diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/rtmutex.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 1633 |
1 files changed, 796 insertions, 837 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index cfdd5b93264d..4a8df1800cbb 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -8,20 +8,62 @@ * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com> * Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt * Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen + * Adaptive Spinlocks: + * Copyright (C) 2008 Novell, Inc., Gregory Haskins, Sven Dietrich, + * and Peter Morreale, + * Adaptive Spinlocks simplification: + * Copyright (C) 2008 Red Hat, Inc., Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> * * See Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.rst for details. */ -#include <linux/spinlock.h> -#include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> +#include <linux/sched/deadline.h> #include <linux/sched/signal.h> #include <linux/sched/rt.h> -#include <linux/sched/deadline.h> #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h> -#include <linux/sched/debug.h> -#include <linux/timer.h> +#include <linux/ww_mutex.h> + +#include <trace/events/lock.h> #include "rtmutex_common.h" +#ifndef WW_RT +# define build_ww_mutex() (false) +# define ww_container_of(rtm) NULL + +static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) +{ +} + +static inline void ww_mutex_lock_acquired(struct ww_mutex *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +{ +} + +static inline int __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +{ + return 0; +} + +#else +# define build_ww_mutex() (true) +# define ww_container_of(rtm) container_of(rtm, struct ww_mutex, base) +# include "ww_mutex.h" +#endif + /* * lock->owner state tracking: * @@ -49,24 +91,41 @@ * set this bit before looking at the lock. */ -static void -rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) +static __always_inline struct task_struct * +rt_mutex_owner_encode(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner) { unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner; if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; - WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, (struct task_struct *)val); + return (struct task_struct *)val; +} + +static __always_inline void +rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner) +{ + /* + * lock->wait_lock is held but explicit acquire semantics are needed + * for a new lock owner so WRITE_ONCE is insufficient. + */ + xchg_acquire(&lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, owner)); +} + +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_clear_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + /* lock->wait_lock is held so the unlock provides release semantics. */ + WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, NULL)); } -static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); } -static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static __always_inline void +fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, bool acquire_lock) { unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; @@ -132,8 +191,21 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) * still set. */ owner = READ_ONCE(*p); - if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) - WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) { + /* + * See rt_mutex_set_owner() and rt_mutex_clear_owner() on + * why xchg_acquire() is used for updating owner for + * locking and WRITE_ONCE() for unlocking. + * + * WRITE_ONCE() would work for the acquire case too, but + * in case that the lock acquisition failed it might + * force other lockers into the slow path unnecessarily. + */ + if (acquire_lock) + xchg_acquire(p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + else + WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + } } /* @@ -141,22 +213,46 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) * set up. */ #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_acquire(&l->owner, c, n) == c) -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_release(&l->owner, c, n) == c) +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *old, + struct task_struct *new) +{ + return try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->owner, &old, new); +} + +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current); +} + +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *old, + struct task_struct *new) +{ + return try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->owner, &old, new); +} /* * Callers must hold the ->wait_lock -- which is the whole purpose as we force * all future threads that attempt to [Rmw] the lock to the slowpath. As such * relaxed semantics suffice. */ -static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { - unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; + unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; + unsigned long owner, new; + owner = READ_ONCE(*p); do { - owner = *p; - } while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner, - owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); + new = owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; + } while (!try_cmpxchg_relaxed(p, &owner, new)); + + /* + * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE + * operations in the event of contention. Ensure the successful + * cmpxchg is visible. + */ + smp_mb__after_atomic(); } /* @@ -165,8 +261,8 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) * 2) Drop lock->wait_lock * 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg */ -static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock, - unsigned long flags) +static __always_inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + unsigned long flags) __releases(lock->wait_lock) { struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); @@ -201,10 +297,36 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock, } #else -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (0) -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (0) +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *old, + struct task_struct *new) +{ + return false; + +} -static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock); + +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + /* + * With debug enabled rt_mutex_cmpxchg trylock() will always fail. + * + * Avoid unconditionally taking the slow path by using + * rt_mutex_slow_trylock() which is covered by the debug code and can + * acquire a non-contended rtmutex. + */ + return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); +} + +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *old, + struct task_struct *new) +{ + return false; +} + +static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); @@ -213,8 +335,8 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) /* * Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock. */ -static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock, - unsigned long flags) +static __always_inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + unsigned long flags) __releases(lock->wait_lock) { lock->owner = NULL; @@ -223,15 +345,53 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock, } #endif +static __always_inline int __waiter_prio(struct task_struct *task) +{ + int prio = task->prio; + + if (!rt_or_dl_prio(prio)) + return DEFAULT_PRIO; + + return prio; +} + +/* + * Update the waiter->tree copy of the sort keys. + */ +static __always_inline void +waiter_update_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)); + + waiter->tree.prio = __waiter_prio(task); + waiter->tree.deadline = task->dl.deadline; +} + +/* + * Update the waiter->pi_tree copy of the sort keys (from the tree copy). + */ +static __always_inline void +waiter_clone_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); + lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)); + + waiter->pi_tree.prio = waiter->tree.prio; + waiter->pi_tree.deadline = waiter->tree.deadline; +} + /* - * Only use with rt_mutex_waiter_{less,equal}() + * Only use with rt_waiter_node_{less,equal}() */ +#define task_to_waiter_node(p) \ + &(struct rt_waiter_node){ .prio = __waiter_prio(p), .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline } #define task_to_waiter(p) \ - &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .prio = (p)->prio, .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline } + &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .tree = *task_to_waiter_node(p) } -static inline int -rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *right) +static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_less(struct rt_waiter_node *left, + struct rt_waiter_node *right) { if (left->prio < right->prio) return 1; @@ -248,9 +408,8 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, return 0; } -static inline int -rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *right) +static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_equal(struct rt_waiter_node *left, + struct rt_waiter_node *right) { if (left->prio != right->prio) return 0; @@ -267,76 +426,110 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, return 1; } -static void -rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +static inline bool rt_mutex_steal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter) { - struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_root.rb_node; - struct rb_node *parent = NULL; - struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry; - bool leftmost = true; - - while (*link) { - parent = *link; - entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); - if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) { - link = &parent->rb_left; - } else { - link = &parent->rb_right; - leftmost = false; - } + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&waiter->tree, &top_waiter->tree)) + return true; + +#ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS + /* + * Note that RT tasks are excluded from same priority (lateral) + * steals to prevent the introduction of an unbounded latency. + */ + if (rt_or_dl_prio(waiter->tree.prio)) + return false; + + return rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, &top_waiter->tree); +#else + return false; +#endif +} + +#define __node_2_waiter(node) \ + rb_entry((node), struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry) + +static __always_inline bool __waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter *aw = __node_2_waiter(a); + struct rt_mutex_waiter *bw = __node_2_waiter(b); + + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&aw->tree, &bw->tree)) + return 1; + + if (!build_ww_mutex()) + return 0; + + if (rt_waiter_node_less(&bw->tree, &aw->tree)) + return 0; + + /* NOTE: relies on waiter->ww_ctx being set before insertion */ + if (aw->ww_ctx) { + if (!bw->ww_ctx) + return 1; + + return (signed long)(aw->ww_ctx->stamp - + bw->ww_ctx->stamp) < 0; } - rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link); - rb_insert_color_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters, leftmost); + return 0; +} + +static __always_inline void +rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + + rb_add_cached(&waiter->tree.entry, &lock->waiters, __waiter_less); } -static void -rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +static __always_inline void +rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry)) + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)) return; - rb_erase_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); + rb_erase_cached(&waiter->tree.entry, &lock->waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry); } -static void +#define __node_2_rt_node(node) \ + rb_entry((node), struct rt_waiter_node, entry) + +static __always_inline bool __pi_waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) +{ + return rt_waiter_node_less(__node_2_rt_node(a), __node_2_rt_node(b)); +} + +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_root.rb_node; - struct rb_node *parent = NULL; - struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry; - bool leftmost = true; - - while (*link) { - parent = *link; - entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry); - if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) { - link = &parent->rb_left; - } else { - link = &parent->rb_right; - leftmost = false; - } - } + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); - rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link); - rb_insert_color_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters, leftmost); + rb_add_cached(&waiter->pi_tree.entry, &task->pi_waiters, __pi_waiter_less); } -static void +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry)) + lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); + + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)) return; - rb_erase_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); + rb_erase_cached(&waiter->pi_tree.entry, &task->pi_waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry); } -static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p) +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct task_struct *p) { struct task_struct *pi_task = NULL; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + lockdep_assert(rt_mutex_owner(lock) == p); lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); if (task_has_pi_waiters(p)) @@ -345,6 +538,42 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p) rt_mutex_setprio(p, pi_task); } +/* RT mutex specific wake_q wrappers */ +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, + struct task_struct *task, + unsigned int wake_state) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wake_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) + WARN_ON_ONCE(wqh->rtlock_task); + get_task_struct(task); + wqh->rtlock_task = task; + } else { + wake_q_add(&wqh->head, task); + } +} + +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +{ + rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(wqh, w->task, w->wake_state); +} + +static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_up_q(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wqh->rtlock_task) { + wake_up_state(wqh->rtlock_task, TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT); + put_task_struct(wqh->rtlock_task); + wqh->rtlock_task = NULL; + } + + if (!wake_q_empty(&wqh->head)) + wake_up_q(&wqh->head); + + /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */ + preempt_enable(); +} + /* * Deadlock detection is conditional: * @@ -358,25 +587,16 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p) * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument * and the config settings. */ -static bool rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) +static __always_inline bool +rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) { - /* - * This is just a wrapper function for the following call, - * because debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock() smells like a magic - * debug feature and I wanted to keep the cond function in the - * main source file along with the comments instead of having - * two of the same in the headers. - */ - return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES)) + return waiter != NULL; + return chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK; } -/* - * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain: - */ -int max_lock_depth = 