| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The perf_lopwr_cb() function is called from the idle routines; there
is no RCU there, we must not enter tracing.
Use __always_inline, noidle annotations and existing no-trace methods.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195539.392862891@infradead.org
|
|
There have been various issues and limitations with the way perf uses
(task) contexts to track events. Most notable is the single hardware
PMU task context, which has resulted in a number of yucky things (both
proposed and merged).
Notably:
- HW breakpoint PMU
- ARM big.little PMU / Intel ADL PMU
- Intel Branch Monitoring PMU
- AMD IBS PMU
- S390 cpum_cf PMU
- PowerPC trace_imc PMU
*Current design:*
Currently we have a per task and per cpu perf_event_contexts:
task_struct::perf_events_ctxp[] <-> perf_event_context <-> perf_cpu_context
^ | ^ | ^
`---------------------------------' | `--> pmu ---'
v ^
perf_event ------'
Each task has an array of pointers to a perf_event_context. Each
perf_event_context has a direct relation to a PMU and a group of
events for that PMU. The task related perf_event_context's have a
pointer back to that task.
Each PMU has a per-cpu pointer to a per-cpu perf_cpu_context, which
includes a perf_event_context, which again has a direct relation to
that PMU, and a group of events for that PMU.
The perf_cpu_context also tracks which task context is currently
associated with that CPU and includes a few other things like the
hrtimer for rotation etc.
Each perf_event is then associated with its PMU and one
perf_event_context.
*Proposed design:*
New design proposed by this patch reduce to a single task context and
a single CPU context but adds some intermediate data-structures:
task_struct::perf_event_ctxp -> perf_event_context <- perf_cpu_context
^ | ^ ^
`---------------------------' | |
| | perf_cpu_pmu_context <--.
| `----. ^ |
| | | |
| v v |
| ,--> perf_event_pmu_context |
| | |
| | |
v v |
perf_event ---> pmu ----------------'
With the new design, perf_event_context will hold all events for all
pmus in the (respective pinned/flexible) rbtrees. This can be achieved
by adding pmu to rbtree key:
{cpu, pmu, cgroup, group_index}
Each perf_event_context carries a list of perf_event_pmu_context which
is used to hold per-pmu-per-context state. For example, it keeps track
of currently active events for that pmu, a pmu specific task_ctx_data,
a flag to tell whether rotation is required or not etc.
Additionally, perf_cpu_pmu_context is used to hold per-pmu-per-cpu
state like hrtimer details to drive the event rotation, a pointer to
perf_event_pmu_context of currently running task and some other
ancillary information.
Each perf_event is associated to it's pmu, perf_event_context and
perf_event_pmu_context.
Further optimizations to current implementation are possible. For
example, ctx_resched() can be optimized to reschedule only single pmu
events.
Much thanks to Ravi for picking this up and pushing it towards
completion.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221008062424.313-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
|
|
Move some of the Branch Sampling (BRS) specific functions out of the Core
events sources and into the BRS sources in preparation for adding other
mechanisms to record branches.
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b60283b57179475d18ee242d117c335c16733693.1660211399.git.sandipan.das@amd.com
|
|
This fires on a Fam16h machine here:
unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc000010f (tried to write 0x0000000000000018) \
at rIP: 0xffffffff81007db1 (amd_brs_reset+0x11/0x50)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
amd_pmu_cpu_starting
? x86_pmu_dead_cpu
x86_pmu_starting_cpu
cpuhp_invoke_callback
? x86_pmu_starting_cpu
? x86_pmu_dead_cpu
cpuhp_issue_call
? x86_pmu_starting_cpu
__cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked
? x86_pmu_dead_cpu
? x86_pmu_starting_cpu
__cpuhp_setup_state
? map_vsyscall
init_hw_perf_events
? map_vsyscall
do_one_initcall
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
? try_to_wake_up
kernel_init_freeable
? rest_init
kernel_init
ret_from_fork
because that CPU hotplug callback gets executed on any AMD CPU - not
only on the BRS-enabled ones. Check the BRS feature bit properly.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-By: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220516154838.7044-1-bp@alien8.de
|
|
On AMD Fam19h Zen3, the branch sampling (BRS) feature must be disabled before
entering low power and re-enabled (if was active) when returning from low
power. Otherwise, the NMI interrupt may be held up for too long and cause
problems. Stopping BRS will cause the NMI to be delivered if it was held up.
