summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-08-15drm/i915: Track pinned VMAChris Wilson
Treat the VMA as the primary struct responsible for tracking bindings into the GPU's VM. That is we want to treat the VMA returned after we pin an object into the VM as the cookie we hold and eventually release when unpinning. Doing so eliminates the ambiguity in pinning the object and then searching for the relevant pin later. v2: Joonas' stylistic nitpicks, a fun rebase. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1471254551-25805-27-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-10drm/i915: Move setting of request->batch into its single callsiteChris Wilson
request->batch_obj is only set by execbuffer for the convenience of debugging hangs. By moving that operation to the callsite, we can simplify all other callers and future patches. We also move the complications of reference handling of the request->batch_obj next to where the active tracking is set up for the request. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470832906-13972-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-09drm/i915: Do not overwrite the request with zero on reallocationChris Wilson
When using RCU lookup for the request, commit 0eafec6d3244 ("drm/i915: Enable lockless lookup of request tracking via RCU"), we acknowledge that we may race with another thread that could have reallocated the request. In order for the first thread not to blow up, the second thread must not clear the request completed before overwriting it. In the RCU lookup, we allow for the engine/seqno to be replaced but we do not allow for it to be zeroed. The choice we make is to either add extra checking to the RCU lookup, or embrace the inherent races (as intended). It is more complicated as we need to manually clear everything we depend upon being zero initialised, but we benefit from not emiting the memset() to clear the entire frequently allocated structure (that memset turns up in throughput profiles). And at the same time, the lookup remains flexible for future adjustments. v2: Old style LRC requires another variable to be initialize. (The danger inherent in not zeroing everything.) v3: request->batch also needs to be cleared v4: signaling.tsk is no long used unset, but pid still exists Fixes: 0eafec6d3244 ("drm/i915: Enable lockless lookup of request...") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470731014-6894-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-09drm/i915: Add smp_rmb() to busy ioctl's RCU danceChris Wilson
In the debate as to whether the second read of active->request is ordered after the dependent reads of the first read of active->request, just give in and throw a smp_rmb() in there so that ordering of loads is assured. v2: Explain the manual smp_rmb() Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470731014-6894-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-09drm/i915: Wrap the protected active RCU dereference in a helperChris Wilson
As we do the lockdep protected RCU lookup in a couple of places, refactor that code to a common helper i915_gem_active_raw(). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470728222-10243-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-09drm/i915: Remove unused i915_gem_active_peek_rcu()Chris Wilson
This was originally introduced to be used by the busy-ioctl, but in the end busy ioctl performed a different dance. Since there are no users, and no likely users, remove an unwanted chunk of the API. Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470728222-10243-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2016-08-05drm/i915: Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle() without holding struct_mutexChris Wilson
The principal motivation for this was to try and eliminate the struct_mutex from i915_gem_suspend - but we still need to hold the mutex current for the i915_gem_context_lost(). (The issue there is that there may be an indirect lockdep cycle between cpu_hotplug (i.e. suspend) and struct_mutex via the stop_machine().) For the moment, enabling last request tracking for the engine, allows us to do busyness checking and waiting without requiring the struct_mutex - which is useful in its own right. As a side-effect of having a robust means for tracking engine busyness, we can replace our other busyness heuristic, that of comparing against the last submitted seqno. For paranoid reasons, we have a semi-ordered check of that seqno inside the hangchecker, which we can now improve to an ordered check of the engine's busyness (removing a locked xchg in the process). v2: Pass along "bool interruptible" as being unlocked we cannot rely on i915->mm.interruptible being stable or even under our control. v3: Replace check Ironlake i915_gpu_busy() with the common precalculated value Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-05drm/i915: Introduce i915_gem_active_wait_unlocked()Chris Wilson
It is useful to be able to wait on pending rendering without grabbing the struct_mutex. We can do this by using the i915_gem_active_get_rcu() primitive to acquire a reference to the pending request without requiring struct_mutex, just the RCU read lock, and then call i915_wait_request(). v2: Rebase onto new i915_gem_active_get_unlocked() semantics that take the RCU read lock on behalf of the caller. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Enable lockless lookup of request tracking via RCUChris Wilson
If we enable RCU for the requests (providing a grace period where we can inspect a "dead" request before it is freed), we can allow callers to carefully perform lockless lookup of an active request. However, by enabling deferred freeing of requests, we can potentially hog a lot of memory when dealing with tens of thousands of requests per second - with a quick insertion of a synchronize_rcu() inside our shrinker callback, that issue disappears. v2: Currently, it is our responsibility to handle reclaim i.e. to avoid hogging memory with the delayed slab frees. At the moment, we wait for a grace period in the shrinker, and block for all RCU callbacks on oom. Suggested alternatives focus on flushing our RCU callback when we have a certain number of outstanding request frees, and blocking on that flush after a second high watermark. (So rather than wait for the system to run out of memory, we stop issuing requests - both are nondeterministic.) Paul E. McKenney wrote: Another approach is synchronize_rcu() after some largish number of requests. The advantage of this approach is that it throttles the production of callbacks at the source. The corresponding disadvantage is that it slows things up. Another approach is to use call_rcu(), but if the previous call_rcu() is still in flight, block waiting for it. Yet another approach is the get_state_synchronize_rcu() / cond_synchronize_rcu() pair. The idea is to do something like this: cond_synchronize_rcu(cookie); cookie = get_state_synchronize_rcu(); You would of course do an initial get_state_synchronize_rcu() to get things going. This would not block unless there was less than one grace period's worth of time between invocations. But this assumes a busy system, where there is almost always a grace period in flight. But you can make that happen as follows: cond_synchronize_rcu(cookie); cookie = get_state_synchronize_rcu(); call_rcu(&my_rcu_head, noop_function); Note that you need additional code to make sure that the old callback has completed before doing a new one. Setting and clearing a flag with appropriate memory ordering control suffices (e.g,. smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release()). v3: More comments on compiler and processor order of operations within the RCU lookup and discover we can use rcu_access_pointer() here instead. v4: Wrap i915_gem_active_get_rcu() to take the rcu_read_lock itself. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-25-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: s/__i915_wait_request/i915_wait_request/Chris Wilson
