| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Protection key tracking information is not copied over to the
mm_struct of the child during fork(). This can cause the child to
erroneously allocate keys that were already allocated. Any allocated
execute-only key is lost aswell.
Add code; called by dup_mmap(), to copy the pkey state from parent to
child explicitly.
This problem was originally found by Dave Hansen on x86, which turns
out to be a problem on powerpc aswell.
Fixes: cf43d3b26452 ("powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Sparse tool is showing some warnings on pkeys.c file, mainly related to
storage class identifiers. There are static variables and functions not
declared as such. The same thing happens with an extern function, which
misses the header inclusion.
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:14:6: warning: symbol 'pkey_execute_disable_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:16:6: warning: symbol 'pkeys_devtree_defined' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:19:6: warning: symbol 'pkey_amr_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:20:6: warning: symbol 'pkey_iamr_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:21:6: warning: symbol 'pkey_uamor_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:22:6: warning: symbol 'execute_only_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:60:5: warning: symbol 'pkey_initialize' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c:404:6: warning: symbol 'arch_vma_access_permitted' was not declared. Should it be static?
This patch fix al the warning, basically turning all global variables that
are not declared as extern at asm/pkeys.h into static.
It also includes asm/mmu_context.h header, which contains the definition of
arch_vma_access_permitted.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
scan_pkey_feature() uses of_property_read_u32_array() to read the
ibm,processor-storage-keys property and calls be32_to_cpu() on the
value it gets. The problem is that of_property_read_u32_array() already
returns the value converted to the CPU byte order.
The value of pkeys_total ends up more or less sane because there's a min()
call in pkey_initialize() which reduces pkeys_total to 32. So in practice
the kernel ignores the fact that the hypervisor reserved one key for
itself (the device tree advertises 31 keys in my test VM).
This is wrong, but the effect in practice is that when a process tries to
allocate the 32nd key, it gets an -EINVAL error instead of -ENOSPC which
would indicate that there aren't any keys available
Fixes: cf43d3b26452 ("powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Applications need the ability to associate an address-range with some
key and latter revert to its initial default key. Pkey-0 comes close to
providing this function but falls short, because the current
implementation disallows applications to explicitly associate pkey-0 to
the address range.
Lets make pkey-0 less special and treat it almost like any other key.
Thus it can be explicitly associated with any address range, and can be
freed. This gives the application more flexibility and power. The
ability to free pkey-0 must be used responsibily, since pkey-0 is
associated with almost all address-range by default.
Even with this change pkey-0 continues to be slightly more special
from the following point of view.
(a) it is implicitly allocated.
(b) it is the default key assigned to any address-range.
(c) its permissions cannot be modified by userspace.
NOTE: (c) is specific to powerpc only. pkey-0 is associated by default
with all pages including kernel pages, and pkeys are also active in
kernel mode. If any permission is denied on pkey-0, the kernel running
in the context of the application will be unable to operate.
Tested on powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
[mpe: Drop #define PKEY_0 0 in favour of plain old 0]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
execute-only key is allocated dynamically. This is a problem. When a
thread implicitly creates an execute-only key, and resets the UAMOR
for that key, the UAMOR value does not percolate to all the other
threads. Any other thread may ignorantly change the permissions on the
key. This can cause the key to be not execute-only for that thread.
Preallocate the execute-only key and ensure that no thread can change
the permission of the key, by resetting the corresponding bit in
UAMOR.
Fixes: 5586cf61e108 ("powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Total number of pkeys calculation is off by 1. Fix it.
Fixes: 4fb158f65ac5 ("powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Key allocation and deallocation has the side effect of programming the
UAMOR/AMR/IAMR registers. This is wrong, since its the responsibility of
the application and not that of the kernel, to modify the permission on
the key.
Do not modify the pkey registers at key allocation/deallocation.
This patch also fixes a bug where a sys_pkey_free() resets the UAMOR
bits of the key, thus making its permissions unmodifiable from user
space. Later if the same key gets reallocated from a different thread
this thread will no longer be able to change the permissions on the key.
Fixes: cf43d3b26452 ("powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Deny all permissions on all keys, with some exceptions. pkey-0 must
allow all permissions, or else everything comes to a screaching halt.
Execute-only key must allow execute permission.
Fixes: cf43d3b26452 ("powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Currently in a multithreaded application, a key allocated by one
thread is not usable by other threads. By "not usable" we mean that
other threads are unable to change the access permissions for that
key for themselves.
