| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Selecting PERF_EVENTS without selecting RISCV_BASE_PMU results in a build
error.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
[Palmer: commit text]
Fixes: 178e9fc47aae("perf: riscv: preliminary RISC-V support")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
|
RISC-V was missing a proper perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs macro for
CONFIG_PERF_EVENT builds.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-10-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
|
|
Enabling both CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS without !CONFIG_SMP
generates following compilation error.
arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h:80:2: error: expected
specifier-qualifier-list before 'irqreturn_t'
irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
^~~~~~~~~~~
Include interrupt.h in proper place to avoid compilation
error.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
|
This patch provide a basic PMU, riscv_base_pmu, which supports two
general hardware event, instructions and cycles. Furthermore, this
PMU serves as a reference implementation to ease the portings in
the future.
riscv_base_pmu should be able to run on any RISC-V machine that
conforms to the Priv-Spec. Note that the latest qemu model hasn't
fully support a proper behavior of Priv-Spec 1.10 yet, but work
around should be easy with very small fixes. Please check
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/pull/115 for future updates.
Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <greentime@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
