| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Now the 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' and 'struct tdx_module_args' are
almost the same, and the TDX_HYPERCALL and TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro
share similar code pattern too. The __tdx_hypercall() and __tdcall()
should be unified to use the same assembly code.
As a preparation to unify them, simplify the TDX_HYPERCALL to make it
more like the TDX_MODULE_CALL.
The TDX_HYPERCALL takes the pointer of 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' as
function call argument, and does below extra things comparing to the
TDX_MODULE_CALL:
1) It sets RAX to 0 (TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf) internally;
2) It sets RCX to the (fixed) bitmap of shared registers internally;
3) It calls __tdx_hypercall_failed() internally (and panics) when the
TDCALL instruction itself fails;
4) After TDCALL, it moves R10 to RAX to return the return code of the
VMCALL leaf, regardless the '\ret' asm macro argument;
Firstly, change the TDX_HYPERCALL to take the same function call
arguments as the TDX_MODULE_CALL does: TDCALL leaf ID, and the pointer
to 'struct tdx_module_args'. Then 1) and 2) can be moved to the
caller:
- TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf ID can be passed via the function call argument;
- 'struct tdx_module_args' is 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' + RCX, thus
the bitmap of shared registers can be passed via RCX in the
structure.
Secondly, to move 3) and 4) out of assembly, make the TDX_HYPERCALL
always save output registers to the structure. The caller then can:
- Call __tdx_hypercall_failed() when TDX_HYPERCALL returns error;
- Return R10 in the structure as the return code of the VMCALL leaf;
With above changes, change the asm function from __tdx_hypercall() to
__tdcall_hypercall(), and reimplement __tdx_hypercall() as the C wrapper
of it. This avoids having to add another wrapper of __tdx_hypercall()
(_tdx_hypercall() is already taken).
The __tdcall_hypercall() will be replaced with a __tdcall() variant
using TDX_MODULE_CALL in a later commit as the final goal is to have one
assembly to handle both TDCALL and TDVMCALL.
Currently, the __tdx_hypercall() asm is in '.noinstr.text'. To keep
this unchanged, annotate __tdx_hypercall(), which is a C function now,
as 'noinstr'.
Remove the __tdx_hypercall_ret() as __tdx_hypercall() already does so.
Implement __tdx_hypercall() in tdx-shared.c so it can be shared with the
compressed code.
Opportunistically fix a checkpatch error complaining using space around
parenthesis '(' and ')' while moving the bitmap of shared registers to
<asm/shared/tdx.h>.
[ dhansen: quash new calls of __tdx_hypercall_ret() that showed up ]
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0cbf25e7aee3256288045023a31f65f0cef90af4.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
|
|
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro, which handles both TDCALL and
SEAMCALL, takes one parameter for each input register and an optional
'struct tdx_module_output' (a collection of output registers) as output.
This is different from the TDX_HYPERCALL macro which uses a single
'struct tdx_hypercall_args' to carry all input/output registers.
The newer TDX versions introduce more TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs which use more
input/output registers. Also, the TDH.VP.ENTER (which isn't covered
by the current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro) basically can use all registers
that the TDX_HYPERCALL does. The current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro isn't
extendible to cover those cases.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, simplify the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro
to use a single structure 'struct tdx_module_args' to carry all the
input/output registers. Currently, R10/R11 are only used as output
register but not as input by any TDCALL/SEAMCALL. Change to also use
R10/R11 as input register to make input/output registers symmetric.
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro depends on the caller to pass a
non-NULL 'struct tdx_module_output' to get additional output registers.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, change the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro to
take a new 'ret' macro argument to indicate whether to save the output
registers to the 'struct tdx_module_args'. Also introduce a new
__tdcall_ret() for that purpose, similar to the __tdx_hypercall_ret().
Note the tdcall(), which is a wrapper of __tdcall(), is called by three
callers: tdx_parse_tdinfo(), tdx_get_ve_info() and tdx_early_init().