Define a perf_amd_brs_lopwr_cb() callback to stop/restart BRS. The callback
is protected by a jump label which is enabled only when AMD BRS is detected.
In all other cases, the callback is never called.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
[peterz: static_call() and build fixes]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322221517.2510440-10-eranian@google.com
|
|
The AMD Branch Sampling features does not provide hardware filtering by
privilege level. The associated PMU counter does but not the branch sampling
by itself. Given how BRS operates there is a possibility that BRS captures
kernel level branches even though the event is programmed to count only at
the user level.
Implement a workaround in software by removing the branches which belong to
the wrong privilege level. The privilege level is evaluated on the target of
the branch and not the source so as to be compatible with other architectures.
As a consequence of this patch, the number of entries in the
PERF_RECORD_BRANCH_STACK buffer may be less than the maximum (16). It could
even be zero. Another consequence is that consecutive entries in the branch
stack may not reflect actual code path and may have discontinuities, in case
kernel branches were suppressed. But this is no different than what happens
on other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322221517.2510440-6-eranian@google.com
|
|
Add support for the AMD Fam19h 16-deep branch sampling feature as
described in the AMD PPR Fam19h Model 01h Revision B1. This is a model
specific extension. It is not an architected AMD feature.
The Branch Sampling (BRS) operates with a 16-deep saturating buffer in MSR
registers. There is no branch type filtering. All control flow changes are
captured. BRS relies on specific programming of the core PMU of Fam19h. In
particular, the following requirements must be met:
- the sampling period be greater than 16 (BRS depth)
- the sampling period must use a fixed and not frequency mode
BRS interacts with the NMI interrupt as well. Because enabling BRS is
expensive, it is only activated after P event occurrences, where P is the
desired sampling period. At P occurrences of the event, the counter
overflows, the CPU catches the interrupt, activates BRS for 16 branches until
it saturates, and then delivers the NMI to the kernel. Between the overflow
and the time BRS activates more branches may be executed skewing the period.
All along, the sampling event keeps counting. The skid may be attenuated by
reducing the sampling period by 16 (subsequent patch).
BRS is integrated into perf_events seamlessly via the same
PERF_RECORD_BRANCH_STACK sample format. BRS generates perf_branch_entry
records in the sampling buffer. No prediction information is supported. The
branches are stored in reverse order of execution. The most recent branch is
the first entry in each record.
No modification to the perf tool is necessary.
BRS can be used with any sampling event. However, it is recommended to use
the RETIRED_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS event because it matches what the BRS
captures.
$ perf record -b -c 1000037 -e cpu/event=0xc2,name=ret_br_instructions/ test
$ perf report -D
56531696056126 0x193c000 [0x1a8]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 18122/18230: 0x401d24 period: 1000037 addr: 0
... branch stack: nr:16
..... 0: 0000000000401d24 -> 0000000000401d5a 0 cycles 0
..... 1: 0000000000401d5c -> 0000000000401d24 0 cycles 0
..... 2: 0000000000401d22 -> 0000000000401d5c 0 cycles 0
..... 3: 0000000000401d5e -> 0000000000401d22 0 cycles 0
..... 4: 0000000000401d20 -> 0000000000401d5e 0 cycles 0
..... 5: 0000000000401d3e -> 0000000000401d20 0 cycles 0
..... 6: 0000000000401d42 -> 0000000000401d3e 0 cycles 0
..... 7: 0000000000401d3c -> 0000000000401d42 0 cycles 0
..... 8: 0000000000401d44 -> 0000000000401d3c 0 cycles 0
..... 9: 0000000000401d3a -> 0000000000401d44 0 cycles 0
..... 10: 0000000000401d46 -> 0000000000401d3a 0 cycles 0
..... 11: 0000000000401d38 -> 0000000000401d46 0 cycles 0
..... 12: 0000000000401d48 -> 0000000000401d38 0 cycles 0
..... 13: 0000000000401d36 -> 0000000000401d48 0 cycles 0
..... 14: 0000000000401d4a -> 0000000000401d36 0 cycles 0
..... 15: 0000000000401d34 -> 0000000000401d4a 0 cycles 0
... thread: test:18230
...... dso: test
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322221517.2510440-4-eranian@google.com
|
