| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Clean up the SPDX licence declarations to comply with checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122192913.4518-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Make a copy of the object tiling parameters at the point of grabbing the
fence.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200401210104.15907-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Only GPU activity via the GGTT fence is asynchronous, we know that we
control the CPU access directly, so we only need to wait for the GPU to
stop using the fence before we relinquish it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200401210104.15907-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Since the number of fence regs can vary dramactically between platforms,
allocate the array on demand so we don't waste as much space.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200316113846.4974-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Since the fence registers control HW detiling through the GGTT
aperture, make them a part of the intel_ggtt under gt/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200316113846.4974-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
