| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The `amdgpu_ucode_release` helper is replacing all calls
to release_firmware.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
amdgpu_bo_kmap() returns error when fails to map buffer object. Add the
error check and propagate the error.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Fix the compile warning below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/legacy-dpm/kv_dpm.c:1641
kv_get_acp_boot_level() warn: always true condition '(table->entries[i]->clk >= 0) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
CC: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.
By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.
Fixes: 3712e7a49459 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
In function si_parse_power_table(), array adev->pm.dpm.ps and its member
is allocated. If the allocation of each member fails, the array itself
is freed and returned with an error code. However, the array is later
freed again in si_dpm_fini() function which is called when the function
returns an error.
This leads to potential double free of the array adev->pm.dpm.ps, as
well as leak of its array members, since the members are not freed in
the allocation function and the array is not nulled when freed.
In addition adev->pm.dpm.num_ps, which keeps track of the allocated
array member, is not updated until the member allocation is
successfully finished, this could also lead to either use after free,
or uninitialized variable access in si_dpm_fini().
Fix this by postponing the free of the array until si_dpm_fini() and
increment adev->pm.dpm.num_ps everytime the array member is allocated.
Signed-off-by: Keita Suzuki <keitasuzuki.park@sslab.ics.keio.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Include the header with the prototype to silence the following clang
warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:29:6: warning: no
previous prototype for function 'amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
void amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:29:1: note: declare
'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this
translation unit
void amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
static
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:76:5: warning: no
previous prototype for function 'amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
u32 amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/amdgpu_dpm_internal.c:76:1: note: declare
'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this
translation unit
u32 amdgpu_dpm_get_vrefresh(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
^
static
2 warnings generated.
Besides that, remove the duplicated prototype of the function
amdgpu_dpm_get_vblank_time in order to keep the consistency of the
headers.
Fixes: 6ddbd37f1074 ("drm/amd/pm: optimize the amdgpu_pm_compute_clocks() implementations")
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Clean the following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c:7035:2-4: WARNING: possible
condition with no effect (if == else).
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
On functionality unsupported, -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned. And we rely
on that to determine the fan attributes support.
Fixes: 79c65f3fcbb128 ("drm/amd/pm: do not expose power implementation details to amdgpu_pm.c")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
As it's impossible the thermal sensor of KV is one of them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
As the only entry point, it's now safe and reasonable to
enforce the lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c. And with
this, we can drop other internal used power locks.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Avoid cross callings which make lock protection enforcement
on amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level() impossible.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Instead of centralizing all headers in the same folder. Separate them into
different folders and place them among those source files those who really
need them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
