summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-09-03arm64: bpf: optimize modulo operationJerin Jacob
Optimize modulo operation instruction generation by using single MSUB instruction vs MUL followed by SUB instruction scheme. Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 234Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org licenses extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-26bpf, arm64: use more scalable stadd over ldxr / stxr loop in xaddDaniel Borkmann
Since ARMv8.1 supplement introduced LSE atomic instructions back in 2016, lets add support for STADD and use that in favor of LDXR / STXR loop for the XADD mapping if available. STADD is encoded as an alias for LDADD with XZR as the destination register, therefore add LDADD to the instruction encoder along with STADD as special case and use it in the JIT for CPUs that advertise LSE atomics in CPUID register. If immediate offset in the BPF XADD insn is 0, then use dst register directly instead of temporary one. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-26bpf, arm64: remove prefetch insn in xadd mappingDaniel Borkmann
Prefetch-with-intent-to-write is currently part of the XADD mapping in the AArch64 JIT and follows the kernel's implementation of atomic_add. This may interfere with other threads executing the LDXR/STXR loop, leading to potential starvation and fairness issues. Drop the optional prefetch instruction. Fixes: 85f68fe89832 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD") Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2017-08-09bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE}Daniel Borkmann
This work implements jiting of BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions with BPF_X/BPF_K variants for the arm64 eBPF JIT. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-02bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADDDaniel Borkmann
This work adds BPF_XADD for BPF_W/BPF_DW to the arm64 JIT and therefore completes JITing of all BPF instructions, meaning we can thus also remove the 'notyet' label and do not need to fall back to the interpreter when BPF_XADD is used in a program! This now also brings arm64 JIT in line with x86_64, s390x, ppc64, sparc64, where all current eBPF features are supported. BPF_W example from test_bpf: .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x10), BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_W, R10, R0, -40), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, [...] 00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18 00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16 0000002c: b82b6b2a str w10, [x25,x11] // start of xadd mapping: 00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25 00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10] 0000003c: 885f7d4b ldxr w11, [x10] 00000040: 0b07016b add w11, w11, w7 00000044: 880b7d4b stxr w11, w11, [x10] 00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c // end of xadd mapping: [...] BPF_DW example from test_bpf: .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, -40, 0x10), BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, R10, R0, -40), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, [...] 00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18 00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16 0000002c: f82b6b2a str x10, [x25,x11] // start of xadd mapping: 00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25 00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10] 0000003c: c85f7d4b ldxr x11, [x10] 00000040: 8b07016b add x11, x11, x7 00000044: c80b7d4b stxr w11, x11, [x10] 00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c // end of xadd mapping: [...] Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8, test suite results after the patch: No JIT: [ 3751.855362] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/303 JIT'ed] With JIT: [ 3573.759527] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [303/303 JIT'ed] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-06-10arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helperZi Shen Lim
Add support for JMP_CALL_X (tail call) introduced by commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs"). bpf_tail_call() arguments: ctx - context pointer passed to next program array - pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY index - index inside array that selects specific program to run In this implementation arm64 JIT jumps into callee program after prologue, so callee program reuses the same stack. For tail_call_cnt, we use the callee-saved R26 (which was already saved/restored but previously unused by JIT). With this patch a tail call generates the following code on arm64: if (index >= array->map.max_entries) goto out; 34: mov x10, #0x10 // #16 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: cmp w2, w10 40: b.ge 0x0000000000000074 if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) goto out; tail_call_cnt++; 44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 48: cmp x26, x10 4c: b.gt 0x0000000000000074 50: add x26, x26, #0x1 prog = array->ptrs[index]; if (prog == NULL) goto out; 54: mov x10, #0x68 // #104 58: ldr x10, [x1,x10] 5c: ldr x11, [x10,x2] 60: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000074 goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); 64: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 68: ldr x10, [x11,x10] 6c: add x10, x10, #0x20 70: br x10 74: Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-11-06arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero caseZi Shen Lim
In the case of division by zero in a BPF program: A = A / X; (X == 0) the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0. This is confirmed by the test case introduced in commit 86bf1721b226 ("test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0."). Reported-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Tested-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+ Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-06-26arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugsXi Wang
Upper bits should be zeroed in endianness conversion: - even when there's no need to change endianness (i.e., BPF_FROM_BE on big endian or BPF_FROM_LE on little endian); - after rev16. This patch fixes such bugs by emitting extra instructions to clear upper bits. Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+ Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-10-20arm64: bpf: add 'shift by register' instructionsZi Shen Lim
Commit 72b603ee8cfc ("bpf: x86: add missing 'shift by register' instructions to x64 eBPF JIT") noted support for 'shift by register' in eBPF and added support for it for x64. Let's enable this for arm64 as well. The arm64 eBPF JIT compiler now passes the new 'shift by register' test case introduced in the same commit 72b603ee8cfc. Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-08arm64: eBPF JIT compilerZi Shen Lim
The JIT compiler emits A64 instructions. It supports eBPF only. Legacy BPF is supported thanks to conversion by BPF core. JIT is enabled in the same way as for other architectures: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Or for additional compiler output: echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable See Documentation/networking/filter.txt for more information. The implementation passes all 57 tests in lib/test_bpf.c on ARMv8 Foundation Model :) Also tested by Will on Juno platform. Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-06-19 21:32:11 +0000