| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Need to make sure people can find the panel-bridge to avoid typing too
much.
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190111164048.29067-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
|
|
I have some pulls based on rc6, and I prefer to have an explicit backmerge.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 0c08754b59da5557532d946599854e6df28edc22.
commit 0c08754b59da
("drm/panel: Add device_link from panel device to DRM device")
creates a circular dependency under these circumstances:
1. The panel depends on dsi-host because it is MIPI-DSI child
device.
2. dsi-host depends on the drm parent device (connector->dev->dev)
this should be allowed.
3. drm parent dev (connector->dev->dev) depends on the panel
after this patch.
This makes the dependency circular and while it appears it
does not affect any in-tree drivers (they do not seem to have
dsi hosts depending on the same parent device) this does not
seem right.
As noted in a response from Andrzej Hajda, the intent is
likely to make the panel dependent on the DRM device
(connector->dev) not its parent. But we have no way of
doing that since the DRM device doesn't contain any
struct device on its own (arguably it should).
Revert this until a proper approach is figured out.
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180927124130.9102-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
|
|
Resolves the following warnings.
../drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c:158: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
../drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c:159: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Fixes: c59eb3cfde1f ("drm/panel: Let of_drm_find_panel() return -ENODEV when the panel is disabled")
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180815203833.210143-1-sean@poorly.run
|
|
DT nodes might be present in the DT but with a status property set to
"disabled" or "fail". In this case, we should not return -EPROBE_DEFER
when the caller asks for a drm_panel instance. Return -ENODEV instead.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509130042.9435-3-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com
|
|
Right now, the DRM panel logic returns NULL when a panel pointing to
the passed OF node is not present in the list of registered panels.
Most drivers interpret this NULL value as -EPROBE_DEFER, but we are
about to modify the semantic of of_drm_find_panel() and let the
framework return -ENODEV when the device node we're pointing to has
a status property that is not equal to "okay" or "ok".
Let's first patch the of_drm_find_panel() implementation to return
ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER) instead of NULL and patch all callers to replace
the '!panel' check by an 'IS_ERR(panel)' one.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509130042.9435-2-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com
|
|
Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to DRM device (consumer)
when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the master
DRM driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in use. The
device_link should make sure the DRM device is unbound before the panel
driver becomes unavailable.
The device_link is removed when drm_panel_detach() is called. The
drm_panel_detach() should be called by the consumer DRM driver, not the
panel driver, otherwise both drivers are racing to delete the same link.
Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b53584fd988d045c13de22d81825395b0ae0aad7.1524727888.git.jsarha@ti.com
|
|
Remove all drm_panel_detach() calls from all panel drivers and update
the kerneldoc for drm_panel_detach().
Setting the connector and drm to NULL when the DRM panel device is going
away hardly serves any purpose. Usually the whole memory structure is
freed right after the remove call. However, calling the detach function
from the master DRM device, and setting the connector pointer to NULL,
has the logic of marking the panel again as available for another DRM
master to attach. The usual situation would be the same DRM master
device binding again.
Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/464b8d330d6b4c94cfb5aad2ca9ea7eb2c52d934.1524727888.git.jsarha@ti.com
|
|
The argument is never modified by the function, make it const.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Write more complete kerneldoc comments for the DRM panel API and
integrate the helpers in the DRM DocBook reference.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>drm/panel: Add helper for simple panel connector
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160506140137.GA4641@ulmo.ba.sec
|
|
Add a very simple framework to register and lookup panels. Panel drivers
can initialize a DRM panel and register it with the framework, allowing
them to be retrieved and used by display drivers. Currently only support
for DPMS and obtaining panel modes is provided. However it should be
sufficient to enable a large number of panels. The framework should also
be easily extensible to support more sophisticated kinds of panels such
as DSI.
The framework hasn't been tied into the DRM core, even though it should
be easily possible to do so if that's what we want. In the current
implementation, display drivers can simple make use of it to retrieve a
panel, obtain its modes and control its DPMS mode.
Note that this is currently only tested on systems that boot from a
device tree. No glue code has been written yet for systems that use
platform data, but it should be easy to add.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
