| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[edit by mlyle: include sched/debug.h to get __sched]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Eliminates cases where sync can race and fail to complete / get stuck.
Removes many status flags and simplifies entering-and-exiting closure
sleeping behaviors.
[mlyle: fixed conflicts due to changed return behavior in mainline.
extended commit comment, and squashed down two commits that were mostly
contradictory to get to this state. Changed __set_current_state to
set_current_state per Jens review comment]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Commit 09b3efec ("bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist
API") replaces the following while loop by llist_for_each_entry(),
-
- while (reverse) {
- cl = container_of(reverse, struct closure, list);
- reverse = llist_next(reverse);
-
+ llist_for_each_entry(cl, reverse, list) {
closure_set_waiting(cl, 0);
closure_sub(cl, CLOSURE_WAITING + 1);
}
This modification introduces a potential race by iterating a corrupted
list. Here is how it happens.
In the above modification, closure_sub() may wake up a process which is
waiting on reverse list. If this process decides to wait again by calling
closure_wait(), its cl->list will be added to another wait list. Then
when llist_for_each_entry() continues to iterate next node, it will travel
on another new wait list which is added in closure_wait(), not the
original reverse list in __closure_wake_up(). It is more probably to
happen on UP machine because the waked up process may preempt the process
which wakes up it.
Use llist_for_each_entry_safe() will fix the issue, the safe version fetch
next node before waking up a process. Then the copy of next node will make
sure list iteration stays on original reverse list.
Fixes: 09b3efec81de ("bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reported-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
There is no return in continue_at(), update the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
|
|
WORK_STRUCT_PENDING is a mask for testing the pending bit.
test_bit() expects the number of the bit and we need to
use WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT there.
Also work_data_bits() is defined in workqueues.h now.
I have noticed this just by chance when looking how
WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT is used. The change is compile
tested.
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
|
Also flesh out the documentation a bit
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
|
|
With a the recent bcache refactoring, some of the closure code isn't
needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
|
|
In the far-too-complicated closure code - closures can have destructors,
for probably dubious reasons; they get run after the closure is no
longer waiting on anything but before dropping the parent ref, intended
just for freeing whatever memory the closure is embedded in.
Trouble is, when remaining goes to 0 and we've got nothing more to run -
we also have to unlock the closure, setting remaining to -1. If there's
a destructor, that unlock isn't doing anything - nobody could be trying
to lock it if we're about to free it - but if the unlock _is needed...
that check for a destructor was racy. Argh.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
|
|
Commit 82a84eaf7e51ba3da0c36cbc401034a4e943492d left a return 0 in
closure_debug_init(). Whoops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
config: make ARCH=i386 allmodconfig
All error/warnings:
drivers/md/bcache/bset.c: In function 'bch_ptr_bad':
>> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c:164:2: warning: format '%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
drivers/md/bcache/debug.c: In function 'bch_pbtree':
>> drivers/md/bcache/debug.c:86:4: warning: format '%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function 'bch_btree_read_done':
>> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:245:8: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
drivers/md/bcache/closure.o: In function `closure_debug_init':
>> (.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
>> drivers/md/bcache/super.o:super.c:(.init.text+0x0): first defined here
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Does writethrough and writeback caching, handles unclean shutdown, and
has a bunch of other nifty features motivated by real world usage.
See the wiki at http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org for more.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
|
