| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:112: warning: Function parameter or member 'hwmgr' not described in 'phm_wait_on_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:112: warning: Function parameter or member 'index' not described in 'phm_wait_on_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:112: warning: Function parameter or member 'value' not described in 'phm_wait_on_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:112: warning: Function parameter or member 'mask' not described in 'phm_wait_on_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'hwmgr' not described in 'phm_wait_on_indirect_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'indirect_port' not described in 'phm_wait_on_indirect_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'index' not described in 'phm_wait_on_indirect_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'value' not described in 'phm_wait_on_indirect_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:145: warning: Function parameter or member 'mask' not described in 'phm_wait_on_indirect_register'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu_helper.c:494: warning: Function parameter or member 'hwmgr' not described in 'phm_initializa_dynamic_state_adjustment_rule_settings'
Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Correct Polaris10 setup.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
The target is to provide a clear entry point(for power routines).
Also this can help to maintain a clear view about the frameworks
used on different ASICs. Hopefully all these can make power part
more friendly to play with.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
