summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-20powerpc/mm/radix: Fix PTE/PMD fragment count for early page table mappingsAneesh Kumar K.V
We can hit the following BUG_ON during memory unplug: kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c:342! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries NIP [c000000000093308] pmd_fragment_free+0x48/0xc0 LR [c00000000147bfec] remove_pagetable+0x578/0x60c Call Trace: 0xc000008050000000 (unreliable) remove_pagetable+0x384/0x60c radix__remove_section_mapping+0x18/0x2c remove_section_mapping+0x1c/0x3c arch_remove_memory+0x11c/0x180 try_remove_memory+0x120/0x1b0 __remove_memory+0x20/0x40 dlpar_remove_lmb+0xc0/0x114 dlpar_memory+0x8b0/0xb20 handle_dlpar_errorlog+0xc0/0x190 pseries_hp_work_fn+0x2c/0x60 process_one_work+0x30c/0x810 worker_thread+0x98/0x540 kthread+0x1c4/0x1d0 ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 This occurs when unplug is attempted for such memory which has been mapped using memblock pages as part of early kernel page table setup. We wouldn't have initialized the PMD or PTE fragment count for those PMD or PTE pages. This can be fixed by allocating memory in PAGE_SIZE granularity during early page table allocation. This makes sure a specific page is not shared for another memblock allocation and we can free them correctly on removing page-table pages. Since we now do PAGE_SIZE allocations for both PUD table and PMD table (Note that PTE table allocation is already of PAGE_SIZE), we end up allocating more memory for the same amount of system RAM. Here is a comparision of how much more we need for a 64T and 2G system after this patch: 1. 64T system ------------- 64T RAM would need 64G for vmemmap with struct page size being 64B. 128 PUD tables for 64T memory (1G mappings) 1 PUD table and 64 PMD tables for 64G vmemmap (2M mappings) With default PUD[PMD]_TABLE_SIZE(4K), (128+1+64)*4K=772K With PAGE_SIZE(64K) table allocations, (128+1+64)*64K=12352K 2. 2G system ------------ 2G RAM would need 2M for vmemmap with struct page size being 64B. 1 PUD table for 2G memory (1G mapping) 1 PUD table and 1 PMD table for 2M vmemmap (2M mappings) With default PUD[PMD]_TABLE_SIZE(4K), (1+1+1)*4K=12K With new PAGE_SIZE(64K) table allocations, (1+1+1)*64K=192K Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709131925.922266-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
2019-09-26mm: treewide: clarify pgtable_page_{ctor,dtor}() namingMark Rutland
The naming of pgtable_page_{ctor,dtor}() seems to have confused a few people, and until recently arm64 used these erroneously/pointlessly for other levels of page table. To make it incredibly clear that these only apply to the PTE level, and to align with the naming of pgtable_pmd_page_{ctor,dtor}(), let's rename them to pgtable_pte_page_{ctor,dtor}(). These changes were generated with the following shell script: ---- git grep -lw 'pgtable_page_.tor' | while read FILE; do sed -i '{s/pgtable_page_ctor/pgtable_pte_page_ctor/}' $FILE; sed -i '{s/pgtable_page_dtor/pgtable_pte_page_dtor/}' $FILE; done ---- ... with the documentation re-flowed to remain under 80 columns, and whitespace fixed up in macros to keep backslashes aligned. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722141133.3116-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> [m68k] Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functionsJoel Fernandes (Google)
Patch series "Add support for fast mremap". This series speeds up the mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at the PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra 'address' argument that mremap passes to pte_alloc may do something subtle architecture related in the future that may make the scheme not work. Also we find that there is no point in passing the 'address' to pte_alloc since its unused. This patch therefore removes this argument tree-wide resulting in a nice negative diff as well. Also ensuring along the way that the enabled architectures do not do anything funky with the 'address' argument that goes unnoticed by the optimization. Build and boot tested on x86-64. Build tested on arm64. The config enablement patch for arm64 will be posted in the future after more testing. The changes were obtained by applying the following Coccinelle script. (thanks Julia for answering all Coccinelle questions!). Following fix ups were done manually: * Removal of address argument from pte_fragment_alloc * Removal of pte_alloc_one_fast definitions from m68k and microblaze. // Options: --include-headers --no-includes // Note: I split the 'identifier fn' line, so if you are manually // running it, please unsplit it so it runs for you. virtual patch @pte_alloc_func_def depends on patch exists@ identifier E2; identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$"; type T2; @@ fn(... - , T2 E2 ) { ... } @pte_alloc_func_proto_noarg depends on patch exists@ type T1, T2, T3, T4; identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$"; @@ ( - T3 fn(T1, T2); + T3 fn(T1); | - T3 fn(T1, T2, T4); + T3 fn(T1, T2); ) @pte_alloc_func_proto depends on patch exists@ identifier E1, E2, E4; type T1, T2, T3, T4; identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$"; @@ ( - T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2); + T3 fn(T1 E1); | - T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2, T4 E4); + T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2); ) @pte_alloc_func_call depends on patch exists@ expression E2; identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$"; @@ fn(... -, E2 ) @pte_alloc_macro depends on patch exists@ identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$"; identifier a, b, c; expression e; position p; @@ ( - #define fn(a, b, c) e + #define fn(a, b) e | - #define fn(a, b) e + #define fn(a) e ) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108181201.88826-2-joelaf@google.com Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-04powerpc/mm: add helpers to get/set mm.context->pte_fragChristophe Leroy
In order to handle pte_fragment functions with single fragment without adding pte_frag in all mm_context_t, this patch creates two helpers which do nothing on platforms using a single fragment. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-12-04powerpc/mm: Avoid useless lock with single page fragmentsChristophe Leroy
There is no point in taking the page table lock as pte_frag or pmd_frag are always NULL when we have only one fragment. Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-12-04powerpc/mm: Move pte_fragment_alloc() to a common locationChristophe Leroy
In preparation of next patch which generalises the use of pte_fragment_alloc() for all, this patch moves the related functions in a place that is common to all subarches. The 8xx will need that for supporting 16k pages, as in that mode page tables still have a size of 4k. Since pte_fragment with only once fragment is not different from what is done in the general case, we can easily migrate all subarchs to pte fragments. Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>