The former two need the additional output but the last one doesn't. For
simplicity, make tdcall() always call __tdcall_ret() to avoid another
"_ret()" wrapper. The last caller tdx_early_init() isn't performance
critical anyway.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/483616c1762d85eb3a3c3035a7de061cfacf2f14.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
|
|
__tdx_module_call() is only used by the TDX guest to issue TDCALL to the
TDX module. Rename it to __tdcall() to match its behaviour, e.g., it
cannot be used to make host-side SEAMCALL.
Also rename tdx_module_call() which is a wrapper of __tdx_module_call()
to tdcall().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/785d20d99fbcd0db8262c94da6423375422d8c75.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
|
|
The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel
doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
prefix "TDX_" for all of them. Although it's arguable whether the TDX
spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
the spec when naming those macros.
Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec. As
a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
which all have prefix "TDH".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/516dccd0bd8fb9a0b6af30d25bb2d971aa03d598.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
|
|
TDX guest memory is private by default and the VMM may not access it.
However, in cases where the guest needs to share data with the VMM,
the guest and the VMM can coordinate to make memory shared between
them.
The guest side of this protocol includes the "MapGPA" hypercall. This
call takes a guest physical address range. The hypercall spec (aka.
the GHCI) says that the MapGPA call is allowed to return partial
progress in mapping this range and indicate that fact with a special
error code. A guest that sees such partial progress is expected to
retry the operation for the portion of the address range that was not
completed.
Hyper-V does this partial completion dance when set_memory_decrypted()
is called to "decrypt" swiotlb bounce buffers that can be up to 1GB
in size. It is evidently the only VMM that does this, which is why
nobody noticed this until now.
[ dhansen: rewrite changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811021246.821-2-decui%40microsoft.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 SEV updates from Borislav Petkov:
- Some SEV and CC platform helpers cleanup and simplifications now that
the usage patterns are becoming apparent
[ I'm sure I'm the only one that has gets confused by all the TLAs, but
in case there are others: here SEV is AMD's "Secure Encrypted
Virtualization" and CC is generic "Confidential Computing".
There's also Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions) and TDX (Trust
Domain Extensions), along with all the vendor memory encryption
extensions (SME, TSME, TME, and WTF).
And then we have arm64 with RMA and CCA, and I probably forgot another
dozen or so related acronyms - Linus ]
* tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/coco: Get rid of accessor functions
x86/sev: Get rid of special sev_es_enable_key
x86/coco: Mark cc_platform_has() and descendants noinstr
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 tdx updates from Dave Hansen:
- Fix a race window where load_unaligned_zeropad() could cause a fatal
shutdown during TDX private<=>shared conversion
The race has never been observed in practice but might allow
load_unaligned_zeropad() to catch a TDX page in the middle of its
conversion process which would lead to a fatal and unrecoverable
guest shutdown.
- Annotate sites where VM "exit reasons" are reused as hypercall
numbers.
* tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/mm: Fix enc_status_change_finish_noop()
x86/tdx: Fix race between set_memory_encrypted() and load_unaligned_zeropad()
x86/mm: Allow guest.enc_status_change_prepare() to fail
x86/tdx: Wrap exit reason with hcall_func()
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov:
- Add support for unaccepted memory as specified in the UEFI spec v2.9.
The gist of it all is that Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP confidential
computing guests define the notion of accepting memory before using
it and thus preventing a whole set of attacks against such guests
like memory replay and the like.
There are a couple of strategies of how memory should be accepted -
the current implementation does an on-demand way of accepting.
* tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
virt: sevguest: Add CONFIG_CRYPTO dependency
x86/efi: Safely enable unaccepted memory in UEFI
x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable
x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests
x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages
x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one()
x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub
efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory
efi: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory
efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820()
mm: Add support for unaccepted memory
|
|
tl;dr: There is a race in the TDX private<=>shared conversion code
which could kill the TDX guest. Fix it by changing conversion
ordering to eliminate the window.
TDX hardware maintains metadata to track which pages are private and
shared. Additionally, TDX guests use the guest x86 page tables to
specify whether a given mapping is intended to be private or shared.
Bad things happen when the intent and metadata do not match.
So there are two thing in play:
1. "the page" -- the physical TDX page metadata
2. "the mapping" -- the guest-controlled x86 page table intent
For instance, an unrecoverable exit to VMM occurs if a guest touches a
private mapping that points to a shared physical page.
