| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
On x86, topology_core_id() returns a unique core ID within the PKG
domain. Looking at match_smt() suggests that a core ID just needs to be
unique within a LLC domain. For use cases such as the core RAPL PMU,
there exists a need for a unique core ID across the entire system with
multiple PKG domains. Introduce topology_logical_core_id() to derive a
unique core ID across the system.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
|
|
Sometimes it is required to take actions based on if a CPU is a performance or
efficiency core. As an example, intel_pstate driver uses the Intel core-type
to determine CPU scaling. Also, some CPU vulnerabilities only affect
a specific CPU type, like RFDS only affects Intel Atom. Hybrid systems that
have variants P+E, P-only(Core) and E-only(Atom), it is not straightforward to
identify which variant is affected by a type specific vulnerability.
Such processors do have CPUID field that can uniquely identify them. Like,
P+E, P-only and E-only enumerates CPUID.1A.CORE_TYPE identification, while P+E
additionally enumerates CPUID.7.HYBRID. Based on this information, it is
possible for boot CPU to identify if a system has mixed CPU types.
Add a new field hw_cpu_type to struct cpuinfo_topology that stores the
hardware specific CPU type. This saves the overhead of IPIs to get the CPU
type of a different CPU. CPU type is populated early in the boot process,
before vulnerabilities are enumerated.
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025171459.1093-5-mario.limonciello@amd.com
|
|
The local APICs have not yet been enumerated so the logical ID evaluation
from the topology bitmaps does not work and would return an error code.
Skip the evaluation during the early boot CPUID evaluation and only apply
it on the final run.
Fixes: 380414be78bf ("x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322185305.186943142@linutronix.de
|
|
Now that __num_cores_per_package and __num_threads_per_package are
available, cpuinfo::x86_max_cores and the related math all over the place
can be replaced with the ready to consume data.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210253.176147806@linutronix.de
|
|
Similar to other sizing information the number of cores per package can be
established from the topology bitmap.
Provide a function for retrieving that information and replace the buggy
hack in the CPUID evaluation with it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.956858282@linutronix.de
|
|
Replace the logical package and die management functionality and retrieve
the logical IDs from the topology bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.901865302@linutronix.de
|
|
Now that all possible APIC IDs are tracked in the topology bitmaps, its
trivial to retrieve the real information from there.
This gets rid of the guesstimates for the maximal packages and dies per
package as the actual numbers can be determined before a single AP has been
brought up.
The number of SMT threads can now be determined correctly from the bitmaps
in all situations. Up to now a system which has SMT disabled in the BIOS
will still claim that it is SMT capable, because the lowest APIC ID bit is
reserved for that and CPUID leaf 0xb/0x1f still enumerates the SMT domain
accordingly. By calculating the bitmap weights of the SMT and the CORE
domain and setting them into relation the SMT disabled in BIOS situation
reports correctly that the system is not SMT capable.
It also handles the situation correctly when a hybrid systems boot CPU does
not have SMT as it takes the SMT capability of the APs fully into account.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.681709880@linutronix.de
|
|
It turns out that XEN/PV Dom0 has halfways usable CPUID/MADT enumeration
except that it cannot deal with CPUs which are enumerated as disabled in
MADT.
DomU has no MADT and provides at least rudimentary topology information in
CPUID leaves 1 and 4.
For both it's important that there are not more possible Linux CPUs than
vCPUs provided by the hypervisor.
As this is ensured by counting the vCPUs before enumeration happens:
- lift the restrictions in the CPUID evaluation and the MADT parser
- Utilize MADT registration for Dom0
- Keep the fake APIC ID registration for DomU
- Fix the XEN APIC fake so the readout of the local APIC ID works for
Dom0 via the hypercall and for DomU by returning the registered
fake APIC IDs.
