summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-02-26Merge tag 'efi-next' of ↵Ingo Molnar
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi into efi/core Pull EFI updates for v5.7 from Ard Biesheuvel: This time, the set of changes for the EFI subsystem is much larger than usual. The main reasons are: - Get things cleaned up before EFI support for RISC-V arrives, which will increase the size of the validation matrix, and therefore the threshold to making drastic changes, - After years of defunct maintainership, the GRUB project has finally started to consider changes from the distros regarding UEFI boot, some of which are highly specific to the way x86 does UEFI secure boot and measured boot, based on knowledge of both shim internals and the layout of bootparams and the x86 setup header. Having this maintenance burden on other architectures (which don't need shim in the first place) is hard to justify, so instead, we are introducing a generic Linux/UEFI boot protocol. Summary of changes: - Boot time GDT handling changes (Arvind) - Simplify handling of EFI properties table on arm64 - Generic EFI stub cleanups, to improve command line handling, file I/O, memory allocation, etc. - Introduce a generic initrd loading method based on calling back into the firmware, instead of relying on the x86 EFI handover protocol or device tree. - Introduce a mixed mode boot method that does not rely on the x86 EFI handover protocol either, and could potentially be adopted by other architectures (if another one ever surfaces where one execution mode is a superset of another) - Clean up the contents of struct efi, and move out everything that doesn't need to be stored there. - Incorporate support for UEFI spec v2.8A changes that permit firmware implementations to return EFI_UNSUPPORTED from UEFI runtime services at OS runtime, and expose a mask of which ones are supported or unsupported via a configuration table. - Various documentation updates and minor code cleanups (Heinrich) - Partial fix for the lack of by-VA cache maintenance in the decompressor on 32-bit ARM. Note that these patches were deliberately put at the beginning so they can be used as a stable branch that will be shared with a PR containing the complete fix, which I will send to the ARM tree. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-02-23x86/ima: Use EFI GetVariable only when availableArd Biesheuvel
Replace the EFI runtime services check with one that tells us whether EFI GetVariable() is implemented by the firmware. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2020-02-11x86/ima: use correct identifier for SetupMode variableArd Biesheuvel
The IMA arch code attempts to inspect the "SetupMode" EFI variable by populating a variable called efi_SetupMode_name with the string "SecureBoot" and passing that to the EFI GetVariable service, which obviously does not yield the expected result. Given that the string is only referenced a single time, let's get rid of the intermediate variable, and pass the correct string as an immediate argument. While at it, do the same for "SecureBoot". Fixes: 399574c64eaf ("x86/ima: retry detecting secure boot mode") Fixes: 980ef4d22a95 ("x86/ima: check EFI SetupMode too") Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.3 Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2019-09-28Merge branch 'next-lockdown' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security Pull kernel lockdown mode from James Morris: "This is the latest iteration of the kernel lockdown patchset, from Matthew Garrett, David Howells and others. From the original description: This patchset introduces an optional kernel lockdown feature, intended to strengthen the boundary between UID 0 and the kernel. When enabled, various pieces of kernel functionality are restricted. Applications that rely on low-level access to either hardware or the kernel may cease working as a result - therefore this should not be enabled without appropriate evaluation beforehand. The majority of mainstream distributions have been carrying variants of this patchset for many years now, so there's value in providing a doesn't meet every distribution requirement, but gets us much closer to not requiring external patches. There are two major changes since this was last proposed for mainline: - Separating lockdown from EFI secure boot. Background discussion is covered here: https://lwn.net/Articles/751061/ - Implementation as an LSM, with a default stackable lockdown LSM module. This allows the lockdown feature to be policy-driven, rather than encoding an implicit policy within the mechanism. The new locked_down LSM hook is provided to allow LSMs to make a policy decision around whether kernel functionality that would allow tampering with or examining the runtime state of the kernel should be permitted. The included lockdown LSM provides an implementation with a simple policy intended for general purpose use. This policy provides a coarse level of granularity, controllable via the kernel command line: lockdown={integrity|confidentiality} Enable the kernel lockdown feature. If set to integrity, kernel features that allow userland to modify the running kernel are disabled. If set to confidentiality, kernel features that allow userland to extract confidential information from the kernel are also disabled. This may also be controlled via /sys/kernel/security/lockdown and overriden by kernel configuration. New or existing LSMs may implement finer-grained controls of the lockdown features. Refer to the lockdown_reason documentation in include/linux/security.h for details. The lockdown feature has had signficant design feedback and review across many subsystems. This code has been in linux-next for some weeks, with a few fixes applied along the way. Stephen Rothwell noted that commit 9d1f8be5cf42 ("bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in confidentiality mode") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. Matthew responded that he is providing this under category (c) of the DCO" * 'next-lockdown' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security: (31 commits) kexec: Fix file verification on S390 security: constify some arrays in lockdown LSM lockdown: Print current->comm in restriction messages efi: Restrict efivar_ssdt_load when the kernel is locked down tracefs: Restrict tracefs when the kernel is locked down debugfs: Restrict debugfs when the kernel is locked down kexec: Allow kexec_file() with appropriate IMA policy when locked down lockdown: Lock down perf when in confidentiality mode bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in confidentiality mode lockdown: Lock down tracing and perf kprobes when in confidentiality mode lockdown: Lock down /proc/kcore x86/mmiotrace: Lock down the testmmiotrace module lockdown: Lock down module params that specify hardware parameters (eg. ioport) lockdown: Lock down TIOCSSERIAL lockdown: Prohibit PCMCIA CIS storage when the kernel is locked down acpi: Disable ACPI table override if the kernel is locked down acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel param when the kernel has been locked down ACPI: Limit access to custom_method when the kernel is locked down x86/msr: Restrict MSR access when the kernel is locked down x86: Lock down IO port access when the kernel is locked down ...
