| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It isn't necessary for command streams generated by the kernel (at least
not while we aren't storing ring or indirect buffers in VRAM).
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Move the decision what to use into the common VM code.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
That didn't worked correctly any more and opened up a security problem.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
v2: fix rebase onto drm-fixes
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Replace occurrences of "v & 0xffffffff" with lower_32_bits(v)
when it's next to an upper_32_bits(v). Also remove unnecessary
"upper_32_bits(v) & 0xffffffff" code snippets.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Merge drm-fixes into drm-next.
Both i915 and radeon need this done for later patches.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
|
|
Fill VM page tables from the GART page table if applicable.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
It would appear this bug has been copy/pasted many times without being noticed.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
The reason for the false positives was fixed quite some time ago and since
most engines can still execute NOPs while being locked up it leads to false
negatives.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
In all cases where it really matters we are using the read functions anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
To workaround bugs and/or certain limits it's sometimes
useful to fall back to waiting on fences.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
The DMA ring seems to be stable now.
v2: remove pt_ring_index as well
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Similar to separating the UVD code, just put the DMA
functions into separate files.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
