| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
No more users.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104093609.156059-7-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
There is no reason to keep deprecated legacy API implementations
in the gpiolib-devres.c. Consolidate devm_gpio_*() with other legacy
APIs. While at it, clean up header inclusion block in gpiolib-devres.c.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828151357.2677340-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
$ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall drivers/gpio/gpiolib* 2>&1 | grep -w warning | wc -l
67
Fix these by adding Return sections. While at it, make sure all of
Return sections use the same style.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828164449.2777666-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Besides the fact that (old) drivers use wrong definitions, e.g.,
GPIOF_DIR_IN instead of GPIOF_IN, shrink the legacy definitions
by killing those GPIOF_DIR_* completely.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828142554.2424189-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Besides the fact that (old) drivers use wrong definitions, e.g.,
GPIOF_INIT_HIGH instead of GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, shrink the legacy
definitions by killing those GPIOF_INIT_* completely.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828142554.2424189-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
In the cases when gpio_is_valid() is called with unsigned parameter
the result is always true in the GPIO library code, hence the check
for false won't ever be true. Get rid of such calls.
While at it, move GPIO device base to be unsigned to clearly show
it won't ever be negative. This requires a new definition for the
maximum GPIO number in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
No more users.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
We've recently had someone try to use of_get_named_gpio() in new code.
Mark legacy interfaces as deprecated in kernel docs to avoid any
confusion.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
There is no use of the GPIOF_OPEN_* in the kernel. Kill it for good.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
There is no use of the GPIOF_EXPORT in the kernel. Kill it for good.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Use the SPDX headers and cut down on boilerplate to indicate the
license in the core gpiolib implementation.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 923b93e451db876d1479d3e4458fce14fec31d1c.
Make sure consumers do not overwrite gpio flags for pins that have
already been claimed.
While adding support for gpio drivers to refuse a request using
unsupported flags, the order of when the requested flag was checked and
the new flags were applied was reversed to that consumers could
overwrite flags for already requested gpios.
This not only affects device-tree setups where two drivers could request
the same gpio using conflicting configurations, but also allowed user
space to clear gpio flags for already claimed pins simply by attempting
to export them through the sysfs interface. By for example clearing the
FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW flag this way, user space could effectively change the
polarity of a signal.
Reverting this change obviously prevents gpio drivers from doing sanity
checks on the flags in their request callbacks. Fortunately only one
recently added driver (gpio-tps65218 in v4.6) appears to do this, and a
follow up patch could restore this functionality through a different
interface.
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
When requesting a GPIO through the legacy or the gpiod_* API the
gpiochip request operation is first called and then the GPIO flags are
parsed and the GPIO is configured. This prevents the gpiochip from
rejecting the request if the flags are not supported by the device.
To fix this split the parse-and-configure operation in two and parse
flags before requesting the GPIO.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 14e85c0e69d5 ("gpio: remove gpio_descs global array") changed
gpio_to_desc()'s behavior to return NULL not only for GPIOs numbers
not in the valid range, but also for all GPIOs whose controller has not
been probed yet. Although this behavior is more correct (nothing hints
that these GPIO numbers will be populated later), this affects
gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() which call gpiod_request() with a
NULL descriptor, causing it to return -EINVAL instead of the expected
-EPROBE_DEFER for a non-probed GPIO.
gpiod_request() is only called with a descriptor obtained from
gpio_to_desc() from these two functions, so address the issue there.
Other ways to obtain GPIOs rely on well-defined mappings and can thus
return -EPROBE_DEFER only for relevant GPIOs, and are thus not affected
by this issue.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
gpio_ensure_requested() has been introduced in Feb. 2008 by commit
d2876d08d86f2 to force users of the GPIO API to explicitly request GPIOs
before using them.
Hopefully by now all GPIOs are correctly requested and this extra check
can be omitted ; in any case the GPIO maintainers won't feel bad if
machines start failing after 6 years of warnings.
This patch removes that function from the dark ages.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
gpio_ensure_requested() only makes sense when using the integer-based
GPIO API, so make sure it is called from there instead of the gpiod
API which we know cannot be called with a non-requested GPIO anyway.
The uses of gpio_ensure_requested() in the gpiod API were kind of
out-of-place anyway, so putting them in gpio-legacy.c helps clearing the
code.
Actually, considering the time this ensure_requested mechanism has been
around, maybe we should just turn this patch into "remove
gpio_ensure_requested()" if we know for sure that no user depend on it
anymore?
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
gpio_lock/unlock_as_irq() are working with (chip, offset) arguments and
are thus not using the old integer namespace. Therefore, there is no
reason to have gpiod variants of these functions working with
descriptors, especially since the (chip, offset) tuple is more suitable
to the users of these functions (GPIO drivers, whereas GPIO descriptors
are targeted at GPIO consumers).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The gpio include file and the gpio documentation declare and document
GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as one of the flags to be passed to gpio_request_one
and related functions. However, the flag is not evaluated or used.
This can cause problems in at least two areas: First, the same API can
be used to auto-export pins to user space. The missing support for
GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW results in unexpected behavior for such auto-exported
pins. Second, the requested gpio pin can be convered for use by
gpiod functions with gpio_to_desc(). While gpio API functions do not
support GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW, gpiod functions do, which again results in
unexpected behavior.
Check the flag in gpio_request_one and set the gpio internal flag
FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW if it is set to address those problems.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The old integer GPIO interface is, in effect, a privileged user of the
gpiod interface. Reflect this fact further by moving legacy GPIO support
into its own source file. This makes the code clearer and will allow us
to disable legacy GPIO support in the (far) future.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