In summary:
* Private mapping => Private Page == OK (obviously)
* Shared mapping => Shared Page == OK (obviously)
* Private mapping => Shared Page == BIG BOOM!
* Shared mapping => Private Page == OK-ish
(It will read generate a recoverable #VE via handle_mmio())
Enter load_unaligned_zeropad(). It can touch memory that is adjacent but
otherwise unrelated to the memory it needs to touch. It will cause one
of those unrecoverable exits (aka. BIG BOOM) if it blunders into a
shared mapping pointing to a private page.
This is a problem when __set_memory_enc_pgtable() converts pages from
shared to private. It first changes the mapping and second modifies
the TDX page metadata. It's moving from:
* Shared mapping => Shared Page == OK
to:
* Private mapping => Shared Page == BIG BOOM!
This means that there is a window with a shared mapping pointing to a
private page where load_unaligned_zeropad() can strike.
Add a TDX handler for guest.enc_status_change_prepare(). This converts
the page from shared to private *before* the page becomes private. This
ensures that there is never a private mapping to a shared page.
Leave a guest.enc_status_change_finish() in place but only use it for
private=>shared conversions. This will delay updating the TDX metadata
marking the page private until *after* the mapping matches the metadata.
This also ensures that there is never a private mapping to a shared page.
[ dhansen: rewrite changelog ]
Fixes: 7dbde7631629 ("x86/mm/cpa: Add support for TDX shared memory")
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230606095622.1939-3-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
Hookup TDX-specific code to accept memory.
Accepting the memory is done with ACCEPT_PAGE module call on every page
in the range. MAP_GPA hypercall is not required as the unaccepted memory
is considered private already.
Extract the part of tdx_enc_status_changed() that does memory acceptance
in a new helper. Move the helper tdx-shared.c. It is going to be used by
both main kernel and decompressor.
[ bp: Fix the INTEL_TDX_GUEST=y, KVM_GUEST=n build. ]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Rework try_accept_one() to return accepted size instead of modifying
'start' inside the helper. It makes 'start' in-only argument and
streamlines code on the caller side.
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Memory acceptance requires a hypercall and one or multiple module calls.
Make helpers for the calls available in boot stub. It has to accept
memory where kernel image and initrd are placed.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
The decision to allow parallel bringup of secondary CPUs checks
CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT to detect encrypted guests. Those cannot use
parallel bootup because accessing the local APIC is intercepted and raises
a #VC or #VE, which cannot be handled at that point.
The check works correctly, but only for AMD encrypted guests. TDX does not
set that flag.
As there is no real connection between CC attributes and the inability to
support parallel bringup, replace this with a generic control flag in
x86_cpuinit and let SEV-ES and TDX init code disable it.
Fixes: 0c7ffa32dbd6 ("x86/smpboot/64: Implement arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and enable it")
Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ilc9gd2d.ffs@tglx
|
|
TDX reuses VMEXIT "reasons" in its guest->host hypercall ABI. This is
confusing because there might not be a VMEXIT involved at *all*.
These instances are supposed to document situation and reduce confusion
by wrapping VMEXIT reasons with hcall_func().
The decompression code does not follow this convention.
Unify the TDX decompression code with the other TDX use of VMEXIT reasons.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230505120332.1429957-1-nik.borisov%40suse.com
|
|
cc_vendor is __ro_after_init and thus can be used directly.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230508121957.32341-1-bp@alien8.de
|
|
After TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI got dropped, the only flag left is
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT. The flag indicates if the caller wants to see
tdx_hypercall_args updated based on the hypercall output.
Drop the flags and provide __tdx_hypercall_ret() that matches
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT semantics.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321003511.9469-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) updates from Dave Hansen:
"Other than a minor fixup, the content here is to ensure that TDX
guests never see virtualization exceptions (#VE's) that might be
induced by the untrusted VMM.
This is a highly desirable property. Without it, #VE exception
handling would fall somewhere between NMIs, machine checks and total
insanity. With it, #VE handling remains pretty mundane.
Summary:
- Fixup comment typo
- Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
- Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE)
- Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are delivered
via a #VE"
* tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/tdx: Do not corrupt frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()
x86/tdx: Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES
x86/tdx: Relax SEPT_VE_DISABLE check for debug TD
x86/tdx: Use ReportFatalError to report missing SEPT_VE_DISABLE
x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments
x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments
x86/tdx: Add more registers to struct tdx_hypercall_args
x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
|
|
Pick up fixes before merging another batch of cpuidle updates.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
== Background ==
There is a class of side-channel attacks against SGX enclaves called
"SGX Step"[1]. These attacks create lots of exceptions inside of
enclaves. Basically, run an in-enclave instruction, cause an exception.
Over and over.
There is a concern that a VMM could attack a TDX guest in the same way
by causing lots of #VE's. The TDX architecture includes new
countermeasures for these attacks. It basically counts the number of
exceptions and can send another *special* exception once the number of
VMM-induced #VE's hits a critical threshold[2].
== Problem ==
But, these special exceptions are independent of any action that the
guest takes. They can occur anywhere that the guest executes. This
includes sensitive areas like the entry code. The (non-paranoid) #VE
handler is incapable of handling exceptions in these areas.
== Solution ==
Fortunately, the special exceptions can be disabled by the guest via
write to NOTIFY_ENABLES TDCS field. NOTIFY_ENABLES is disabled by
default, but might be enabled by a bootloader, firmware or an earlier
kernel before the current kernel runs.
Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES feature explicitly and unconditionally. Any
NOTIFY_ENABLES-based #VE's that occur before this point will end up
in the early #VE exception handler and die due to unexpected exit
reason.
[1] https://github.com/jovanbulck/sgx-step
[2] https://intel.github.io/ccc-linux-guest-hardening-docs/security-spec.html#safety-against-ve-in-kernel-code
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-8-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
A "SEPT #VE" occurs when a TDX guest touches memory that is not properly
mapped into the "secure EPT". This can be the result of hypervisor
attacks or bugs, *OR* guest bugs. Most notably, buggy guests might
touch unaccepted memory for lots of different memory safety bugs like
buffer overflows.
TDX guests do not want to continue in the face of hypervisor attacks or
hypervisor bugs. They want to terminate as fast and safely as possible.
SEPT_VE_DISABLE ensures that TDX guests *can't* continue in the face of
these kinds of issues.
But, that causes a problem. TDX guests that can't continue can't spit
out oopses or other debugging info. In essence SEPT_VE_DISABLE=1 guests
are not debuggable.
Relax the SEPT_VE_DISABLE check to warning on debug TD and panic() in
the #VE handler on EPT-violation on private memory. It will produce
useful backtrace.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-7-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
Linux TDX guests require that the SEPT_VE_DISABLE "attribute" be set.
If it is not set, the kernel is theoretically required to handle
exceptions anywhere that kernel memory is accessed, including places
like NMI handlers and in the syscall entry gap.
Rather than even try to handle these exceptions, the kernel refuses to
run if SEPT_VE_DISABLE is unset.
However, the SEPT_VE_DISABLE detection and refusal code happens very
early in boot, even before earlyprintk runs. Calling panic() will
effectively just hang the system.
Instead, call a TDX-specific panic() function. This makes a very simple
TDVMCALL which gets a short error string out to the hypervisor without
any console infrastructure.
Use TDG.VP.VMCALL<ReportFatalError> to report the error. The hypercall
can encode message up to 64 bytes in eight registers.
[ dhansen: tweak comment and remove while loop brackets. ]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-6-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
objtool found a few cases where this code called out into instrumented
code:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x2c: call to hcall_func.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x3f: call to __tdx_hypercall() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x66: call to __tdx_hypercall_failed() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fix it by:
- moving TDX tdcall assembly methods into .noinstr.text (they are already noistr-clean)
- marking __tdx_hypercall_failed() as 'noinstr'
- annotating hcall_func() as __always_inline
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.111485720@infradead.org
|
|
Now that arch_cpu_idle() is expected to return with IRQs disabled,
avoid the useless STI/CLI dance.
