| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The current dsb API is not really prepared to handle multithread access.
I was debugging an issue that ended up fixed by commit a096883dda2c
("drm/i915/dsb: Remove PIN_MAPPABLE from the DSB object VMA") and was
puzzled how these atomic operations were guaranteeing atomicity.
if (atomic_add_return(1, &dsb->refcount) != 1)
return dsb;
Thread A could still be initializing dsb struct (and even fail in the
middle) while thread B would take a reference and use it (even
derefencing a NULL cmd_buf).
I don't think the atomic operations here will help much if this were
to support multithreaded scenario in future, so just remove them to
avoid confusion.
v2: Use refcount++ != 0 instead of ++refcount != 1 (from Ville)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191111205024.22853-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191116011539.18230-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Batch buffer will be created through dsb-reg-write function which can have
single/multiple request based on usecase and once the buffer is ready
commit function will trigger the execution of the batch buffer. All
the registers will be updated simultaneously.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Optimized code few places. (Chris)
v3: USed DRM_ERROR for dsb head/tail programming failure. (Shashank)
v4: reset ins_start_offset after commit. (Jani)
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190920115930.27829-8-animesh.manna@intel.com
|
|
DSB can program large set of data through indexed register write
(opcode 0x9) in one shot. DSB feature can be used for bulk register
programming e.g. gamma lut programming, HDR meta data programming.
v1: initial version.
v2: simplified code by using ALIGN(). (Chris)
v3: ascii table added as code comment. (Shashank)
v4: cosmetic changes done. (Shashank)
v5: reset ins_start_offset. (Jani)
v6: update ins_start_offset in inel_dsb_reg_write.
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190920115930.27829-5-animesh.manna@intel.com
|
|
DSB support single register write through opcode 0x1. Generic
api created which accumulate all single register write in a batch
buffer and once DSB is triggered, it will program all the registers
at the same time.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Unused macro removed and cosmetic changes done. (Shashank)
v3: set free_pos to zero in dsb-put() instead dsb-get() and
a cosmetic change. (Shashank)
v4: macro of indexed-write is moved. (Shashank)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190920115930.27829-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
|
|
This patch adds a function, which will internally get the gem buffer
for DSB engine. The GEM buffer is from global GTT, and is mapped into
CPU domain, contains the data + opcode to be feed to DSB engine.
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- removed some unwanted code. (Chris)
- Used i915_gem_object_create_internal instead of _shmem. (Chris)
- cmd_buf_tail removed and can be derived through vma object. (Chris)
v3: vma realeased if i915_gem_object_pin_map() failed. (Shashank)
v4: for simplification and based on current usage added single dsb
object in intel_crtc. (Shashank)
v5: seting NULL to cmd_buf moved outside of mutex in dsb-put(). (Shashank)
v6:
- refcount machanism added.
- Used atomic_add_return and atomic_dec_and_test instead of
atomic_inc and atomic_dec. (Jani)
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
[Jani: added #include <linux/types.h> while pushing]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190920115930.27829-3-animesh.manna@intel.com
|
