| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The memory controller and external memory controller found on Tegra234
is similar to the version found on earlier SoCs but supports a number of
new memory clients.
Add initial memory client definitions for the Tegra234 so that the SMMU
stream ID override registers can be properly programmed at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506132312.3910637-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
|
|
Keep the directory structure consistent by splitting the Tegra194 data
into a separate file.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602163302.120041-13-thierry.reding@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
|
|
The Tegra210 (and earlier) driver now supports all the functionality
that the Tegra186 (and later) driver does, so they can be unified.
Note that previously the Tegra186 (and later) driver could be unloaded,
even if that was perhaps not very useful. Older chips don't support that
yet, but once they do this code can be reenabled.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602163302.120041-11-thierry.reding@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
|
|
This patch includes the sequence for clock tuning and the dynamic
training mechanism for the clock above 800MHz.
And historically there have been different sequences to change the EMC
clock. The sequence to be used is specified in the EMC table.
However, for the currently supported upstreaming platform, only the most
recent sequence is used. So only support that in this patch.
Based on the work of Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
This is the initial patch for Tegra210 EMC frequency scaling. It has the
code to program various aspects of the EMC that are standardized, but it
does not yet include the specific programming sequence needed for clock
scaling.
The driver is designed to support LPDDR4 SDRAM. Devices that use LPDDR4
need to perform training of the RAM before it can be used. Firmware will
perform this training during early boot and pass a table of supported
frequencies to the kernel via device tree.
For the frequencies above 800 MHz, periodic retraining is needed to
compensate for changes in timing. This periodic training will have to be
performed until the frequency drops back to or below 800 MHz.
This driver provides helpers used during this runtime retraining that
will be used by the sequence specific code in a follow-up patch.
Based on work by Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
The memory and external memory controllers on Tegra194 are very similar
to their predecessors from Tegra186. Add the necessary SoC-specific data
to support the newer versions.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add a Tegra186 (and later) EMC driver that reads the EMC DVFS tables
from BPMP and uses the EMC clock to change the external memory clock.
This currently only provides a debugfs interface to show the available
frequencies and set lower and upper limits of the allowed range. This
can be used for testing the various frequencies. The goal is to
eventually integrate this with the interconnect framework so that the
EMC frequency can be scaled based on demand from memory clients.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Introduce driver for the External Memory Controller (EMC) found on Tegra30
chips, it controls the external DRAM on the board. The purpose of this
driver is to program memory timing for external memory on the EMC clock
rate change.
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Introduce driver for the External Memory Controller (EMC) found on Tegra20
chips, which controls the external DRAM on the board. The purpose of this
driver is to program memory timing for external memory on the EMC clock
rate change.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Tegra30+ has some minor differences in registers / bits layout compared
to Tegra20. Let's squash Tegra20 driver into the common tegra-mc driver
in a preparation for the upcoming MC hot reset controls implementation,
avoiding code duplication.
Note that this currently doesn't report the value of MC_GART_ERROR_REQ
because it is located within the GART register area and cannot be safely
accessed from the MC driver (this happens to work only by accident). The
proper solution is to integrate the GART driver with the MC driver, much
like is done for the Tegra SMMU, but that is an invasive change and will
be part of a separate patch series.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
The memory controller found on Tegra186 is different in some respects to
its predecessors. Most notably it no longer implements an SMMU, but does
assign ARM SMMU stream IDs for each memory client instead.
Provide a driver that programs these registers so that memory clients
can translate addresses via the ARM SMMU.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add the table of memory clients and SWGROUPs for Tegra210 to enable SMMU
support for this new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux into next/drivers
Merge "ARM: tegra: Add EMC driver for v4.2-rc1" from Thierry Reding:
This introduces the EMC driver that's required to scale the external
memory frequency.
* tag 'tegra-for-4.2-emc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux:
memory: tegra: Add EMC frequency debugfs entry
memory: tegra: Add EMC (external memory controller) driver
memory: tegra: Add API needed by the EMC driver
of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings
of: Document timings subnode of nvidia,tegra-mc
|
|
Implements functionality needed to change the rate of the memory bus
clock.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
The memory controller on Tegra132 is very similar to the one found on
Tegra124. But the Denver CPUs don't have an outer cache, so dcache
maintenance is done slightly differently.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
The memory controller on NVIDIA Tegra exposes various knobs that can be
used to tune the behaviour of the clients attached to it.
Currently this driver sets up the latency allowance registers to the HW
defaults. Eventually an API should be exported by this driver (via a
custom API or a generic subsystem) to allow clients to register latency
requirements.
This driver also registers an IOMMU (SMMU) that's implemented by the
memory controller. It is supported on Tegra30, Tegra114 and Tegra124
currently. Tegra20 has a GART instead.
The Tegra SMMU operates on memory clients and SWGROUPs. A memory client
is a unidirectional, special-purpose DMA master. A SWGROUP represents a
set of memory clients that form a logical functional unit corresponding
to a single device. Typically a device has two clients: one client for
read transactions and one client for write transactions, but there are
also devices that have only read clients, but many of them (such as the
display controllers).
Because there is no 1:1 relationship between memory clients and devices
the driver keeps a table of memory clients and the SWGROUPs that they
belong to per SoC. Note that this is an exception and due to the fact
that the SMMU is tightly integrated with the rest of the Tegra SoC. The
use of these tables is discouraged in drivers for generic IOMMU devices
such as the ARM SMMU because the same IOMMU could be used in any number
of SoCs and keeping such tables for each SoC would not scale.
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