Per the specs this is supposed to work, but nobody has yet relied up
this behaviour so broken implementations are possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.682137572@infradead.org
|
|
Current arch_cpu_idle() is called with IRQs disabled, but will return
with IRQs enabled.
However, the very first thing the generic code does after calling
arch_cpu_idle() is raw_local_irq_disable(). This means that
architectures that can idle with IRQs disabled end up doing a
pointless 'enable-disable' dance.
Therefore, push this IRQ disabling into the idle function, meaning
that those architectures can avoid the pointless IRQ state flipping.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64]
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.618076436@infradead.org
|
|
from MMIO trace type
Both <linux/mmiotrace.h> and <asm/insn-eval.h> define various MMIO_ enum constants,
whose namespace overlaps.
Rename the <asm/insn-eval.h> ones to have a INSN_ prefix, so that the headers can be
used from the same source file.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230101162910.710293-2-Jason@zx2c4.com
|
|
To support TDX attestation, the TDX guest driver exposes an IOCTL
interface to allow userspace to get the TDREPORT0 (a.k.a. TDREPORT
subtype 0) from the TDX module via TDG.MR.TDREPORT TDCALL.
In order to get the TDREPORT0 in the TDX guest driver, instead of using
a low level function like __tdx_module_call(), add a
tdx_mcall_get_report0() wrapper function to handle it.
This is a preparatory patch for adding attestation support.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221116223820.819090-2-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy%40linux.intel.com
|
|
All normal kernel memory is "TDX private memory". This includes
everything from kernel stacks to kernel text. Handling
exceptions on arbitrary accesses to kernel memory is essentially
impossible because they can happen in horribly nasty places like
kernel entry/exit. But, TDX hardware can theoretically _deliver_
a virtualization exception (#VE) on any access to private memory.
But, it's not as bad as it sounds. TDX can be configured to never
deliver these exceptions on private memory with a "TD attribute"
called ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE. The guest has no way to *set* this
attribute, but it can check it.
Ensure ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE is set in early boot. panic() if it
is unset. There is no sane way for Linux to run with this
attribute clear so a panic() is appropriate.
There's small window during boot before the check where kernel
has an early #VE handler. But the handler is only for port I/O
and will also panic() as soon as it sees any other #VE, such as
a one generated by a private memory access.
[ dhansen: Rewrite changelog and rebase on new tdx_parse_tdinfo().
Add Kirill's tested-by because I made changes since
he wrote this. ]
Fixes: 9a22bf6debbf ("x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest")
Reported-by: ruogui.ygr@alibaba-inc.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221028141220.29217-3-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
The TDG.VP.INFO TDCALL provides the guest with various details about
the TDX system that the guest needs to run. Only one field is currently
used: 'gpa_width' which tells the guest which PTE bits mark pages shared
or private.
A second field is now needed: the guest "TD attributes" to tell if
virtualization exceptions are configured in a way that can harm the guest.
Make the naming and calling convention more generic and discrete from the
mask-centric one.
Thanks to Sathya for the inspiration here, but there's no code, comments
or changelogs left from where he started.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
unwanted loads.
In TDX guests, the second page can be shared page and a VMM may configure
it to trigger #VE.
The kernel assumes that #VE on a shared page is an MMIO access and tries to
decode instruction to handle it. In case of load_unaligned_zeropad() it
may result in confusion as it is not MMIO access.
Fix it by detecting split page MMIO accesses and failing them.
load_unaligned_zeropad() will recover using exception fixups.
The issue was discovered by analysis and reproduced artificially. It was
not triggered during testing.
[ dhansen: fix up changelogs and comments for grammar and clarity,
plus incorporate Kirill's off-by-one fix]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
After successful #VE handling, tdx_handle_virt_exception() has to move
RIP to the next instruction. The handler needs to know the length of the
instruction.
If the #VE happened due to instruction execution, the GET_VEINFO TDX
module call provides info on the instruction in R10, including its length.
For #VE due to EPT violation, the info in R10 is not populand and the
kernel must decode the instruction manually to find out its length.
Restructure the code to make it explicit that the instruction length
depends on the type of #VE. Make individual #VE handlers return
the instruction length on success or -errno on failure.