2019-08-19kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG_FORCEJiri Bohac
This is a preparatory patch for kexec_file_load() lockdown. A locked down kernel needs to prevent unsigned kernel images from being loaded with kexec_file_load(). Currently, the only way to force the signature verification is compiling with KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG. This prevents loading usigned images even when the kernel is not locked down at runtime. This patch splits KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG_FORCE. Analogous to the MODULE_SIG and MODULE_SIG_FORCE for modules, KEXEC_SIG turns on the signature verification but allows unsigned images to be loaded. KEXEC_SIG_FORCE disallows images without a valid signature. Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2019-05-29x86/ima: check EFI SetupMode tooMimi Zohar
Checking "SecureBoot" mode is not sufficient, also check "SetupMode". Fixes: 399574c64eaf ("x86/ima: retry detecting secure boot mode") Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2019-05-19x86/ima: Check EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES before usingScott Wood
Checking efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) is not sufficient to ensure that EFI runtime services are available, e.g. if efi=noruntime is used. Without this, I get an oops on a PREEMPT_RT kernel where efi=noruntime is the default. Fixes: 399574c64eaf94e8 ("x86/ima: retry detecting secure boot mode") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (linux-5.0) Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2019-04-10x86/ima: add missing includeMimi Zohar
As reported by 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure: arch/x86//kernel/ima_arch.c: In function 'arch_get_ima_policy': >> arch/x86//kernel/ima_arch.c:78:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_module_sig_enforced' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2019-03-27x86/ima: require signed kernel modulesMimi Zohar
Have the IMA architecture specific policy require signed kernel modules on systems with secure boot mode enabled; and coordinate the different signature verification methods, so only one signature is required. Requiring appended kernel module signatures may be configured, enabled on the boot command line, or with this patch enabled in secure boot mode. This patch defines set_module_sig_enforced(). To coordinate between appended kernel module signatures and IMA signatures, only define an IMA MODULE_CHECK policy rule if CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is not enabled. A custom IMA policy may still define and require an IMA signature. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
2018-12-11x86/ima: retry detecting secure boot modeMimi Zohar
The secure boot mode may not be detected on boot for some reason (eg. buggy firmware). This patch attempts one more time to detect the secure boot mode. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2018-12-11x86/ima: define arch_get_ima_policy() for x86Eric Richter
On x86, there are two methods of verifying a kexec'ed kernel image signature being loaded via the kexec_file_load syscall - an architecture specific implementaton or a IMA KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraisal rule. Neither of these methods verify the kexec'ed kernel image signature being loaded via the kexec_load syscall. Secure boot enabled systems require kexec images to be signed. Therefore, this patch loads an IMA KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK policy rule on secure boot enabled systems not configured with CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG enabled. When IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM is configured, different IMA appraise modes (eg. fix, log) can be specified on the boot command line, allowing unsigned or invalidly signed kernel images to be kexec'ed. This patch permits enabling IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM or IMA_ARCH_POLICY, but not both. Signed-off-by: Eric Richter <erichte@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
2018-11-13x86/ima: define arch_ima_get_securebootNayna Jain
Distros are concerned about totally disabling the kexec_load syscall. As a compromise, the kexec_load syscall will only be disabled when CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is configured and the system is booted with secureboot enabled. This patch defines the new arch specific function called arch_ima_get_secureboot() to retrieve the secureboot state of the system. Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> Suggested-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>