summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-09-30drm/i915: Use direction definition DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL instead of ↵Cai Huoqing
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL Replace direction definition PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, because it helps to enhance readability and avoid possible inconsistency. Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210925124613.144-1-caihuoqing@baidu.com
2021-08-05drm/i915/xehp: handle new steering optionsDaniele Ceraolo Spurio
Xe_HP is more modular than its predecessors and as a consequence it has more types of replicated registers. As with l3bank regions on previous platforms, we may need to explicitly re-steer accesses to these new types of ranges at runtime if we can't find a single default steering value that satisfies the fusing of all types. v2: - Add a local 'i915' variable to reduce gt->i915 usage. (Caz) - Drop unused 'intel_gt_read_register' prototype. (Caz) v3: - Drop unnecessary comment text. (Lucas) - Drop unused register bit definition. (Lucas) Bspec: 66534 Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-21drm/i915: Make GT workaround upper bounds exclusiveMatt Roper
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound (i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very easy for mistakes to creep in. Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code. We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make this change too. [mattrope: Split out GT changes to apply through gt-next tree] Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-14Merge branch 'topic/revid_steppings' into drm-intel-gt-nextMatt Roper
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the new macros is clean. Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2021-07-14drm/i915/dg1: Use revid->stepping tablesMatt Roper
Switch DG1 to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all platforms going forward. This removes the last use of IS_REVID() and REVID_FOREVER, so remove those now-unused macros as well to prevent their accidental use on future platforms. v2: - Use COMMON_STEP() macro in table. (Anusha) Bspec: 44463 Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-11-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-06-17drm/i915: Remove duplicate include of intel_region_lmem.hWan Jiabing
Fix the following checkinclude.pl warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c 8 #include "intel_region_lmem.h" 12 #include "intel_region_lmem.h" Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210615113522.6867-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com
2021-06-11drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backendThomas Hellström
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation. Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM (which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches. We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region, as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM. Remove the old lmem backend. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2021-06-02drm/i915/ttm Initialize the ttm device and memory managersThomas Hellström
Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions. Also modify the mock region selftests somewhat to account for a fragmenting manager. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602083818.241793-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
2021-04-29drm/i915/gt: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdevThomas Zimmermann
References to struct drm_device.pdev should not be used any longer as the field will be moved into the struct's legacy section. Add a fix for the rsp commit. v8: * fix commit message (Michael) Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Fixes: a50ca39fbd01 ("drm/i915: setup the LMEM region") Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429105101.25667-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
2021-03-24drm/i915: Distinction of memory regionsZbigniew Kempczyński
In preparation for Xe HP multi-tile architecture with multiple memory regions, we need to be able differentiate multiple instances of device local-memory. Note that the region name is just to give it a human friendly identifier, instead of using class/instance which also uniquely identifies the region. So far the region name is only for our own internal debugging in the kernel(like in the selftests), or debugfs which prints the list of regions, including the regions name. v2: add commentary for our current region name use Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210203171231.551338-1-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915/dg1: Reserve first 1MB of local memoryImre Deak
On DG1 A0/B0 steppings the first 1MB of local memory must be reserved. One reason for this is that the 0xA0000-0xB0000 range is not accessible by the display, probably since this region is redirected to another memory location for legacy VGA compatibility. BSpec: 50586 Testcase: igt/kms_big_fb/linear-64bpp-rotate-0 v2: - Reserve the memory on B0 as well. v3: replace DRM_DEBUG/DRM_ERROR with drm_dbg/drm_err v4: fix the insanity Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-5-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: reserve stolen for LMEM regionCQ Tang
The lmem region needs to remove the stolen part, which should just be a case of snipping it off the end. Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-3-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: setup the LMEM regionMatthew Auld
Hook up the LMEM region. Addresses will start from zero, and for CPU access we get LMEM_BAR which is just a 1:1 mapping of said region. Based on a patch from Michel Thierry. v2 by Jani: - use intel_uncore_read/intel_uncore_write - remove trailing blank line v3: s/drm_info/drm_dbg for info which in non-pertinent for the user Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-2-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: make local-memory probing a GT operationMatthew Auld
Device local memory is very much a GT thing, therefore it should be the responsibility of the GT to setup the device local memory region. Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-1-matthew.auld@intel.com [danvet: Rebase conflict.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915/gt: Replace unnecessary ',' with '; 'Chris Wilson
Checkpatch spotted a couple of commas where we can use the more common ';', and so not worry about the subtle implications of sequence points. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122192913.4518-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-11Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-nextJani Nikula
Sync up with upstream. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2021-02-02drm/i915: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdevThomas Zimmermann
Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert i915 to struct drm_device.dev. No functional changes. v6: * also remove assignment in selftests/ in a later patch (Chris) v5: * remove assignment in later patch (Chris) v3: * rebased v2: * move gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210128133127.2311-2-tzimmermann@suse.de
2021-01-15drm/i915/region: convert object_create into object_initMatthew Auld
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step, like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions to the object. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
2021-01-12drm/i915: move region_lmem under gtMatthew Auld
Device local-memory should be thought of as part the GT, which means it should also sit under gt/. Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210112164300.356524-1-matthew.auld@intel.com