summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-11-06arm64: implement ftrace with regsTorsten Duwe
This patch implements FTRACE_WITH_REGS for arm64, which allows a traced function's arguments (and some other registers) to be captured into a struct pt_regs, allowing these to be inspected and/or modified. This is a building block for live-patching, where a function's arguments may be forwarded to another function. This is also necessary to enable ftrace and in-kernel pointer authentication at the same time, as it allows the LR value to be captured and adjusted prior to signing. Using GCC's -fpatchable-function-entry=N option, we can have the compiler insert a configurable number of NOPs between the function entry point and the usual prologue. This also ensures functions are AAPCS compliant (e.g. disabling inter-procedural register allocation). For example, with -fpatchable-function-entry=2, GCC 8.1.0 compiles the following: | unsigned long bar(void); | | unsigned long foo(void) | { | return bar() + 1; | } ... to: | <foo>: | nop | nop | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! | mov x29, sp | bl 0 <bar> | add x0, x0, #0x1 | ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16 | ret This patch builds the kernel with -fpatchable-function-entry=2, prefixing each function with two NOPs. To trace a function, we replace these NOPs with a sequence that saves the LR into a GPR, then calls an ftrace entry assembly function which saves this and other relevant registers: | mov x9, x30 | bl <ftrace-entry> Since patchable functions are AAPCS compliant (and the kernel does not use x18 as a platform register), x9-x18 can be safely clobbered in the patched sequence and the ftrace entry code. There are now two ftrace entry functions, ftrace_regs_entry (which saves all GPRs), and ftrace_entry (which saves the bare minimum). A PLT is allocated for each within modules. Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de> [Mark: rework asm, comments, PLTs, initialization, commit message] Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de> Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Tested-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-08-05arm64: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefixChuhong Yuan
In commit b6b2735514bc ("tracing: Use str_has_prefix() instead of using fixed sizes") the newly introduced str_has_prefix() was used to replace error-prone strncmp(str, const, len). Here fix codes with the same pattern. Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500Thomas Gleixner
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-11-27arm64/module: switch to ADRP/ADD sequences for PLT entriesArd Biesheuvel
Now that we have switched to the small code model entirely, and reduced the extended KASLR range to 4 GB, we can be sure that the targets of relative branches that are out of range are in range for a ADRP/ADD pair, which is one instruction shorter than our current MOVN/MOVK/MOVK sequence, and is more idiomatic and so it is more likely to be implemented efficiently by micro-architectures. So switch over the ordinary PLT code and the special handling of the Cortex-A53 ADRP errata, as well as the ftrace trampline handling. Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [will: Added a couple of comments in the plt equality check] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-11-20arm64/module: use plt section indices for relocationsJessica Yu
Instead of saving a pointer to the .plt and .init.plt sections to apply plt-based relocations, save and use their section indices instead. The mod->arch.{core,init}.plt pointers were problematic for livepatch because they pointed within temporary section headers (provided by the module loader via info->sechdrs) that would be freed after module load. Since livepatch modules may need to apply relocations post-module-load (for example, to patch a module that is loaded later), using section indices to offset into the section headers (instead of accessing them through a saved pointer) allows livepatch modules on arm64 to pass in their own copy of the section headers to apply_relocate_add() to apply delayed relocations. Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-04-24arm64/kernel: rename module_emit_adrp_veneer->module_emit_veneer_for_adrpKim Phillips
Commit a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419") introduced a function whose name ends with "_veneer". This clashes with commit bd8b22d2888e ("Kbuild: kallsyms: ignore veneers emitted by the ARM linker"), which removes symbols ending in "_veneer" from kallsyms. The problem was manifested as 'perf test -vvvvv vmlinux' failed, correctly claiming the symbol 'module_emit_adrp_veneer' was present in vmlinux, but not in kallsyms. ... ERR : 0xffff00000809aa58: module_emit_adrp_veneer not on kallsyms ... test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: FAILED! Fix the problem by renaming module_emit_adrp_veneer to module_emit_veneer_for_adrp. Now the test passes. Fixes: a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419") Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-03-09arm64/kernel: enable A53 erratum #8434319 handling at runtimeArd Biesheuvel
Omit patching of ADRP instruction at module load time if the current CPUs are not susceptible to the erratum. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [will: Drop duplicate initialisation of .def_scope field] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-03-09arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419Ard Biesheuvel
