summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-05-14bpf, doc: howto use/run the BPF selftestsJesper Dangaard Brouer
I always forget howto run the BPF selftests. Thus, lets add that info to the QA document. Documentation was based on Cilium's documentation: http://cilium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bpf/#verifying-the-setup Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-14bpf, doc: convert bpf_devel_QA.rst to use RST formattingJesper Dangaard Brouer
Same story as bpf_design_QA.rst RST format conversion. Again thanks to Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> for fixes and patches that have been squashed. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-14bpf, doc: convert bpf_design_QA.rst to use RST formattingJesper Dangaard Brouer
The RST formatting is done such that that when rendered or converted to different formats, an automatic index with links are created to the subsections. Thus, the questions are created as sections (or subsections), in-order to get the wanted auto-generated FAQ/QA index. Special thanks to Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> who have reviewed and corrected both RST formatting and GitHub rendering issues in this file. Those commits have been squashed. I've manually tested that this also renders nicely if included as part of the kernel 'make htmldocs'. As the end-goal is for this to become more integrated with kernel-doc project/movement. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-14bpf, doc: rename txt files to rst filesJesper Dangaard Brouer
This will cause them to get auto rendered, e.g. when viewing them on GitHub. Followup patches will correct the content to be RST compliant. Also adjust README.rst to point to the renamed files. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-14bpf, doc: add basic README.rst fileJesper Dangaard Brouer
A README.rst file in a directory have special meaning for sites like github, which auto renders the contents. Plus search engines like Google also index these README.rst files. Auto rendering allow us to use links, for (re)directing eBPF users to other places where docs live. The end-goal would be to direct users towards https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest but we haven't written the full docs yet, so we start out small and take this incrementally. This directory itself contains some useful docs, which can be linked to from the README.rst file (verified this works for github). Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-04-23bpf: Document sockmap '-target bpf' requirement for PROG_TYPE_SK_MSGJohn Fastabend
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG programs use a 'void *' for both data and the data_end pointers. Additionally, the verifier ensures that every accesses into the values is a __u64 read. This correctly maps on to the BPF 64-bit architecture. However, to ensure that when building on 32bit architectures that clang uses correct types the '-target bpf' option _must_ be specified. To make this clear add a note to the Documentation. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-03-20bpf, doc: add description wrt native/bpf clang target and pointer sizeDaniel Borkmann
As this recently came up on netdev [0], lets add it to the BPF devel doc. [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg489612.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-02bpf: add documentation to compare clang "-target bpf" and default targetYonghong Song
The added documentation explains how generated codes may differ between clang bpf target and default target, and when to use each target. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-06bpf, doc: add faq about bpf development processDaniel Borkmann
In the same spirit of netdev FAQ, start a BPF FAQ as a collection of expectations and/or workflow details in the context of BPF patch processing. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2017-11-01bpf: document answers to common questions about BPFAlexei Starovoitov
to address common misconceptions about what BPF is and what it's not add short BPF Q&A that clarifies core BPF design principles and answers some common questions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>