| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[Why]
When we disable a connector we don't explicitly remove it from the module so the
display is still cached(SW) in the hdcp_module.
SST: no issues because we can only have 1 display per link
MST: We have x displays per link, now if we disable 1 we don't remove it from the
module so the module has x display cached(SW).
If we try to enable HDCP, psp verification will fail because we are reporting x
displays while the HW only has x-1 display enabled
[How]
Check the callback for when we disable stream and call remove display.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
previously event_property_validate was only called after we enabled the display.
But after "Refactor HDCP to handle multiple displays per link" this function
can be called at any time. In certain cases we don't have a aconnector
[How]
Null check aconnector and exit early. This is ok because we only need to check the
ENABLED->DESIRED transition if a connector exists.
Fixes: b1abe5586ffc ("drm/amd/display: Refactor HDCP to handle multiple displays per link")
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
The old way was to poll PSP and update the properties. But due to a
limitation in the PSP interface this doesn't work for MST.
[How]
According to PSP if set_encryption return success, the link is encrypted
and the only way it will not be is if we get a link loss(which we handle
already).
So this method should be good enough to report HDCP status.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
Before we had a disable_type1 flag, this forced HDCP 2.2 to type0
There was no way to force type1.
[How]
Remove disable_type1 flag and instead add a flag to force type0/1.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to do this to support HDCP over MST
Currently we save a display per link, in a MST case we need to save
multiple displays per link.
[How]
We can create an array per link to cache the displays, but it
complicates the design. Instead we can use the module to cache the
displays.
Now we will always add all the displays to the module, but we use the
adjustment flag to disable hdcp on all of them before they are added.
When we want to enable hdcp we just query the display(cache), remove
it then add it back with different adjustments. Its the similar for
disable.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
HDCP 2.2 uses type0 and type1 content type. This is passed to the receiver
to stream the proper content.
For example, in a MST case if the main
device is HDCP2.2 capable but the secondary device is only 1.4 capabale
we can use Type0
Type0 content: use HDCP 1.4 or HDCP2.2 type0
Type1 content: Only use HDCP 2.2 type1
[How]
We use the "hdcp content type" property in drm. We use the
disable_type1 flag in hdcp module to select the type based on the
properties.
For updating the property we use the same logic as 1.4, but now we
consider content_type as well and update the property if the
requirements are met
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
HDCP 2.2 was disabled, we need to enable it
[How]
-Update display topology to support 2.2
-Unset hdcp2.disable in update_config
-Change logic of event_update_property, now we set the property to be
ENABLED for any level of encryption (2.2 or 1.4).
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c:32:6: warning: symbol 'lp_write_i2c' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c:42:6: warning: symbol 'lp_read_i2c' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c:52:6: warning: symbol 'lp_write_dpcd' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c:59:6: warning: symbol 'lp_read_dpcd' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to use HW state to set content protection to ENABLED.
This way we know that the link is encrypted from the HW side
[How]
Create a workqueue that queries the HW every ~2seconds, and sets it to
ENABLED or DESIRED based on the result from the hardware
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to read and write specific i2c and dpcd messages.
[How]
Created static functions for packing the dpcd and i2c messages for hdcp.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to interact with the hdcp module from the DM, the module
has to be interacted with in terms of events
[How]
Create the files needed for linux hdcp. These files manage the events
needed for the dm to interact with the hdcp module.
We use the kernel work queue to process the events needed for
the module
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
