summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_random.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-10-02drm/i915/selftests: Extract random_offset() for use with a prngChris Wilson
For selftests, we desire repeatability and so prefer using a prng with known seed over true randomness. Extract random_offset() as a selftest utility that can take the prng state. Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191002122430.23205-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-28drm/i915: Share per-timeline HWSP using a slab suballocatorChris Wilson
If we restrict ourselves to only using a cacheline for each timeline's HWSP (we could go smaller, but want to avoid needless polluting cachelines on different engines between different contexts), then we can suballocate a single 4k page into 64 different timeline HWSP. By treating each fresh allocation as a slab of 64 entries, we can keep it around for the next 64 allocation attempts until we need to refresh the slab cache. John Harrison noted the issue of fragmentation leading to the same worst case performance of one page per timeline as before, which can be mitigated by adopting a freelist. v2: Keep all partially allocated HWSP on a freelist This is still without migration, so it is possible for the system to end up with each timeline in its own page, but we ensure that no new allocation would needless allocate a fresh page! v3: Throw a selftest at the allocator to try and catch invalid cacheline reuse. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128181812.22804-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-01-02drm/i915/selftests: Allow random array allocation to failChris Wilson
In the selftests, we don't want to force an oom and would rather ENOMEM be reported. In this case, we would rather the allocation for the random array to fail. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171223110407.21402-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-11-22drm/i915/selftests: Use NOWARN for large allocationsChris Wilson
We may try to do a large kmalloc for the permutation array, falling back to a smaller array/test if the first allocation fails. Since we are intentionally trying a large allocation which may fail, pass __GFP_NOWARN. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103842 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171122120600.27025-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
2017-09-28Merge drm-upstream/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queuedJani Nikula
Need MST sideband message transaction to power up/down nodes. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2017-09-13mm: treewide: remove GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flagMichal Hocko
GFP_TEMPORARY was introduced by commit e12ba74d8ff3 ("Group short-lived and reclaimable kernel allocations") along with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. It's primary motivation was to allow users to tell that an allocation is short lived and so the allocator can try to place such allocations close together and prevent long term fragmentation. As much as this sounds like a reasonable semantic it becomes much less clear when to use the highlevel GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag. How long is temporary? Can the context holding that memory sleep? Can it take locks? It seems there is no good answer for those questions. The current implementation of GFP_TEMPORARY is basically GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RECLAIMABLE which in itself is tricky because basically none of the existing caller provide a way to reclaim the allocated memory. So this is rather misleading and hard to evaluate for any benefits. I have checked some random users and none of them has added the flag with a specific justification. I suspect most of them just copied from other existing users and others just thought it might be a good idea to use without any measuring. This suggests that GFP_TEMPORARY just motivates for cargo cult usage without any reasoning. I believe that our gfp flags are quite complex already and especially those with highlevel semantic should be clearly defined to prevent from confusion and abuse. Therefore I propose dropping GFP_TEMPORARY and replace all existing users to simply use GFP_KERNEL. Please note that SLAB users with shrinkers will still get __GFP_RECLAIMABLE heuristic and so they will be placed properly for memory fragmentation prevention. I can see reasons we might want some gfp flag to reflect shorterm allocations but I propose starting from a clear semantic definition and only then add users with proper justification. This was been brought up before LSF this year by Matthew [1] and it turned out that GFP_TEMPORARY really doesn't have a clear semantic. It seems to be a heuristic without any measured advantage for most (if not all) its current users. The follow up discussion has revealed that opinions on what might be temporary allocation differ a lot between developers. So rather than trying to tweak existing users into a semantic which they haven't expected I propose to simply remove the flag and start from scratch if we really need a semantic for short term allocations. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118054945.GD18349@bombadil.infradead.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: drm/i915: fix up] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816144703.378d4f4d@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170728091904.14627-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-09-13drm/i915/selftests: Use mul_u32_u32() for 32b x 32b -> 64b resultChris Wilson
As realised by commit 9e3d6223d209 ("math64, timers: Fix 32bit mul_u64_u32_shr() and friends"), GCC does not always generate ideal code for performing a 32b x 32b multiply returning a 64b result (i.e. where we idiomatically use u64 result = (u64)x * (u32)x). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170913105154.2910-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
2017-05-03drm/i915: Squash repeated awaits on the same fenceChris Wilson
Track the latest fence waited upon on each context, and only add a new asynchronous wait if the new fence is more recent than the recorded fence for that context. This requires us to filter out unordered timelines, which are noted by DMA_FENCE_NO_CONTEXT. However, in the absence of a universal identifier, we have to use our own i915->mm.unordered_timeline token. v2: Throw around the debug crutches v3: Inline the likely case of the pre-allocation cache being full. v4: Drop the pre-allocation support, we can lose the most recent fence in case of allocation failure -- it just means we may emit more awaits than strictly necessary but will not break. v5: Trim allocation size for leaf nodes, they only need an array of u32 not pointers. v6: Create mock_timeline to tidy selftest writing v7: s/intel_timeline_sync_get/intel_timeline_sync_is_later/ (Tvrtko) v8: Prune the stale sync points when we idle. v9: Include a small benchmark in the kselftests v10: Separate the idr implementation into its own compartment. (Tvrkto) v11: Refactor igt_sync kselftests to avoid deep nesting (Tvrkto) v12: __sync_leaf_idx() to assert that p->height is 0 when checking leaves v13: kselftests to investigate struct i915_syncmap itself (Tvrtko) v14: Foray into ascii art graphs v15: Take into account that the random lookup/insert does 2 prng calls, not 1, when benchmarking, and use for_each_set_bit() (Tvrtko) v16: Improved ascii art Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170503093924.5320-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-02-13drm/i915: Provide a hook for selftestsChris Wilson
Some pieces of code are independent of hardware but are very tricky to exercise through the normal userspace ABI or via debugfs hooks. Being able to create mock unit tests and execute them through CI is vital. Start by adding a central point where we can execute unit tests and a parameter to enable them. This is disabled by default as the expectation is that these tests will occasionally explode. To facilitate integration with igt, any parameter beginning with i915.igt__ is interpreted as a subtest executable independently via igt/drv_selftest. Two classes of selftests are recognised: mock unit tests and integration tests. Mock unit tests are run as soon as the module is loaded, before the device is probed. At that point there is no driver instantiated and all hw interactions must be "mocked". This is very useful for writing universal tests to exercise code not typically run on a broad range of architectures. Alternatively, you can hook into the live selftests and run when the device has been instantiated - hw interactions are real. v2: Add a macro for compiling conditional code for mock objects inside real objects. v3: Differentiate between mock unit tests and late integration test. v4: List the tests in natural order, use igt to sort after modparam. v5: s/late/live/ v6: s/unsigned long/unsigned int/ v7: Use igt_ prefixes for long helpers. v8: Deobfuscate macros overriding functions, stop using -I$(src) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170213171558.20942-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk