summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-12powerpc/kprobes: Do not disable interrupts for optprobes and kprobes_on_ftraceNaveen N. Rao
Per Documentation/kprobes.txt, we don't necessarily need to disable interrupts before invoking the kprobe handlers. Masami submitted similar changes for x86 via commit a19b2e3d783964 ("kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from ftrace-based/optimized kprobes"). Do the same for powerpc. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-10-05powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftraceNaveen N. Rao
KPROBES_SANITY_TEST throws the below splat when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled: Kprobe smoke test: started DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count()) ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 1 at kernel/sched/core.c:3094 preempt_count_sub+0xcc/0x140 Modules linked in: CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc7-nnr+ #97 task: c0000000fea80000 task.stack: c0000000feb00000 NIP: c00000000011d3dc LR: c00000000011d3d8 CTR: c000000000a090d0 REGS: c0000000feb03400 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (4.13.0-rc7-nnr+) MSR: 8000000000021033 <SF,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000282 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c00000000015aa18 SOFTE: 0 <snip> NIP preempt_count_sub+0xcc/0x140 LR preempt_count_sub+0xc8/0x140 Call Trace: preempt_count_sub+0xc8/0x140 (unreliable) kprobe_handler+0x228/0x4b0 program_check_exception+0x58/0x3b0 program_check_common+0x16c/0x170 --- interrupt: 0 at kprobe_target+0x8/0x20 LR = init_test_probes+0x248/0x7d0 kp+0x0/0x80 (unreliable) livepatch_handler+0x38/0x74 init_kprobes+0x1d8/0x208 do_one_initcall+0x68/0x1d0 kernel_init_freeable+0x298/0x374 kernel_init+0x24/0x160 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 419effdc 3d22001b 39299240 81290000 2f890000 409effc8 3c82ffcb 3c62ffcb 3884bc68 3863bc18 4803d5fd 60000000 <0fe00000> 4bffffa8 60000000 60000000 ---[ end trace 432dd46b4ce3d29f ]--- Kprobe smoke test: passed successfully The issue is that we aren't disabling preemption in kprobe_ftrace_handler(). Disable it. Fixes: ead514d5fb30a0 ("powerpc/kprobes: Add support for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE") Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Trim oops a little for formatting] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-10-04powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt kernelsNaveen N. Rao
Kamalesh pointed out that we are getting the below call traces with livepatched functions when we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT: [ 495.470721] BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: cat/8394 [ 495.471167] caller is is_current_kprobe_addr+0x30/0x90 [ 495.471171] CPU: 4 PID: 8394 Comm: cat Tainted: G K 4.13.0-rc7-nnr+ #95 [ 495.471173] Call Trace: [ 495.471178] [c00000008fd9b960] [c0000000009f039c] dump_stack+0xec/0x160 (unreliable) [ 495.471184] [c00000008fd9b9a0] [c00000000059169c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170 [ 495.471187] [c00000008fd9ba30] [c000000000046460] is_current_kprobe_addr+0x30/0x90 [ 495.471191] [c00000008fd9ba60] [c00000000004e9a0] ftrace_call+0x1c/0xb8 [ 495.471195] [c00000008fd9bc30] [c000000000376fd8] seq_read+0x238/0x5c0 [ 495.471199] [c00000008fd9bcd0] [c0000000003cfd78] proc_reg_read+0x88/0xd0 [ 495.471203] [c00000008fd9bd00] [c00000000033e5d4] __vfs_read+0x44/0x1b0 [ 495.471206] [c00000008fd9bd90] [c0000000003402ec] vfs_read+0xbc/0x1b0 [ 495.471210] [c00000008fd9bde0] [c000000000342138] SyS_read+0x68/0x110 [ 495.471214] [c00000008fd9be30] [c00000000000bc6c] system_call+0x58/0x6c Commit c05b8c4474c030 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for jprobes") introduced a helper is_current_kprobe_addr() to help determine if the current function has been livepatched or if it has a jprobe installed, both of which modify the NIP. This was subsequently renamed to __is_active_jprobe(). In the case of a jprobe, kprobe_ftrace_handler() disables pre-emption before calling into setjmp_pre_handler() which returns without disabling pre-emption. This is done to ensure that the jprobe handler won't disappear beneath us if the jprobe is unregistered between the setjmp_pre_handler() and the subsequent longjmp_break_handler() called from the jprobe handler. Due to this, we can use __this_cpu_read() in __is_active_jprobe() with the pre-emption check as we know that pre-emption will be disabled. However, if this function has been livepatched, we are still doing this check and when we do so, pre-emption won't necessarily be disabled. This results in the call trace shown above. Fix this by only invoking __is_active_jprobe() when pre-emption is disabled. And since we now guard this within a pre-emption check, we can instead use raw_cpu_read() to get the current_kprobe value skipping the check done by __this_cpu_read(). Fixes: c05b8c4474c030 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for jprobes") Reported-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-10-04powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handlerNaveen N. Rao
In commit c05b8c4474c03 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for jprobes"), we added a helper is_current_kprobe_addr() to help detect if the modified regs->nip was due to a jprobe or livepatch. Masami felt that the function name was not quite clear. To that end, this patch renames is_current_kprobe_addr() to __is_active_jprobe() and adds a comment to (hopefully) better clarify the purpose of this helper. The helper has also now been moved to kprobes-ftrace.c so that it is only available for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-24powerpc/kprobes: Add support for KPROBES_ON_FTRACENaveen N. Rao
Allow kprobes to be placed on ftrace _mcount() call sites. This optimization avoids the use of a trap, by riding on ftrace infrastructure. This depends on HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS which depends on MPROFILE_KERNEL, which is only currently enabled on powerpc64le with newer toolchains. Based on the x86 code by Masami. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>