Working around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419 involves special handling of ADRP instructions that end up in the last two instruction slots of a 4k page, or whose output register gets overwritten without having been read. (Note that the latter instruction sequence is never emitted by a properly functioning compiler, which is why it is disregarded by the handling of the same erratum in the bfd.ld linker which we rely on for the core kernel) Normally, this gets taken care of by the linker, which can spot such sequences at final link time, and insert a veneer if the ADRP ends up at a vulnerable offset. However, linux kernel modules are partially linked ELF objects, and so there is no 'final link time' other than the runtime loading of the module, at which time all the static relocations are resolved. For this reason, we have implemented the #843419 workaround for modules by avoiding ADRP instructions altogether, by using the large C model, and by passing -mpc-relative-literal-loads to recent versions of GCC that may emit adrp/ldr pairs to perform literal loads. However, this workaround forces us to keep literal data mixed with the instructions in the executable .text segment, and literal data may inadvertently turn into an exploitable speculative gadget depending on the relative offsets of arbitrary symbols. So let's reimplement this workaround in a way that allows us to switch back to the small C model, and to drop the -mpc-relative-literal-loads GCC switch, by patching affected ADRP instructions at runtime: - ADRP instructions that do not appear at 4k relative offset 0xff8 or 0xffc are ignored - ADRP instructions that are within 1 MB of their target symbol are converted into ADR instructions - remaining ADRP instructions are redirected via a veneer that performs the load using an unaffected movn/movk sequence. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [will: tidied up ADRP -> ADR instruction patching.] [will: use ULL suffix for 64-bit immediate] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-03-08arm64: module: don't BUG when exceeding preallocated PLT countArd Biesheuvel
When PLTs are emitted at relocation time, we really should not exceed the number that we counted when parsing the relocation tables, and so currently, we BUG() on this condition. However, even though this is a clear bug in this particular piece of code, we can easily recover by failing to load the module. So instead, return 0 from module_emit_plt_entry() if this condition occurs, which is not a valid kernel address, and can hence serve as a flag value that makes the relocation routine bail out. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-12-01arm64: ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through codeArd Biesheuvel
When building the arm64 kernel with both CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE enabled, the ftrace-mod.o object file is built with the kernel and contains a trampoline that is linked into each module, so that modules can be loaded far away from the kernel and still reach the ftrace entry point in the core kernel with an ordinary relative branch, as is emitted by the compiler instrumentation code dynamic ftrace relies on. In order to be able to build out of tree modules, this object file needs to be included into the linux-headers or linux-devel packages, which is undesirable, as it makes arm64 a special case (although a precedent does exist for 32-bit PPC). Given that the trampoline essentially consists of a PLT entry, let's not bother with a source or object file for it, and simply patch it in whenever the trampoline is being populated, using the existing PLT support routines. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-12-01arm64: module-plts: factor out PLT generation code for ftraceArd Biesheuvel
To allow the ftrace trampoline code to reuse the PLT entry routines, factor it out and move it into asm/module.h. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-04-26arm64: module: split core and init PLT sectionsArd Biesheuvel
The arm64 module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for init code. However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently, and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module region. This leads to relocation failures if the distance between those regions exceeds 128 MB. (In fact, this corner case is highly unlikely to occur on arm64, but the issue has been observed on ARM, whose module region is much smaller). So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt" so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are defined in the same section as the relocated branch instruction. Since there may now be two PLT entries associated with each entry in the symbol table, we can no longer hijack the symbol::st_size fields to record the addresses of PLT entries as we emit them for zero-addend relocations. So instead, perform an explicit comparison to check for duplicate entries. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2016-02-24arm64: add support for module PLTsArd Biesheuvel
This adds support for emitting PLTs at module load time for relative branches that are out of range. This is a prerequisite for KASLR, which may place the kernel and the modules anywhere in the vmalloc area, making it more likely that branch target offsets exceed the maximum range of +/- 128 MB. In this version, I removed the distinction between relocations against .init executable sections and ordinary executable sections. The reason is that it is hardly worth the trouble, given that .init.text usually does not contain that many far branches, and this version now only reserves PLT entry space for jump and call relocations against undefined symbols (since symbols defined in the same module can be assumed to be within +/- 128 MB) For example, the mac80211.ko module (which is fairly sizable at ~400 KB) built with -mcmodel=large gives the following relocation counts: relocs branches unique !local .text 3925 3347 518 219 .init.text 11 8 7 1 .exit.text 4 4 4 1 .text.unlikely 81 67 36 17 ('unique' means branches to unique type/symbol/addend combos, of which !local is the subset referring to undefined symbols) IOW, we are only emitting a single PLT entry for the .init sections, and we are better off just adding it to the core PLT section instead. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>