diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier')
10 files changed, 137 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c index bed53b561e04..1b138cd2b187 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c @@ -250,12 +250,13 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xffff), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .fixup_map_array_ro = { 3 }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = -29, + .retval = 65507, }, { "invalid write map access into a read-only array 1", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c index 1bdc8e6684f7..fe4bb70eb9c5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c @@ -75,3 +75,26 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, }, +{ + "BPF_ATOMIC_AND with fetch - r0 as source reg", + .insns = { + /* val = 0x110; */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0x110), + /* old = atomic_fetch_and(&val, 0x011); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x011), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* if (old != 0x110) exit(3); */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0x110, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 3), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* if (val != 0x010) exit(2); */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0x010, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c index 2efd8bcf57a1..6e52dfc64415 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c @@ -94,3 +94,28 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid read from stack", }, +{ + "BPF_W cmpxchg should zero top 32 bits", + .insns = { + /* r0 = U64_MAX; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, 1), + /* u64 val = r0; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* r0 = (u32)atomic_cmpxchg((u32 *)&val, r0, 1); */ + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), + /* r1 = 0x00000000FFFFFFFFull; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 1), + /* if (r0 != r1) exit(1); */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c index 70f982e1f9f0..9d0716ac5080 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c @@ -75,3 +75,28 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, }, +{ + "BPF_W atomic_fetch_or should zero top 32 bits", + .insns = { + /* r1 = U64_MAX; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 1), + /* u64 val = r1; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), + /* r1 = (u32)atomic_fetch_or((u32 *)&val, 2); */ + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), + /* r2 = 0x00000000FFFFFFFF; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, 1), + /* if (r2 != r1) exit(1); */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 57ed67b86074..8a1caf46ffbc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", .result = REJECT, }, @@ -298,9 +296,6 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, - /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", .result = REJECT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c index 1fd07a4f27ac..91869aea6d64 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 2", @@ -20,6 +21,8 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, }, @@ -31,20 +34,24 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 4", .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R6 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -55,8 +62,9 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 6", @@ -67,8 +75,9 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 7", @@ -80,8 +89,9 @@ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { @@ -94,8 +104,9 @@ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", + .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { @@ -106,8 +117,9 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", + .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 10", @@ -119,6 +131,6 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, .errstr = "math between ctx pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed", + .result = REJECT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c index 9baca7a75c42..c2aa6f26738b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -43,7 +42,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -69,7 +67,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -94,7 +91,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -141,7 +137,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -210,7 +205,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -260,7 +254,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -287,7 +280,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -313,7 +305,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -342,7 +333,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -372,7 +362,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 4 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -400,7 +389,5 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c index b117bdd3806d..1f82021429bf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -91,5 +93,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result = ACCEPT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c index b018ad71e0a8..bd436df5cc32 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "unpriv: adding of fp", + "unpriv: adding of fp, reg", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), @@ -510,6 +510,19 @@ .result = ACCEPT, }, { + "unpriv: adding of fp, imm", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ "unpriv: cmp of stack pointer", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c index ed4e76b24649..e5913fd3b903 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 5 }, .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 }, .result = ACCEPT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps", .retval = 1, }, { @@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different pointers or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -169,7 +167,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps or paths", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -517,6 +515,27 @@ .retval = 0xabcdef12, }, { + "map access: value_ptr += N, value_ptr -= N known scalar", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0x12345678), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0x12345678, +}, +{ "map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 1", .insns = { BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), |