| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Convert all the callers to deal with xe_mmio_*() using struct xe_reg
instead of plain u32. In a few places there was also a rename
s/reg/reg_val/ when dealing with the value returned so it doesn't get
mixed up with the register address.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230508225322.2692066-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
These should replace the _MMIO() and MCR_REG() from i915, with the goal
of being more extensible, allowing to pass the additional fields for
struct xe_reg and struct xe_reg_mcr. Replace all uses of _MMIO() and
MCR_REG() in xe.
Since the RTP, reg-save-restore and WA infra are not ready to use the
new type, just undef the macro like was done for the i915 types
previously. That conversion will come later.
v2: Remove MEDIA_SOFT_SCRATCH_COUNT/MEDIA_SOFT_SCRATCH re-added by
mistake (Matt Roper)
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Clarify a few things related to the PAT programming, particularly on
MTL:
- The register type doesn't change depending on the GT - what
happens is that media GT writes to other set of registers that
are not MCR
- Remove "UNICAST": otherwise it's confusing why it's not using
MCR registers with the unicast function variant
Also, there isn't much reason to keep those parts as macros: promote
them to proper functions and let the compiler inline if it sees fit.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
The tables are only used within this file; there's no reason for them
not to be static.
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327175824.2967914-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Starting with MTL, the number of entries in the PAT table increased to
16. The register offset jumped between index 7 and index 8, so a slight
adjustment is needed to ensure the PAT_INDEX macros select the proper
offset for the upper half of the table.
Note that although there are 16 registers in the hardware, the driver is
currently only asked to program the first 5, and we leave the rest at
their hardware default values. That means we don't actually touch the
upper half of the PAT table in the driver today and this patch won't
have any functional effect [yet].
Bspec: 44235
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-7-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Re-sync our MTL PAT table with the bspec. 1-way coherency should only
be set on table entry 3. We do not want an incorrect setting here to
accidentally paper over other bugs elsewhere in the driver.
Bspec: 45101
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Replace the deprecated "GEN" terminology in the PAT definitions.
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
The PAT_INDEX registers are MCR registers on some platforms and unicast
on others. On MTL the handling even varies between GTs: the primary GT
uses MCR registers while the media GT uses unicast registers. Let's add
proper MCR programming on the relevant platforms/GTs.
Given that we PAT tables to change pretty regularly on future platforms,
we'll make PAT programming an exception to the usual model of assuming
new platforms should inherit the previous platform's behavior. Instead
we'll raise a warning if the current platform isn't handled in the
if/else ladder. This should help prevent subtle cache misbehavior if we
forget to add the table for a new platform.
Bspec: 66534, 67609, 67788
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Provide per-platform tables of PAT values rather than per-platform
functions. This will simplify the handling of unicast vs MCR registers
in the upcoming patches.
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
PAT handling is growing in complexity and will continue to do so in
upcoming platforms. Separate it out to a dedicated file to keep things
tidy.
The code is moved as-is here (aside from a few unused #define's that are
just dropped); further changes will come in future patches.
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324210415.2434992-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