When a new key is allocated in one thread, the corresponding UAMOR
bits for that thread get enabled, however the UAMOR bits for that key
for all other threads remain disabled.
Other threads have no way to set permissions on the key, and the
current default permissions are that read/write is enabled for all
keys, which means the key has no effect for other threads. Although
that may be the desired behaviour in some circumstances, having all
threads able to control their permissions for the key is more
flexible.
The current behaviour also differs from the x86 behaviour, which is
problematic for users.
To fix this, enable the UAMOR bits for all keys, at process
creation (in start_thread(), ie exec time). Since the contents of
UAMOR are inherited at fork, all threads are capable of modifying the
permissions on any key.
This is technically an ABI break on powerpc, but pkey support is fairly
new on powerpc and not widely used, and this brings us into
line with x86.
Fixes: cf43d3b26452 ("powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Tested-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
[mpe: Reword some of the changelog]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Disassociate the exec_key from a VMA if the VMA permission is not
PROT_EXEC anymore. Otherwise the exec_only key continues to be
associated with the vma, causing unexpected behavior.
The problem was reported on x86 by Shakeel Butt, which is also
applicable on powerpc.
Fixes: 5586cf61e108 ("powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Reported-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Adds more code comments. We also remove an unnecessary pkey check
after we check for pkey error in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
thread_pkey_regs_init() initializes the pkey related registers
instead of initializing the fields in the task structures. Fortunately
those key related registers are re-set to zero when the task
gets scheduled on the cpu. However its good to fix this glaringly
visible error.
Fixes: 06bb53b33804 ("powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches")
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
PAPR defines 'ibm,processor-storage-keys' property. It exports two
values. The first value holds the number of data-access keys and the
second holds the number of instruction-access keys. Due to a bug in
the firmware, instruction-access keys is always reported as zero.
However any key can be configured to disable data-access and/or
disable execution-access. The inavailablity of the second value is not
a big handicap, though it could have been used to determine if the
platform supported disable-execution-access.
Non-PAPR platforms do not define this property in the device tree yet.
Fortunately power8 is the only released Non-PAPR platform that is
supported. Here, we hardcode the number of supported pkey to 32, by
consulting the PowerISA3.0
This patch calculates the number of keys supported by the platform.
Also it determines the platform support for read/write/execution
access support for pkeys.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
[mpe: Use a PVR check instead of CPU_FTR for execute. Restrict to
Power7/8/9 for now until older CPUs are tested.]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
This patch provides the implementation for
arch_vma_access_permitted(). Returns true if the
requested access is allowed by pkey associated with the
vma.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
helper function that checks if the read/write/execute is allowed
on the pte.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
arch independent code calls arch_override_mprotect_pkey()
to return a pkey that best matches the requested protection.
This patch provides the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
arch-independent code expects the arch to map
a pkey into the vma's protection bit setting.
The patch provides that ability.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
This patch provides the implementation of execute-only pkey.
The architecture-independent layer expects the arch-dependent
layer, to support the ability to create and enable a special
key which has execute-only permission.
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Store and restore the AMR, IAMR and UAMOR register state of the task
before scheduling out and after scheduling in, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
powerpc has hardware support to disable execute on a pkey.
This patch enables the ability to create execute-disabled
keys.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
This patch provides the detailed implementation for
a user to allocate a key and enable it in the hardware.
It provides the plumbing, but it cannot be used till
the system call is implemented. The next patch will
do so.
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Introduce helper functions that can initialize the bits in the AMR,
IAMR and UAMOR register; the bits that correspond to the given pkey.
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Implements helper functions to read and write the key related
registers; AMR, IAMR, UAMOR.
AMR register tracks the read,write permission of a key
IAMR register tracks the execute permission of a key
UAMOR register enables and disables a key
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Total 32 keys are available on power7 and above. However
pkey 0,1 are reserved. So effectively we have 30 pkeys.
On 4K kernels, we do not have 5 bits in the PTE to
represent all the keys; we only have 3bits. Two of those
keys are reserved; pkey 0 and pkey 1. So effectively we
have 6 pkeys.
This patch keeps track of reserved keys, allocated keys
and keys that are currently free.
Also it adds skeletal functions and macros, that the
architecture-independent code expects to be available.
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Basic plumbing to initialize the pkey system.
Nothing is enabled yet. A later patch will enable it
once all the infrastructure is in place.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
[mpe: Rework copyrights to use SPDX tags]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
