->level = level;
+ this_leaf->type = type;
+}
+
+int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
@@ -95,6 +108,3 @@ static int __populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-
-DEFINE_SMP_CALL_CACHE_FUNCTION(init_cache_level)
-DEFINE_SMP_CALL_CACHE_FUNCTION(populate_cache_leaves)