[ dhansen: fix up changelog and comments ]
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
tdx_early_handle_ve() does not increment RIP after successfully
handling the exception. That leads to infinite loop of exceptions.
Move RIP when exceptions are successfully handled.
[ dhansen: make problem statement more clear ]
Fixes: 32e72854fa5f ("x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support")
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Intel TDX protects guest memory from VMM access. Any memory that is
required for communication with the VMM must be explicitly shared.
It is a two-step process: the guest sets the shared bit in the page
table entry and notifies VMM about the change. The notification happens
using MapGPA hypercall.
Conversion back to private memory requires clearing the shared bit,
notifying VMM with MapGPA hypercall following with accepting the memory
with AcceptPage hypercall.
Provide a TDX version of x86_platform.guest.* callbacks. It makes
__set_memory_enc_pgtable() work right in TDX guest.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-27-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
KVM hypercalls use the VMCALL or VMMCALL instructions. Although the ABI
is similar, those instructions no longer function for TDX guests.
Make vendor-specific TDVMCALLs instead of VMCALL. This enables TDX
guests to run with KVM acting as the hypervisor.
Among other things, KVM hypercall is used to send IPIs.
Since the KVM driver can be built as a kernel module, export
tdx_kvm_hypercall() to make the symbols visible to kvm.ko.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-20-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
TDX guests cannot do port I/O directly. The TDX module triggers a #VE
exception to let the guest kernel emulate port I/O by converting them
into TDCALLs to call the host.
But before IDT handlers are set up, port I/O cannot be emulated using
normal kernel #VE handlers. To support the #VE-based emulation during
this boot window, add a minimal early #VE handler support in early
exception handlers. This is similar to what AMD SEV does. This is
mainly to support earlyprintk's serial driver, as well as potentially
the VGA driver.
The early handler only supports I/O-related #VE exceptions. Unhandled or
failed exceptions will be handled via early_fixup_exceptions() (like
normal exception failures). At runtime I/O-related #VE exceptions (along
with other types) handled by virt_exception_kernel().
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-19-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
TDX hypervisors cannot emulate instructions directly. This includes
port I/O which is normally emulated in the hypervisor. All port I/O
instructions inside TDX trigger the #VE exception in the guest and
would be normally emulated there.
Use a hypercall to emulate port I/O. Extend the
tdx_handle_virt_exception() and add support to handle the #VE due to
port I/O instructions.
String I/O operations are not supported in TDX. Unroll them by declaring
CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO confidential computing attribute.
== Userspace Implications ==
The ioperm() facility allows userspace access to I/O instructions like
inb/outb. Among other things, this allows writing userspace device
drivers.
This series has no special handling for ioperm(). Users will be able to
successfully request I/O permissions but will induce a #VE on their
first I/O instruction which leads SIGSEGV. If this is undesirable users
can enable kernel lockdown feature with 'lockdown=integrity' kernel
command line option. It makes ioperm() fail.
More robust handling of this situation (denying ioperm() in all TDX
guests) will be addressed in follow-on work.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-18-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In non-TDX VMs, MMIO is implemented by providing the guest a mapping
which will cause a VMEXIT on access and then the VMM emulating the
instruction that caused the VMEXIT. That's not possible for TDX VM.
To emulate an instruction an emulator needs two things:
- R/W access to the register file to read/modify instruction arguments
and see RIP of the faulted instruction.
- Read access to memory where instruction is placed to see what to
emulate. In this case it is guest kernel text.
Both of them are not available to VMM in TDX environment:
- Register file is never exposed to VMM. When a TD exits to the module,
it saves registers into the state-save area allocated for that TD.
The module then scrubs these registers before returning execution
control to the VMM, to help prevent leakage of TD state.
- TDX does not allow guests to execute from shared memory. All executed
instructions are in TD-private memory. Being private to the TD, VMMs
have no way to access TD-private memory and no way to read the
instruction to decode and emulate it.
In TDX the MMIO regions are instead configured by VMM to trigger a #VE
exception in the guest.
Add #VE handling that emulates the MMIO instruction inside the guest and
converts it into a controlled hypercall to the host.