1024; - -static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) +static __always_inline struct rt_mutex_base *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) { return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL; } @@ -405,9 +625,14 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) * Chain walk basics and protection scope * * [R] refcount on task - * [P] task->pi_lock held + * [Pn] task->pi_lock held * [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held * + * Normal locking order: + * + * rtmutex->wait_lock + * task->pi_lock + * * Step Description Protected by * function arguments: * @task [R] @@ -422,39 +647,44 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) * again: * loop_sanity_check(); * retry: - * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P] - * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P] - * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P] - * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P] - * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P] try to acquire [L] - * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P1] + * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P1] + * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P1] + * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P1] + * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P1] try to acquire [L] + * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P1] * goto retry; * } - * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P] + [L] - * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P] + [L] - * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P1] + [L] + * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P1] + [L] + * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P1] * put_task_struct(task); release [R] * [9] check_exit_conditions_3(); [L] * [10] task = owner(lock); [L] * get_task_struct(task); [L] acquire [R] - * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P] - * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P] + [L] - * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P] + [L] - * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P2] + * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P2] + [L] + * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P2] + [L] + * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P2] * unlock(lock->wait_lock); release [L] * goto again; + * + * Where P1 is the blocking task and P2 is the lock owner; going up one step + * the owner becomes the next blocked task etc.. + * +* */ -static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, - struct rt_mutex *orig_lock, - struct rt_mutex *next_lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter, - struct task_struct *top_task) +static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + struct rt_mutex_base *orig_lock, + struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter, + struct task_struct *top_task) { struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter; struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter; int ret = 0, depth = 0; - struct rt_mutex *lock; + struct rt_mutex_base *lock; bool detect_deadlock; bool requeue = true; @@ -537,6 +767,31 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, goto out_unlock_pi; /* + * There could be 'spurious' loops in the lock graph due to ww_mutex, + * consider: + * + * P1: A, ww_A, ww_B + * P2: ww_B, ww_A + * P3: A + * + * P3 should not return -EDEADLK because it gets trapped in the cycle + * created by P1 and P2 (which will resolve -- and runs into + * max_lock_depth above). Therefore disable detect_deadlock such that + * the below termination condition can trigger once all relevant tasks + * are boosted. + * + * Even when we start with ww_mutex we can disable deadlock detection, + * since we would supress a ww_mutex induced deadlock at [6] anyway. + * Supressing it here however is not sufficient since we might still + * hit [6] due to adjustment driven iteration. + * + * NOTE: if someone were to create a deadlock between 2 ww_classes we'd + * utterly fail to report it; lockdep should. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && waiter->ww_ctx && detect_deadlock) + detect_deadlock = false; + + /* * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note, * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting * mode! @@ -565,7 +820,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain * walk. */ - if (rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) { + if (rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, task_to_waiter_node(task))) { if (!detect_deadlock) goto out_unlock_pi; else @@ -573,13 +828,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, } /* - * [4] Get the next lock + * [4] Get the next lock; per holding task->pi_lock we can't unblock + * and guarantee @lock's existence. */ lock = waiter->lock; /* * [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock, * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex * operations. + * + * Per the above, holding task->pi_lock guarantees lock exists, so + * inverting this lock order is infeasible from a life-time + * perspective. */ if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); @@ -597,9 +857,21 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * walk, we detected a deadlock. */ if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { - debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock); - raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); ret = -EDEADLK; + + /* + * When the deadlock is due to ww_mutex; also see above. Don't + * report the deadlock and instead let the ww_mutex wound/die + * logic pick which of the contending threads gets -EDEADLK. + * + * NOTE: assumes the cycle only contains a single ww_class; any + * other configuration and we fail to report; also, see + * lockdep. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && orig_waiter && orig_waiter->ww_ctx) + ret = 0; + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); goto out_unlock_pi; } @@ -671,18 +943,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * or * * DL CBS enforcement advancing the effective deadline. - * - * Even though pi_waiters also uses these fields, and that tree is only - * updated in [11], we can do this here, since we hold [L], which - * serializes all pi_waiters access and rb_erase() does not care about - * the values of the node being removed. */ - waiter->prio = task->prio; - waiter->deadline = task->dl.deadline; + waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); - /* [8] Release the task */ + /* + * [8] Release the (blocking) task in preparation for + * taking the owner task in [10]. + * + * Since we hold lock->waiter_lock, task cannot unblock, even if we + * release task->pi_lock. + */ raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); put_task_struct(task); @@ -699,13 +971,19 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try * to get the lock. */ - if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) - wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task); + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + if (prerequeue_top_waiter != top_waiter) + wake_up_state(top_waiter->task, top_waiter->wake_state); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); return 0; } - /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */ + /* + * [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock + * + * Per holding lock->wait_lock and checking for !owner above, there + * must be an owner and it cannot go away. + */ task = get_task_struct(rt_mutex_owner(lock)); raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); @@ -718,13 +996,14 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * and adjust the priority of the owner. */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, task); } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) { /* * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock, but is - * no longer the top prority waiter. Replace waiter in + * no longer the top priority waiter. Replace waiter in * the owner tasks pi waiters tree with the new top * (highest priority) waiter and adjust the priority * of the owner. @@ -734,8 +1013,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter); waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, task); } else { /* * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority @@ -802,8 +1082,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * @waiter: The waiter that is queued to the lock's wait tree if the * callsite called task_blocked_on_lock(), otherwise NULL */ -static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +static int __sched +try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *task, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -838,19 +1119,21 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task, * trylock attempt. */ if (waiter) { - /* - * If waiter is not the highest priority waiter of - * @lock, give up. - */ - if (waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) - return 0; + struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); /* - * We can acquire the lock. Remove the waiter from the - * lock waiters tree. + * If waiter is the highest priority waiter of @lock, + * or allowed to steal it, take it over. */ - rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); - + if (waiter == top_waiter || rt_mutex_steal(waiter, top_waiter)) { + /* + * We can acquire the lock. Remove the waiter from the + * lock waiters tree. + */ + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + } else { + return 0; + } } else { /* * If the lock has waiters already we check whether @task is @@ -861,13 +1144,9 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task, * not need to be dequeued. */ if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { - /* - * If @task->prio is greater than or equal to - * the top waiter priority (kernel view), - * @task lost. - */ - if (!rt_mutex_waiter_less(task_to_waiter(task), - rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))) + /* Check whether the trylock can steal it. */ + if (!rt_mutex_steal(task_to_waiter(task), + rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))) return 0; /* @@ -904,9 +1183,6 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task, raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); takeit: - /* We got the lock. */ - debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock); - /* * This either preserves the RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit if there * are still waiters or clears it. @@ -923,14 +1199,16 @@ takeit: * * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled */ -static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct task_struct *task, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) +static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter; - struct rt_mutex *next_lock; + struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock; int chain_walk = 0, res; lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -943,15 +1221,18 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK, * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock * situation. + * + * Except for ww_mutex, in that case the chain walk must already deal + * with spurious cycles, see the comments at [3] and [6]. */ - if (owner == task) + if (owner == task && !(build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx)) return -EDEADLK; raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); waiter->task = task; waiter->lock = lock; - waiter->prio = task->prio; - waiter->deadline = task->dl.deadline; + waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); + waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) @@ -962,6 +1243,21 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); + if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { + struct rt_mutex *rtm; + + /* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */ + rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); + res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); + if (res) { + raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + task->pi_blocked_on = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); + return res; + } + } + if (!owner) return 0; @@ -970,7 +1266,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter); rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, owner); if (owner->pi_blocked_on) chain_walk = 1; } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) { @@ -996,7 +1292,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, */ get_task_struct(owner); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&lock->wait_lock, wake_q); res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock, next_lock, waiter, task); @@ -1012,11 +1308,13 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, * * Called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. */ -static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, - struct rt_mutex *lock) +static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, + struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); @@ -1029,7 +1327,7 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, * task unblocks. */ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter); - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, current); /* * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays @@ -1049,244 +1347,14 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, * deboost but before waking our donor task, hence the preempt_disable() * before unlock. * - * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_postunlock(); + * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_wake_up_q(); */ preempt_disable(); - wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); + rt_mutex_wake_q_add(wqh, waiter); raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); } -/* - * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up - * - * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. I must - * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex(). - */ -static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) -{ - bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); - struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); - struct rt_mutex *next_lock; - - lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); - - raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); - rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); - current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; - raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); - - /* - * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority - * waiter of the lock and there is an owner to update. - */ - if (!owner || !is_top_waiter) - return; - - raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock); - - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter); - - if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) - rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); - - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); - - /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ - next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); - - raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock); - - /* - * Don't walk the chain, if the owner task is not blocked - * itself. - */ - if (!next_lock) - return; - - /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ - get_task_struct(owner); - - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - - rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock, - next_lock, NULL, current); - - raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); -} - -/* - * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting - * - * Called from sched_setscheduler - */ -void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) -{ - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; - struct rt_mutex *next_lock; - unsigned long flags; - - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); - - waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; - if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) { - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); - return; - } - next_lock = waiter->lock; - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); - - /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ - get_task_struct(task); - - rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL, - next_lock, NULL, task); -} - -void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) -{ - debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); - waiter->task = NULL; -} - -/** - * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop - * @lock: the rt_mutex to take - * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE - * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) - * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none - * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter - * - * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled - */ -static int __sched -__rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) -{ - int ret = 0; - - for (;;) { - /* Try to acquire the lock: */ - if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter)) - break; - - /* - * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and - * timeout. Ignored otherwise. - */ - if (likely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) { - /* Signal pending? */ - if (signal_pending(current)) - ret = -EINTR; - if (timeout && !timeout->task) - ret = -ETIMEDOUT; - if (ret) - break; - } - - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - - debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); - - schedule(); - - raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - set_current_state(state); - } - - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - return ret; -} - -static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) -{ - /* - * If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested - * deadlock detection, nothing to do here. - */ - if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock) - return; - - /* - * Yell lowdly and stop the task right here. - */ - rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w); - while (1) { - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule(); - } -} - -/* - * Slow path lock function: - */ -static int __sched -rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) -{ - struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; - unsigned long flags; - int ret = 0; - - rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); - - /* - * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can - * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled - * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the - * rtmutex with lock->wait_lock held. But we cannot unconditionally - * enable interrupts in that early boot case. So we need to use the - * irqsave/restore variants. - */ - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - - /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ - if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - return 0; - } - - set_current_state(state); - - /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */ - if (unlikely(timeout)) - hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); - - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk); - - if (likely(!ret)) - /* sleep on the mutex */ - ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter); - - if (unlikely(ret)) { - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); - rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter); - } - - /* - * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit - * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. - */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - - /* Remove pending timer: */ - if (unlikely(timeout)) - hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer); - - debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); - - return ret; -} - -static inline int __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { int ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL); @@ -1294,7 +1362,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit * unconditionally. Clean this up. */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); return ret; } @@ -1302,7 +1370,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) /* * Slow path try-lock function: */ -static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { unsigned long flags; int ret; @@ -1328,14 +1396,20 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) return ret; } +static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) + return 1; + + return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); +} + /* * Slow path to release a rt-mutex. - * - * Return whether the current task needs to call rt_mutex_postunlock(). */ -static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct wake_q_head *wake_q) +static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { + DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); unsigned long flags; /* irqsave required to support early boot calls */ @@ -1377,7 +1451,7 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { /* Drops lock->wait_lock ! */ if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock, flags) == true) - return false; + return; /* Relock the rtmutex and try again */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); } @@ -1388,534 +1462,419 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, * * Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock. */ - mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock); + mark_wakeup_next_waiter(&wqh, lock); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - return true; /* call rt_mutex_postunlock() */ + rt_mutex_wake_up_q(&wqh); } -/* - * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock - * - * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the - * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled. - */ -static inline int -rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) +static __always_inline void __rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) - return 0; + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) + return; - return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK); + rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock); } -static inline int -rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, - int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *owner) { - if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK && - likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) - return 0; + bool res = true; - return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk); + rcu_read_lock(); + for (;;) { + /* If owner changed, trylock again. */ + if (owner != rt_mutex_owner(lock)) + break; + /* + * Ensure that @owner is dereferenced after checking that + * the lock owner still matches @owner. If that fails, + * @owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches, + * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid. + */ + barrier(); + /* + * Stop spinning when: + * - the lock owner has been scheduled out + * - current is not longer the top waiter + * - current is requested to reschedule (redundant + * for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y) + * - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted + */ + if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() || + !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) { + res = false; + break; + } + cpu_relax(); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + return res; } - -static inline int -rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) +#else +static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *owner) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) - return 1; - - return slowfn(lock); + return false; } +#endif +#ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX /* - * Performs the wakeup of the the top-waiter and re-enables preemption. + * Functions required for: + * - rtmutex, futex on all kernels + * - mutex and rwsem substitutions on RT kernels */ -void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q) + +/* + * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up + * + * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. It must + * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex(). + */ +static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) { - wake_up_q(wake_q); + bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); + struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock; - /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */ - preempt_enable(); -} + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); -static inline void -rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct wake_q_head *wqh)) -{ - DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) + /* + * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority + * waiter of the lock and there is an owner to update. + */ + if (!owner || !is_top_waiter) return; - if (slowfn(lock, &wake_q)) - rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q); -} - -static inline void __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass) -{ - might_sleep(); + raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock); - mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_); - rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock); -} + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter); -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC -/** - * rt_mutex_lock_nested - lock a rt_mutex - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * @subclass: the lockdep subclass - */ -void __sched rt_mutex_lock_nested(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass) -{ - __rt_mutex_lock(lock, subclass); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_nested); + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); -#else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, owner); -/** - * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - */ -void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - __rt_mutex_lock(lock, 0); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock); -#endif + /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ + next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); -/** - * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * - * Returns: - * 0 on success - * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal - */ -int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - int ret; + raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock); - might_sleep(); + /* + * Don't walk the chain, if the owner task is not blocked + * itself. + */ + if (!next_lock) + return; - mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); - ret = rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock); - if (ret) - mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_); + /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ + get_task_struct(owner); - return ret; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); -/* - * Futex variant, must not use fastpath. - */ -int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); -} + rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock, + next_lock, NULL, current); -int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - return __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); } /** - * rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible - * the timeout structure is provided - * by the caller - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout) + * rt_mutex_slowlock_block() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop + * @lock: the rt_mutex to take + * @ww_ctx: WW mutex context pointer + * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE + * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) + * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * @wake_q: wake_q of tasks to wake when we drop the lock->wait_lock * - * Returns: - * 0 on success - * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal - * -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired + * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled */ -int -rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout) +static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + unsigned int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) + __releases(&lock->wait_lock) __acquires(&lock->wait_lock) { - int ret; + struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); + struct task_struct *owner; + int ret = 0; - might_sleep(); + for (;;) { + /* Try to acquire the lock: */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter)) + break; - mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); - ret = rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, - RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, - rt_mutex_slowlock); - if (ret) - mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_); + if (timeout && !timeout->task) { + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + break; + } + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) { + ret = -EINTR; + break; + } - return ret; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock); + if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { + ret = __ww_mutex_check_kill(rtm, waiter, ww_ctx); + if (ret) + break; + } -/** - * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * - * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to - * call it from atomic regions, but not from hard interrupt or soft - * interrupt context. - * - * Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention - */ -int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - int ret; + if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) + owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + else + owner = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&lock->wait_lock, wake_q); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || in_nmi() || in_serving_softirq())) - return 0; + if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, waiter, owner)) + rt_mutex_schedule(); - ret = rt_mutex_fasttrylock(lock, rt_mutex_slowtrylock); - if (ret) - mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + set_current_state(state); + } + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock); -/** - * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked - */ -void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, + struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) { - mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_); - rt_mutex_fastunlock(lock, rt_mutex_slowunlock); + /* + * If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested + * deadlock detection, nothing to do here. + */ + if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock) + return; + + if (build_ww_mutex() && w->ww_ctx) + return; + + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + + WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n"); + + while (1) { + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + rt_mutex_schedule(); + } } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock); /** - * Futex variant, that since futex variants do not use the fast-path, can be - * simple and will not need to retry. + * __rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked with lock::wait_lock held + * @lock: The rtmutex to block lock + * @ww_ctx: WW mutex context pointer + * @state: The task state for sleeping + * @chwalk: Indicator whether full or partial chainwalk is requested + * @waiter: Initializer waiter for blocking + * @wake_q: The wake_q to wake tasks after we release the wait_lock */ -bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct wake_q_head *wake_q) +static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + unsigned int state, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { + struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); + struct ww_mutex *ww = ww_container_of(rtm); + int ret; + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); - debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock); + /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { + if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); + ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); + } + return 0; + } - if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { - lock->owner = NULL; - return false; /* done */ + set_current_state(state); + + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); + + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk, wake_q); + if (likely(!ret)) + ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter, wake_q); + + if (likely(!ret)) { + /* acquired the lock */ + if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { + if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); + ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); + } + } else { + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, lock, waiter); } /* - * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will - * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to - * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup. preempt_disable() - * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock(). + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit + * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. */ - mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); + + trace_contention_end(lock, ret); - return true; /* call postunlock() */ + return ret; } -void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + unsigned int state, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { - DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); - unsigned long flags; - bool postunlock; + struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; + int ret; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); + waiter.ww_ctx = ww_ctx; - if (postunlock) - rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q); -} + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, ww_ctx, state, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, + &waiter, wake_q); -/** - * rt_mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable - * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed - * - * This function marks the mutex uninitialized, and any subsequent - * use of the mutex is forbidden. The mutex must not be locked when - * this function is called. - */ -void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock)); -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES - lock->magic = NULL; -#endif + debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); + return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy); -/** - * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock - * - * @lock: the rt lock to be initialized - * - * Initialize the rt lock to unlocked state. - * - * Initializing of a locked rt lock is not allowed +/* + * rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked when fast path fails + * @lock: The rtmutex to block lock + * @ww_ctx: WW mutex context pointer + * @state: The task state for sleeping */ -void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name, - struct lock_class_key *key) +static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + unsigned int state) { - lock->owner = NULL; - raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock); - lock->waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + unsigned long flags; + int ret; - if (name && key) - debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name, key); + /* + * Do all pre-schedule work here, before we queue a waiter and invoke + * PI -- any such work that trips on rtlock (PREEMPT_RT spinlock) would + * otherwise recurse back into task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() through + * rtlock_slowlock() and will then enqueue a second waiter for this + * same task and things get really confusing real fast. + */ + rt_mutex_pre_schedule(); + + /* + * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can + * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled + * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the + * rtmutex with lock->wait_lock held. But we cannot unconditionally + * enable interrupts in that early boot case. So we need to use the + * irqsave/restore variants. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state, &wake_q); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_wake(&lock->wait_lock, flags, &wake_q); + rt_mutex_post_schedule(); + + return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init); -/** - * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a - * proxy owner - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner - * - * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support. This initializes the rtmutex and - * assigns it to @proxy_owner. Concurrent operations on the rtmutex are not - * possible at this point because the pi_state which contains the rtmutex - * is not yet visible to other tasks. - */ -void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct task_struct *proxy_owner) +static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + unsigned int state) { - __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL, NULL); - debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner); - rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner); + lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on); + + if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock))) + return 0; + + return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, NULL, state); } +#endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX */ -/** - * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner - * - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked - * - * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support. This merrily cleans up the rtmutex - * (debugging) state. Concurrent operations on this rt_mutex are not - * possible because it belongs to the pi_state which is about to be freed - * and it is not longer visible to other tasks. +#ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS +/* + * Functions required for spin/rw_lock substitution on RT kernels */ -void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct task_struct *proxy_owner) -{ - debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock); - rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL); -} /** - * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task - * @lock: the rt_mutex to take - * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter - * @task: the task to prepare - * - * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock - * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that. - * - * NOTE: does _NOT_ remove the @waiter on failure; must either call - * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() or rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() after this. - * - * Returns: - * 0 - task blocked on lock - * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up - * <0 - error - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support. + * rtlock_slowlock_locked - Slow path lock acquisition for RT locks + * @lock: The underlying RT mutex + * @wake_q: The wake_q to wake tasks after we release the wait_lock */ -int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct task_struct *task) +static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) + __releases(&lock->wait_lock) __acquires(&lock->wait_lock) { - int ret; + struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; + struct task_struct *owner; lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); - if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL)) - return 1; + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) + return; - /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */ - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, - RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK); + rt_mutex_init_rtlock_waiter(&waiter); - if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { - /* - * Reset the return value. We might have - * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner - * released the lock while we were walking the - * pi chain. Let the waiter sort it out. - */ - ret = 0; - } + /* Save current state and set state to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT */ + current_save_and_set_rtlock_wait_state(); - debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); + trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); - return ret; -} + task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, wake_q); -/** - * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task - * @lock: the rt_mutex to take - * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter - * @task: the task to prepare - * - * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock - * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that. - * - * NOTE: unlike __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock this _DOES_ remove the @waiter - * on failure. - * - * Returns: - * 0 - task blocked on lock - * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up - * <0 - error - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support. - */ -int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct task_struct *task) -{ - int ret; - - raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task); - if (unlikely(ret)) - remove_waiter(lock, waiter); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + for (;;) { + /* Try to acquire the lock again */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, &waiter)) + break; - return ret; -} + if (&waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) + owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + else + owner = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&lock->wait_lock, wake_q); -/** - * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock - * - * @lock: the rt lock query - * - * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL - * - * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock - * itself. - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support - */ -struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) -{ - if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) - return NULL; + if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, &waiter, owner)) + schedule_rtlock(); - return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task; -} + raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + set_current_state(TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT); + } -/** - * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition - * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on - * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have - * been started. - * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter - * - * Wait for the the lock acquisition started on our behalf by - * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call - * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(). - * - * Returns: - * 0 - success - * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support - */ -int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) -{ - int ret; + /* Restore the task state */ + current_restore_rtlock_saved_state(); - raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - /* sleep on the mutex */ - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter); /* - * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might - * have to fix that up. + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. + * We might have to fix that up: */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); + debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); - return ret; + trace_contention_end(lock, 0); } -/** - * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition - * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on - * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter - * - * Attempt to clean up after a failed __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() or - * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(). - * - * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can - * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can - * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the - * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure. - * - * Returns: - * true - did the cleanup, we done. - * false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned, - * caller should disregards its return value. - * - * Special API call for PI-futex support - */ -bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +static __always_inline void __sched rtlock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { - bool cleanup = false; - - raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); - /* - * Do an unconditional try-lock, this deals with the lock stealing - * state where __rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> mark_wakeup_next_waiter() - * sets a NULL owner. - * - * We're not interested in the return value, because the subsequent - * test on rt_mutex_owner() will infer that. If the trylock succeeded, - * we will own the lock and it will have removed the waiter. If we - * failed the trylock, we're still not owner and we need to remove - * ourselves. - */ - try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter); - /* - * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list. - * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list. - */ - if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) { - remove_waiter(lock, waiter); - cleanup = true; - } - /* - * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might - * have to fix that up. - */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); - - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); + unsigned long flags; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); - return cleanup; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock, &wake_q); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_wake(&lock->wait_lock, flags, &wake_q); } + +#endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS */ |