| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This comment is no longer true so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
So far OOB have never been used in SPI-NAND, add the missing memcpy to
make it work properly.
Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Even if this is not supposed to happen, there is no reason to fail the
probe if it was explicitly requested to use no ECC engine at all (for
instance, during development). This condition is met by just
commenting out the error on the OOB free bytes count after the
assignation of an ECC engine if none was provided (any other situation
would error out much earlier anyway).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Now that all the logic is available in the NAND core, let's use it
from the SPI-NAND core. Right now there is no functional change as the
default ECC engine for SPI-NANDs is set to 'on-die', but user can now
use software correction if they want to by just setting the right
properties in the DT.
Also note that the OOB layout handling is removed from the SPI-NAND
core as each ECC engine is supposed to handle it by it's own; users
should not be aware of that.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Add the logic in the NAND core to find the right ECC engine depending
on the NAND chip requirements and the user desires. Right now, the
choice may be made between (more will come):
* software Hamming
* software BCH
* on-die (SPI-NAND devices only)
Once the ECC engine has been found, the ECC engine must be
configured.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201001102014.20100-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The SPI-NAND layer default is on-die ECC because until now it was the
only one supported. New SPI-NAND chip flavors might use something else
as ECC engine provider but this will always be the default if the user
does not choose explicitly something else.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Before making use of the ECC engines, we must retrieve them. Add the
necessary boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Make use of the existing functions taken from the SPI-NAND core to
instantiate an on-die ECC engine specific to the SPI-NAND core. The
next step will be to tweak the core to use this object instead of
calling the helpers directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Prepare the creation of a SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine by gathering the
ECC-related code earlier enough in the core to avoid the need for
forward declarations.
The next step is to actually create that engine by implementing the
generic ECC interface.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
One comment in the SPI-NAND core is not very clear, fix it to ease the
understanding of what the block does.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200930154109.3922-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Before making use of the ECC engines, we must retrieve them. Add the
boilerplate for the ones already available: software engines (Hamming
and BCH).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-21-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Let's continue introducing the generic ECC engine abstraction in the
NAND subsystem by instantiating a second ECC engine: software
Hamming.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-20-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
There is no reason to always embed the software Hamming ECC engine
implementation. By default it is (with raw NAND), but we can let the
user decide.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-19-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Most of the includes are simply useless, drop them.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-18-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
This code is meant to be reused by the SPI-NAND core. Now that the
driver has been cleaned and reorganized, use a generic ECC engine
object to store the driver's data instead of accessing members of the
nand_chip structure. This means adding proper init/cleanup helpers.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Prefix by ecc_sw_hamming_ the functions which should be internal only
but are exported for "raw" operations.
Prefix by nand_ecc_sw_hamming_ the other functions which will be used
in the context of the declaration of an Hamming proper ECC engine
object.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Various style fixes.
There is not functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Some functions should never have been exported (the ones prefixed by
__*), in this case simply drop the documentation, we never want
anybody to use this function from the outside.
For the other functions, enhance the style.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The include file pretends being the header for "ECC algorithm", while
it is just the header for the Hamming implementation. Make this clear
by rewording the sentence.
Do the same with the module description.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Hamming ECC code might be later re-used by the SPI NAND layer.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
nand_ecc_ctrl embeds a private pointer which only has a meaning in the
sunxi driver. This structure will soon be deprecated, but as this
field is actually not needed, let's just drop it.
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Let's continue introducing the generic ECC engine abstraction in the
NAND subsystem by instantiating a first ECC engine: the software
BCH one.
While at it, make a very tidy ecc_sw_bch_init() function and move all
the sanity checks and user input management in
nand_ecc_sw_bch_init_ctx(). This second helper will be called from the
raw RAND core.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
This code is meant to be reused by the SPI-NAND core. Now that the
driver has been cleaned and reorganized, use a generic ECC engine
object to store the driver's data instead of accessing members of the
nand_chip structure.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
These functions must be usable by the main NAND core, so their names
must be technology-agnostic as well as the parameters. Hence, we pass
a generic nand_device instead of a raw nand_chip structure.
As it seems that changing the raw NAND functions to always pass a
generic NAND device is a lost of time, we prefer to create dedicated
raw NAND wrappers that will be useful in the near future to do the
translation.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Like for any other compilation option, use the IS_ENABLED() macro
instead of hardcoding it.
By droping this helper we can get rid of the BCH header in nandsim.c.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The NAND BCH control structure has nothing to do outside of this
driver, all users of the nand_bch_init/free() functions just save it
to chip->ecc.priv so do it in this driver directly and return a
regular error code instead.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Fix function headers, capitals and reword a little bit the comments
to make this driver more readable.
There is not functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
BCH ECC code might be later re-used by the SPI NAND layer.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Currently, BCH and Hamming engine are sharing the same
tweaking/restoring I/O mechanism: they need the I/O request to fully
cover the main/OOB area. Let's make this code generic as sharing the
code between two drivers is already a win. Maybe other ECC engine
drivers will need it too.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-20-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-18-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip().
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip(), a NAND controller
hook.
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
The probe function is only supposed to initialize the controller
hardware but not the ECC engine. Indeed, we don't know anything about
the NAND chip(s) at this stage. Let's move the logic initializing the
ECC engine, even pretty simple, to the ->attach_chip() hook which gets
called during nand_scan() routine, after the NAND chip discovery. As
the previously mentioned logic is supposed to parse the DT for us, it
is likely that the chip->ecc.* entries be overwritten. So let's avoid
this by moving these lines to ->attach_chip(), a NAND controller
hook.
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Reported-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201113123424.32233-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
|
|
Since commit d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user
input parsing bits"), ECC are broken in FMC2 driver in case of
nand-ecc-step-size and nand-ecc-strength are not set in the device tree.
To avoid this issue, the default settings are now set in
stm32_fmc2_nfc_attach_chip function.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Fixes: d7157ff49a5b ("mtd: rawnand: Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1604064819-26861-1-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com
|
|
If a flash chip has more than 16MB capacity but its BFPT reports
BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_OR_4, the spi-nor framework defaults to 3.
The check in spi_nor_set_addr_width() doesn't catch it because addr_width
did get set. This fixes that check.
Fixes: f9acd7fa80be ("mtd: spi-nor: sfdp: default to addr_width of 3 for configurable widths")
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen <bert@biot.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201006132346.12652-1-bert@biot.com
|
