summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_lmem.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-09-20drm/i915/guc: put all guc objects in lmem when availableDaniele Ceraolo Spurio
The firmware binary has to be loaded from lmem and the recommendation is to put all other objects in there as well. Note that we don't fall back to system memory if the allocation in lmem fails because all objects are allocated during driver load and if we have issues with lmem at that point something is seriously wrong with the system, so no point in trying to handle it. Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916162819.27848-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-06-30drm/i915: support forcing the page size with lmemMatthew Auld
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging structures. This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM, LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour into the manager should fix this. v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner v3: rebase on ttm sys changes Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutableThomas Hellström
The object ops i915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM and the object I915_BO_ALLOC_STRUCT_PAGE flags are considered immutable by much of our code. Introduce a new mem_flags member to hold these and make sure checks for these flags being set are either done under the object lock or with pages properly pinned. The flags will change during migration under the object lock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210624084240.270219-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2021-06-11drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backendThomas Hellström
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation. Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM (which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches. We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region, as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM. Remove the old lmem backend. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2021-04-27drm/i915/lmem: Bypass aperture when lmem is availableAnusha Srivatsa
In the scenario where local memory is available, we have rely on CPU access via lmem directly instead of aperture. v2: gmch is only relevant for much older hw, therefore we can drop the has_aperture check since it should always be present on such platforms. (Chris) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris P Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210427085417.120246-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
2021-01-15drm/i915/region: convert object_create into object_initMatthew Auld
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step, like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions to the object. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
2020-01-03drm/i915/gem: Support discontiguous lmem object mapsChris Wilson
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support i915_gem_object_pin_map(). v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102204215.1519103-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-25drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mappingAbdiel Janulgue
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them into kernel space for internal use. Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-25drm/i915: support creating LMEM objectsMatthew Auld
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk