| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As we now have generic infrastructure to support backtracing of other
CPUs in the system on lockups, we can start to implement this for ARM.
Initially, we add an IPI based implementation, as the GIC code needs
modification to support the generation of FIQ IPIs, and not all ARM
platforms have the ability to raise a FIQ in the non-secure world.
This provides us with a "best efforts" implementation in the absence
of FIQs.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
This patch prepares the removal of <asm/mach/irq.h> include in the
GIC and VIC irqchip drivers.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
|
|
Make mach/irqs.h optional for SPARSE_IRQ. With this change mach/irqs.h can
be removed by converting platforms over to sparse irq.
Platforms either need to set nr_irqs in their machine desc or all irqchips
used by a platform need to allocate their irq_descs. There cannot be a
mixture. Once this is done, the platforms can select SPARSE_IRQ. shmobile
does the latter, and mmp and pxa do the former.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
|
|
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
...
> The __exception annotation on a function causes this to happen:
>
> [<c002406c>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x6c/0x8c) from [<c0024b84>]
> (__irq_svc+0x44/0xcc)
> Exception stack(0xc3897c78 to 0xc3897cc0)
> 7c60: 4022d320 4022e000
> 7c80: 08000075 00001000 c32273c0 c03ce1c0 c2b49b78 4022d000 c2b420b4 00000001
> 7ca0: 00000000 c3897cfc 00000000 c3897cc0 c00afc54 c002edd8 00000013 ffffffff
>
> Where that stack dump represents the pt_regs for the exception which
> happened. Any function found in while unwinding will cause this to
> be printed.
>
> If you insert a C function between the IRQ assembly and asm_do_IRQ,
> the
> dump you get from asm_do_IRQ will be the stack for your function,
> not
> the pt_regs. That makes the feature useless.
>
When __irq_svc - or any of the other exception handling assembly code -
calls the C code, the stack pointer will be pointing at the pt_regs
structure.
All the entry points into C code from the exception handling code are
marked with __exception or __exception_irq_enter to indicate that they
are one of the functions which has pt_regs above them.
Normally, when you've entered asm_do_IRQ() you will have this stack
layout (higher address towards top):
pt_regs
asm_do_IRQ frame
If you insert a C function between the exception assembly code and
asm_do_IRQ, you end up with this stack layout instead:
pt_regs
your function frame
asm_do_IRQ frame
This means when we unwind, we'll get to asm_do_IRQ, and rather than
dumping out the pt_regs, we'll dump out your functions stack frame
instead, because that's what is above the asm_do_IRQ stack frame
rather than the expected pt_regs structure.
The fix is to introduce handle_IRQ() for no exception stack dump, so
it can be called with MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER is selected and a C function
is between the assembly code and the actual IRQ handling code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
|
|
So to allow NR_IRQS to be dynamic and platforms to specify the number
of IRQs really needed.
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
irq.h is using struct pt_regs *. Due to this compilation
warning is comming. Removing this warning by adding declaration
of struct pt_regs.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
RiscPC is the only platform using the default setting for NR_IRQS,
so the default NR_IRQS doesn't really make sense; remove it and
make RiscPC provide such a definition.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Move platform independent header files to arch/arm/include/asm, leaving
those in asm/arch* and asm/plat* alone.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
