| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We need the rename of reservation_object to dma_resv.
The solution on this merge came from linux-next:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix up fallout from "dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
index 03d90b49584a..4cd54c569911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ static int pool_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
struct intel_engine_pool_node *node =
container_of(ref, typeof(*node), active);
- struct reservation_object *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
+ struct dma_resv *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
int err;
- if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
+ dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_unlock(resv);
}
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(node->obj);
which is a simplified version from a previous one which had:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Since commit 078dec3326e2 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_get_stub") the 0
fence context became an impossible match as it is used for an always
signaled fence. We can simplify our timeline tracking by knowing that 0
always means no match.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819184404.24200-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819175109.5241-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Be more consistent with the naming of the other DMA-buf objects.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/323401/
|
|
Since commit 1ba627148ef5 ("drm: Add reservation_object to
drm_gem_object"), struct drm_gem_object grew its own builtin
reservation_object rendering our own private one bloat. Remove our
redundant reservation_object and point into obj->base.resv instead.
References: 1ba627148ef5 ("drm: Add reservation_object to drm_gem_object")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618125858.7295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Use the per-object local lock to control the cache domain of the
individual GEM objects, not struct_mutex. This is a huge leap forward
for us in terms of object-level synchronisation; execbuffers are
coordinated using the ww_mutex and pread/pwrite is finally fully
serialised again.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
