| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression i915; @@
- INTEL_GEN(i915)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915)
@@ expression i915; expression E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(i915) >= E
+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= E
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- !IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) != E
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == E
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
@def@
expression E;
identifier id =~ "^gen$";
@@
- id = GRAPHICS_VER(E)
+ ver = GRAPHICS_VER(E)
@@
identifier def.id;
@@
- id
+ ver
It also takes care of renaming the variable we assign to GRAPHICS_VER()
so to use "ver" rather than "gen".
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210605155356.4183026-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Instead of sharing pages with breadcrumbs, give each timeline a
single page. This allows unrelated timelines not to share locks
any more during command submission.
As an additional benefit, seqno wraparound no longer requires
i915_vma_pin, which means we no longer need to worry about a
potential -EDEADLK at a point where we are ready to submit.
Changes since v1:
- Fix erroneous i915_vma_acquire that should be a i915_vma_release (ickle).
- Extra check for completion in intel_read_hwsp().
Changes since v2:
- Fix inconsistent indent in hwsp_alloc() (kbuild)
- memset entire cacheline to 0.
Changes since v3:
- Do same in intel_timeline_reset_seqno(), and clflush for good measure.
Changes since v4:
- Use refcounting on timeline, instead of relying on i915_active.
- Fix waiting on kernel requests.
Changes since v5:
- Bump amount of slots to maximum (256), for best wraparounds.
- Add hwsp_offset to i915_request to fix potential wraparound hang.
- Ensure timeline wrap test works with the changes.
- Assign hwsp in intel_timeline_read_hwsp() within the rcu lock to
fix a hang.
Changes since v6:
- Rename i915_request_active_offset to i915_request_active_seqno(),
and elaborate the function. (tvrtko)
Changes since v7:
- Move hunk to where it belongs. (jekstrand)
- Replace CACHELINE_BYTES with TIMELINE_SEQNO_BYTES. (jekstrand)
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com> #v1
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
|
gen3 does not fully flush MI stores to memory on MI_FLUSH, such that a
subsequent read from e.g. the sampler can bypass the store and read the
stale value from memory. This is a serious issue when we are using MI
stores to rewrite the batches for relocation, as it means that the batch
is reading from random user/kernel memory. While it is particularly
sensitive [and detectable] for relocations, reading stale data at any
time is a worry.
Having started with a small number of delaying stores and doubling until
no more incoherency was seen over a few hours (with and without
background memory pressure), 32 was the magic number.
Note that it definitely doesn't fix the issue, merely adds a long delay
between requests, sufficient to mostly hide the problem, enough to raise
the mtbf to several hours. This is merely a stop gap.
v2: Follow more closer with the gen5 w/a and include some
post-invalidate flushes as well.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2018
References: a889580c087a ("drm/i915: Flush GPU relocs harder for gen3")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200612123949.7093-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request,
so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes
from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer
chasing in using rq->engine->i915?
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Pull the routines for writing CS packets out of intel_ring_submission
into their own files. These are low level operations for building CS
instructions, rather than the logic for filling the global ring buffer
with requests, and we will want to reuse them outside of this context.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601072446.19548-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
