| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
To avoid arch-specific code in general ACPI initialization flow,
introduce a weak symbol acpi_arch_init().
Currently, arm64 and riscv can utillize this to insert their
arch-specific flow.
In the future, other architectures can also have a chance to define
their own arch-specific ACPI initialization process if necessary.
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Wang <shankerwangmiao@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241121-intro-acpi-arch-init-v4-1-b1fb517e7d8b@gmail.com
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
RISC-V has PLIC and APLIC in MADT as well as namespace devices.
Initialize the list of those structures using MADT and namespace devices
to create mapping between the ACPI handle and the GSI ranges. This will
be used later to add dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240812005929.113499-12-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add a new function for RISC-V to do architecture specific initialization
similar to acpi_arm_init(). Some of the ACPI tables are architecture
specific and there is no reason trying to find them on other
architectures. So, add acpi_riscv_init() similar to acpi_arm_init().
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240812005929.113499-4-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