This approach is bad for performance. But, it has (virtually) no impact
on the size of the kernel image and will work for a wide variety of
drivers. This allows TDX deployments to use arbitrary devices and device
drivers, including virtio. TDX customers have asked for the capability
to use random devices in their deployments.
In other words, even if all of the work was done to paravirtualize all
x86 MMIO users and virtio, this approach would still be needed. There
is essentially no way to get rid of this code.
This approach is functional for all in-kernel MMIO users current and
future and does so with a minimal amount of code and kernel image bloat.
MMIO addresses can be used with any CPU instruction that accesses
memory. Address only MMIO accesses done via io.h helpers, such as
'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
Any CPU instruction that accesses memory can also be used to access
MMIO. However, by convention, MMIO access are typically performed via
io.h helpers such as 'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
The io.h helpers intentionally use a limited set of instructions when
accessing MMIO. This known, limited set of instructions makes MMIO
instruction decoding and emulation feasible in KVM hosts and SEV guests
today.
MMIO accesses performed without the io.h helpers are at the mercy of the
compiler. Compilers can and will generate a much more broad set of
instructions which can not practically be decoded and emulated. TDX
guests will oops if they encounter one of these decoding failures.
This means that TDX guests *must* use the io.h helpers to access MMIO.
This requirement is not new. Both KVM hosts and AMD SEV guests have the
same limitations on MMIO access.
=== Potential alternative approaches ===
== Paravirtualizing all MMIO ==
An alternative to letting MMIO induce a #VE exception is to avoid
the #VE in the first place. Similar to the port I/O case, it is
theoretically possible to paravirtualize MMIO accesses.
Like the exception-based approach offered here, a fully paravirtualized
approach would be limited to MMIO users that leverage common
infrastructure like the io.h macros.
However, any paravirtual approach would be patching approximately 120k
call sites. Any paravirtual approach would need to replace a bare memory
access instruction with (at least) a function call. With a conservative
overhead estimation of 5 bytes per call site (CALL instruction),
it leads to bloating code by 600k.
Many drivers will never be used in the TDX environment and the bloat
cannot be justified.
== Patching TDX drivers ==
Rather than touching the entire kernel, it might also be possible to
just go after drivers that use MMIO in TDX guests *and* are performance
critical to justify the effrort. Right now, that's limited only to virtio.
All virtio MMIO appears to be done through a single function, which
makes virtio eminently easy to patch.
This approach will be adopted in the future, removing the bulk of
MMIO #VEs. The #VE-based MMIO will remain serving non-virtio use cases.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In TDX guests, most CPUID leaf/sub-leaf combinations are virtualized
by the TDX module while some trigger #VE.
Implement the #VE handling for EXIT_REASON_CPUID by handing it through
the hypercall, which in turn lets the TDX module handle it by invoking
the host VMM.
More details on CPUID Virtualization can be found in the TDX module
specification, the section titled "CPUID Virtualization".
Note that VMM that handles the hypercall is not trusted. It can return
data that may steer the guest kernel in wrong direct. Only allow VMM
to control range reserved for hypervisor communication.
Return all-zeros for any CPUID outside the hypervisor range. It matches
CPU behaviour for non-supported leaf.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Use hypercall to emulate MSR read/write for the TDX platform.
There are two viable approaches for doing MSRs in a TD guest:
1. Execute the RDMSR/WRMSR instructions like most VMs and bare metal
do. Some will succeed, others will cause a #VE. All of those that
cause a #VE will be handled with a TDCALL.
2. Use paravirt infrastructure. The paravirt hook has to keep a list
of which MSRs would cause a #VE and use a TDCALL. All other MSRs
execute RDMSR/WRMSR instructions directly.
The second option can be ruled out because the list of MSRs was
challenging to maintain. That leaves option #1 as the only viable
solution for the minimal TDX support.
Kernel relies on the exception fixup machinery to handle MSR access
errors. #VE handler uses the same exception fixup code as #GP. It
covers MSR accesses along with other types of fixups.
For performance-critical MSR writes (like TSC_DEADLINE), future patches
will replace the WRMSR/#VE sequence with the direct TDCALL.
RDMSR and WRMSR specification details can be found in
Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain
Extensions (Intel TDX) specification, sec titled "TDG.VP.
