| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
If the kernel is built big endian, then using the __raw read and write IO
accessors is not going to work as they end up writing big-endian data to
little-endian IO registers. Fix this by using the readl and writel relaxed
versions which ensure little endian IO.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
|
|
Many files under "arm/mach-exynos" are having file path in file
comment section which is invalid now.
So for better code maintainability let's remove them.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
|
|
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous"
section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
(aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
|
|
BSYM macro is only needed for assembly files and its usage in c files is
wrong, so remove it. The linker will correctly set bit 0 for Thumb2
kernels.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
|
|
The arch/arm/mach-exynos4 directory (CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4) has
made for plaforms based on EXYNOS4 SoCs. But since upcoming
Samsung's SoCs such as EXYNOS5 (ARM Cortex A15) can reuse most
codes in current mach-exynos4, one mach-exynos directory will
be used for them.
This patch changes to CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS (arch/arm/mach-exynos)
but keeps original CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4 in mach-exynos/Kconfig to
avoid changing in driver side.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
|