With that the XEN/PV fake approximates usefulness.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.626195405@linutronix.de
|
|
Detect all possible combinations of mismatch right in the CPUID evaluation
code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.867699078@linutronix.de
|
|
Now that everything is converted switch it over and remove the intermediate
operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.334185785@linutronix.de
|
|
Switch it over to use the consolidated topology evaluation and remove the
temporary safe guards which are not longer needed.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.207750409@linutronix.de
|
|
Switch it over to the new topology evaluation mechanism and remove the
random bits and pieces which are sprinkled all over the place.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.145745053@linutronix.de
|
|
AMD/HYGON uses various methods for topology evaluation:
- Leaf 0x80000008 and 0x8000001e based with an optional leaf 0xb,
which is the preferred variant for modern CPUs.
Leaf 0xb will be superseded by leaf 0x80000026 soon, which is just
another variant of the Intel 0x1f leaf for whatever reasons.
- Subleaf 0x80000008 and NODEID_MSR base
- Legacy fallback
That code is following the principle of random bits and pieces all over the
place which results in multiple evaluations and impenetrable code flows in
the same way as the Intel parsing did.
Provide a sane implementation by clearly separating the three variants and
bringing them in the proper preference order in one place.
This provides the parsing for both AMD and HYGON because there is no point
in having a separate HYGON parser which only differs by 3 lines of
code. Any further divergence between AMD and HYGON can be handled in
different functions, while still sharing the existing parsers.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.020038641@linutronix.de
|
|
Intel CPUs use either topology leaf 0xb/0x1f evaluation or the legacy
SMP/HT evaluation based on CPUID leaf 0x1/0x4.
Move it over to the consolidated topology code and remove the random
topology hacks which are sprinkled into the Intel and the common code.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.893644349@linutronix.de
|
|
Centaur and Zhaoxin CPUs use only the legacy SMP detection. Remove the
invocations from their 32bit path and exclude them from the 64-bit call
path.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.706794189@linutronix.de
|
|
The legacy topology detection via CPUID leaf 4, which provides the number
of cores in the package and CPUID leaf 1 which provides the number of
logical CPUs in case that FEATURE_HT is enabled and the CMP_LEGACY feature
is not set, is shared for Intel, Centaur and Zhaoxin CPUs.
Lift the code from common.c without the early detection hack and provide it
as common fallback mechanism.
Will be utilized in later changes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.644448852@linutronix.de
|
|
Topology evaluation is a complete disaster and impenetrable mess. It's
scattered all over the place with some vendor implementations doing early
evaluation and some not. The most horrific part is the permanent
overwriting of smt_max_siblings and __max_die_per_package, instead of
establishing them once on the boot CPU and validating the result on the
APs.
The goals are:
- One topology evaluation entry point
- Proper sharing of pointlessly duplicated code
- Proper structuring of the evaluation logic and preferences.
- Evaluating important system wide information only once on the boot CPU
- Making the 0xb/0x1f leaf parsing less convoluted and actually fixing
the short comings of leaf 0x1f evaluation.
Start to consolidate the topology evaluation code by providing the entry
points for the early boot CPU evaluation and for the final parsing on the
boot CPU and the APs.
Move the trivial pieces into that new code:
- The initialization of cpuinfo_x86::topo
- The evaluation of CPUID leaf 1, which presets topo::initial_apicid
- topo_apicid is set to topo::initial_apicid when invoked from early
boot. When invoked for the final evaluation on the boot CPU it reads
the actual APIC ID, which makes apic_get_initial_apicid() obsolete
once everything is converted over.
Provide a temporary helper function topo_converted() which shields off the
not yet converted CPU vendors from invoking code which would break them.
This shielding covers all vendor CPUs which support SMP, but not the
historical pure UP ones as they only need the topology info init and
eventually the initial APIC initialization.
Provide two new members in cpuinfo_x86::topo to store the maximum number of
SMT siblings and the number of dies per package and add them to the debugfs
readout. These two members will be used to populate this information on the
boot CPU and to validate the APs against it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.581436579@linutronix.de
|