VMCALL<Instruction.RDMSR>" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.WRMSR>".
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops
instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It
is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup
handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI)
before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()).
To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated
using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found
in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication
Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT].
In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is
used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not
work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to
be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of
safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case.
To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the
tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer
for a valid TDX guest.
Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding
safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls
only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for
safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) are delivered to TDX guests due to
specific guest actions which may happen in either user space or the
kernel:
* Specific instructions (WBINVD, for example)
* Specific MSR accesses
* Specific CPUID leaf accesses
* Access to specific guest physical addresses
Syscall entry code has a critical window where the kernel stack is not
yet set up. Any exception in this window leads to hard to debug issues
and can be exploited for privilege escalation. Exceptions in the NMI
entry code also cause issues. Returning from the exception handler with
IRET will re-enable NMIs and nested NMI will corrupt the NMI stack.
For these reasons, the kernel avoids #VEs during the syscall gap and
the NMI entry code. Entry code paths do not access TD-shared memory,
MMIO regions, use #VE triggering MSRs, instructions, or CPUID leaves
that might generate #VE. VMM can remove memory from TD at any point,
but access to unaccepted (or missing) private memory leads to VM
termination, not to #VE.
Similarly to page faults and breakpoints, #VEs are allowed in NMI
handlers once the kernel is ready to deal with nested NMIs.
During #VE delivery, all interrupts, including NMIs, are blocked until
TDGETVEINFO is called. It prevents #VE nesting until the kernel reads
the VE info.
TDGETVEINFO retrieves the #VE info from the TDX module, which also
clears the "#VE valid" flag. This must be done before anything else as
any #VE that occurs while the valid flag is set escalates to #DF by TDX
module. It will result in an oops.
Virtual NMIs are inhibited if the #VE valid flag is set. NMI will not be
delivered until TDGETVEINFO is called.
For now, convert unhandled #VE's (everything, until later in this
series) so that they appear just like a #GP by calling the
ve_raise_fault() directly. The ve_raise_fault() function is similar
to #GP handler and is responsible for sending SIGSEGV to userspace
and CPU die and notifying debuggers and other die chain users.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In TDX guests, by default memory is protected from host access. If a
guest needs to communicate with the VMM (like the I/O use case), it uses
a single bit in the physical address to communicate the protected/shared
attribute of the given page.
In the x86 ARCH code, __PHYSICAL_MASK macro represents the width of the
physical address in the given architecture. It is used in creating
physical PAGE_MASK for address bits in the kernel. Since in TDX guest,
a single bit is used as metadata, it needs to be excluded from valid
physical address bits to avoid using incorrect addresses bits in the
kernel.
Enable DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK to support updating the __PHYSICAL_MASK.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Confidential Computing (CC) features (like string I/O unroll support,
memory encryption/decryption support, etc) are conditionally enabled
in the kernel using cc_platform_has() API. Since TDX guests also need
to use these CC features, extend cc_platform_has() API and add TDX
guest-specific CC attributes support.
CC API also provides an interface to deal with encryption mask. Extend
it to cover TDX.
Details about which bit in the page table entry to be used to indicate
shared/private state is determined by using the TDINFO TDCALL.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these
are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs
like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer
expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall
mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX
specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL.
In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary
layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host
and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU
mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the
TDCALL instruction.
A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM.
The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is
used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate
with the VMM is called TDVMCALL.
Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM
(using the TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_module_call() - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via
TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_hypercall() - Used by the guest to request services from
the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL).
Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error
handling support for the TDCALL failure.
The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are
implemented in assembly in a .S file. The TDCALL ABI requires
shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be
awkward with inline assembly.
Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same
number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current
worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer
than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap)
instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse.
For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI
specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL
Interface".
Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
In preparation of extending cc_platform_has() API to support TDX guest,
use CPUID instruction to detect support for TDX guests in the early
boot code (via tdx_early_init()). Since copy_bootdata() is the first
user of cc_platform_has() API, detect the TDX guest status before it.
Define a synthetic feature flag (X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST) and set this
bit in a valid TDX guest platform.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
