diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 68 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 1eddb713b815..339c8a1371de 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -463,19 +463,22 @@ static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = { BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5 }; +static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +{ + BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG); + + memset(®s[regno], 0, sizeof(regs[regno])); + regs[regno].type = NOT_INIT; + regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; +} + static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { - regs[i].type = NOT_INIT; - regs[i].imm = 0; - regs[i].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - regs[i].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - regs[i].min_align = 0; - regs[i].aux_off = 0; - regs[i].aux_off_align = 0; - } + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, i); /* frame pointer */ regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = FRAME_PTR; @@ -808,11 +811,15 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, reg_off += reg->aux_off; } - /* skb->data is NET_IP_ALIGN-ed, but for strict alignment checking - * we force this to 2 which is universally what architectures use - * when they don't set CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. + /* For platforms that do not have a Kconfig enabling + * CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS the value of + * NET_IP_ALIGN is universally set to '2'. And on platforms + * that do set CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, we get + * to this code only in strict mode where we want to emulate + * the NET_IP_ALIGN==2 checking. Therefore use an + * unconditional IP align value of '2'. */ - ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN; + ip_align = 2; if ((ip_align + reg_off + off) % size != 0) { verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n", ip_align, reg_off, off, size); @@ -839,9 +846,6 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, { bool strict = env->strict_alignment; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) - strict = true; - switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict); @@ -1345,7 +1349,6 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; bool changes_data; int i, err; @@ -1412,11 +1415,8 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) } /* reset caller saved regs */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { - reg = regs + caller_saved[i]; - reg->type = NOT_INIT; - reg->imm = 0; - } + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); /* update return register */ if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) { @@ -2444,7 +2444,6 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code); - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; int i, err; if (!may_access_skb(env->prog->type)) { @@ -2477,11 +2476,8 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { - reg = regs + caller_saved[i]; - reg->type = NOT_INIT; - reg->imm = 0; - } + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); /* mark destination R0 register as readable, since it contains * the value fetched from the packet @@ -2692,7 +2688,8 @@ err_free: /* the following conditions reduce the number of explored insns * from ~140k to ~80k for ultra large programs that use a lot of ptr_to_packet */ -static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_reg_state *old, +static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *old, struct bpf_reg_state *cur) { if (old->id != cur->id) @@ -2735,7 +2732,7 @@ static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_reg_state *old, * 'if (R4 > data_end)' and all further insn were already good with r=20, * so they will be good with r=30 and we can prune the search. */ - if (old->off <= cur->off && + if (!env->strict_alignment && old->off <= cur->off && old->off >= old->range && cur->off >= cur->range) return true; @@ -2806,7 +2803,7 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, continue; if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && - compare_ptrs_to_packet(rold, rcur)) + compare_ptrs_to_packet(env, rold, rcur)) continue; return false; @@ -3584,10 +3581,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) } else { log_level = 0; } - if (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT) + + env->strict_alignment = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) env->strict_alignment = true; - else - env->strict_alignment = false; ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env); if (ret < 0) @@ -3693,7 +3690,10 @@ int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); log_level = 0; + env->strict_alignment = false; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + env->strict_alignment = true; env->explored_states = kcalloc(env->prog->len, sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list *), |