There is only one wait on request function now, so drop the "expert" indication of leading __. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Move the special case wait-request handling to its one callerChris Wilson
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Track requests inside each intel_ringChris Wilson
By tracking each request occupying space inside an individual intel_ring, we can greatly simplify the logic of tracking available space and not worry about other timelines. (Each ring is an ordered timeline of committed requests.) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-17-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requestsChris Wilson
With the introduction of requests, we amplified the number of atomic refcounted objects we use and update every execbuffer; from none to several references, and a set of references that need to be changed. We also introduced interesting side-effects in the order of retiring requests and objects. Instead of independently tracking the last request for an object, track the active objects for each request. The object will reside in the buffer list of its most recent active request and so we reduce the kref interchange to a list_move. Now retirements are entirely driven by the request, dramatically simplifying activity tracking on the object themselves, and removing the ambiguity between retiring objects and retiring requests. Furthermore with the consolidation of managing the activity tracking centrally, we can look forward to using RCU to enable lockless lookup of the current active requests for an object. In the future, we will be able to query the status or wait upon rendering to an object without even touching the struct_mutex BKL. All told, less code, simpler and faster, and more extensible. v2: Add a typedef for the function pointer for convenience later. v3: Make the noop retirement callback explicit. Allow passing NULL to the init_request_active() which is expanded to a common noop function. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Rename request->list to link for consistencyChris Wilson
We use "list" to denote the list and "link" to denote an element on that list. Rename request->list to match this idiom. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Mark up i915_gem_active for locking annotationChris Wilson
The future annotations will track the locking used for access to ensure that it is always sufficient. We make the preparations now to present the API ahead and to make sure that GCC can eliminate the unused parameter. Before: 6298417 3619610 696320 10614347 a1f64b vmlinux After: 6298417 3619610 696320 10614347 a1f64b vmlinux (with i915 builtin) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Prepare i915_gem_active for annotationsChris Wilson
In the future, we will want to add annotations to the i915_gem_active struct. The API is thus expanded to hide direct access to the contents of i915_gem_active and mediated instead through a number of helpers. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-04drm/i915: Introduce i915_gem_active for request trackingChris Wilson
In the next patch, request tracking is made more generic and for that we need a new expanded struct and to separate out the logic changes from the mechanical churn, we split out the structure renaming into this patch. v2: Writer's block. Add some spiel about why we track requests. v3: Now i915_gem_active. v4: Now with i915_gem_active_set() for attaching to the active request. v5: Use i915_gem_active_set() from inside the retirement handlers Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-02drm/i915: Rename struct intel_ringbuffer to struct intel_ringChris Wilson
The state stored in this struct is not only the information about the buffer object, but the ring used to communicate with the hardware. Using buffer here is overly specific and, for me at least, conflates with the notion of buffer objects themselves. s/struct intel_ringbuffer/struct intel_ring/ s/enum intel_ring_hangcheck/enum intel_engine_hangcheck/ s/describe_ctx_ringbuf()/describe_ctx_ring()/ s/intel_ring_get_active_head()/intel_engine_get_active_head()/ s/intel_ring_sync_index()/intel_engine_sync_index()/ s/intel_ring_init_seqno()/intel_engine_init_seqno()/ s/ring_stuck()/engine_stuck()/ s/intel_cleanup_engine()/intel_engine_cleanup()/ s/intel_stop_engine()/intel_engine_stop()/ s/intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj()/intel_pin_and_map_ring()/ s/intel_unpin_ringbuffer()/intel_unpin_ring()/ s/intel_engine_create_ringbuffer()/intel_engine_create_ring()/ s/intel_ring_flush_all_caches()/intel_engine_flush_all_caches()/ s/intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches()/intel_engine_invalidate_all_caches()/ s/intel_ringbuffer_free()/intel_ring_free()/ Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-08-02drm/i915: Rename request->ringbuf to request->ringChris Wilson
Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the request. @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request *r; @@ - r->ringbuf + r->ring Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-07-20drm/i915: Rename request reference/unreference to get/putChris Wilson
Now that we derive requests from struct fence, swap over to its nomenclature for references. It's shorter and more idiomatic across the kernel. s/i915_gem_request_reference/i915_gem_request_get/ s/i915_gem_request_unreference/i915_gem_request_put/ Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469005202-9659-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469017917-15134-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-07-20drm/i915: Disable waitboosting for fence_wait()Chris Wilson
We want to restrict waitboosting to known process contexts, where we can track which clients are receiving waitboosts and prevent excessive power wasting. For fence_wait() we do not have any client tracking and so that leaves it open to abuse. v2: Hide the IS_ERR_OR_NULL testing for special clients Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469002875-2335-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-07-20drm/i915: Derive GEM requests from dma-fenceChris Wilson
dma-buf provides a generic fence class for interoperation between drivers. Internally we use the request structure as a fence, and so with only a little bit of interfacing we can rebase those requests on top of dma-buf fences. This will allow us, in the future, to pass those fences back to userspace or between drivers. v2: The fence_context needs to be globally unique, not just unique to this device. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469002875-2335-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-07-20drm/i915: Move GEM request routines to i915_gem_request.cChris Wilson
Migrate the request operations out of the main body of i915_gem.c and into their own C file for easier expansion. v2: Move __i915_add_request() across as well Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469002875-2335-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk