summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-08x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitionsRicardo Neri
User-Mode Instruction Prevention is a security feature present in new Intel processors that, when set, prevents the execution of a subset of instructions if such instructions are executed in user mode (CPL > 0). Attempting to execute such instructions causes a general protection exception. The subset of instructions comprises: * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table * SMSW - Store Machine Status Word * STR - Store Task Register This feature is also added to the list of disabled-features to allow a cleaner handling of build-time configuration. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-7-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-07-05x86/mm: Disable PCID on 32-bit kernelsAndy Lutomirski
32-bit kernels on new hardware will see PCID in CPUID, but PCID can only be used in 64-bit mode. Rather than making all PCID code conditional, just disable the feature on 32-bit builds. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2e391769192a4d31b808410c383c6bf0734bc6ea.1498751203.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-04x86/boot: Detect 5-level paging supportKirill A. Shutemov
In this initial implementation we force-require 5-level paging support from the hardware, when compiled with CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y. (The kernel will panic during boot on CPUs that don't support 5-level paging.) We will implement boot-time switch between 4- and 5-level paging later. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170330080731.65421-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-30x86/cpufeature: Make sure DISABLED/REQUIRED macros are updatedDave Hansen
x86 has two macros which allow us to evaluate some CPUID-based features at compile time: REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET() They're both defined by having the compiler check the bit argument against some constant masks of features. But, when adding new CPUID leaves, we need to check new words for these macros. So make sure that those macros and the REQUIRED_MASK* and DISABLED_MASK* get updated when necessary. This looks kinda silly to have an open-coded value ("18" in this case) open-coded in 5 places in the code. But, we really do need 5 places updated when NCAPINTS gets bumped, so now we just force the issue. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200108.92466F6F@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-30x86/cpufeature: Update cpufeaure macrosDave Hansen
We had a new CPUID "NCAPINT" word added, but the REQUIRED_MASK and DISABLED_MASK macros did not get updated. Update them. None of the features was needed in these masks, so there was no harm, but we should keep them updated anyway. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200107.8D3C9A31@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-05-16x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Fix broken compile-time disabling of pkeysDave Hansen
When I added support for the Memory Protection Keys processor feature, I had to reindent the REQUIRED/DISABLED_MASK macros, and also consult the later cpufeature words. I'm not quite sure how I bungled it, but I consulted the wrong word at the end. This only affected required or disabled cpu features in cpufeature words 14, 15 and 16. So, only Protection Keys itself was screwed over here. The result was that if you disabled pkeys in your .config, you might still see some code show up that should have been compiled out. There should be no functional problems, though. In verifying this patch I also realized that the DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE macros were defined backwards and that the cpu_has() check in setup_pku() was not doing the compile-time disabled checks. So also fix the macro for DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE and add a compile-time check for pkeys being enabled in setup_pku(). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Fixes: dfb4a70f20c5 ("x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513221328.C200930B@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-02-16x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitionsDave Hansen
There are two CPUID bits for protection keys. One is for whether the CPU contains the feature, and the other will appear set once the OS enables protection keys. Specifically: Bit 04: OSPKE. If 1, OS has set CR4.PKE to enable Protection keys (and the RDPKRU/WRPKRU instructions) This is because userspace can not see CR4 contents, but it can see CPUID contents. X86_FEATURE_PKU is referred to as "PKU" in the hardware documentation: CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.PKU [bit 3] X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is "OSPKU": CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.OSPKE [bit 4] These are the first CPU features which need to look at the ECX word in CPUID leaf 0x7, so this patch also includes fetching that word in to the cpuinfo->x86_capability[] array. Add it to the disabled-features mask when its config option is off. Even though we are not using it here, we also extend the REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() macro to keep it mirroring the DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET() version. This means that in almost all code, you should use: cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU) and *not* the CONFIG option. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210201.7714C250@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-11-18x86, mpx: Add MPX to disabled featuresDave Hansen
This allows us to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) as both a runtime and compile-time check. When CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX is disabled, cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) will evaluate at compile-time to 0. If CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX=y, then the cpuid flag will be checked at runtime. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114151823.B358EAD2@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-09-11x86: Add more disabled featuresDave Hansen
The original motivation for these patches was for an Intel CPU feature called MPX. The patch to add a disabled feature for it will go in with the other parts of the support. But, in the meantime, there are a few other features than MPX that we can make assumptions about at compile-time based on compile options. Add them to disabled-features.h and check them with cpu_feature_enabled(). Note that this gets rid of the last things that needed an #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 in cpufeature.h. Yay! Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211524.C0EC332A@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-09-11x86: Introduce disabled-featuresDave Hansen
I believe the REQUIRED_MASK aproach was taken so that it was easier to consult in assembly (arch/x86/kernel/verify_cpu.S). DISABLED_MASK does not have the same restriction, but I implemented it the same way for consistency. We have a REQUIRED_MASK... which does two things: 1. Keeps a list of cpuid bits to check in very early boot and refuse to boot if those are not present. 2. Consulted during cpu_has() checks, which allows us to optimize out things at compile-time. In other words, if we *KNOW* we will not boot with the feature off, then we can safely assume that it will be present forever. But, we don't have a similar mechanism for CPU features which may be present but that we know we will not use. We simply use our existing mechanisms to repeatedly check the status of the bit at runtime (well, the alternatives patching helps here but it does not provide compile-time optimization). Adding a feature to disabled-features.h allows the bit to be checked via a new macro: cpu_feature_enabled(). Note that for features in DISABLED_MASK, checks with this macro have all of the benefits of an #ifdef. Before, we would have done this in a header: #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX #define cpu_has_mpx cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX) #else #define cpu_has_mpx 0 #endif and this in the code: if (cpu_has_mpx) do_some_mpx_thing(); Now, just add your feature to DISABLED_MASK and you can do this everywhere, and get the same benefits you would have from #ifdefs: if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX)) do_some_mpx_thing(); We need a new function and *not* a modification to cpu_has() because there are cases where we actually need to check the CPU itself, despite what features the kernel supports. The best example of this is a hypervisor which has no control over what features its guests are using and where the guest does not depend on the host for support. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211513.9E35E931@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>