summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ipsec.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-12-03ixgbevf: stop attempting IPSEC offload on Mailbox API 1.5Jacob Keller
Commit 339f28964147 ("ixgbevf: Add support for new mailbox communication between PF and VF") added support for v1.5 of the PF to VF mailbox communication API. This commit mistakenly enabled IPSEC offload for API v1.5. No implementation of the v1.5 API has support for IPSEC offload. This offload is only supported by the Linux PF as mailbox API v1.4. In fact, the v1.5 API is not implemented in any Linux PF. Attempting to enable IPSEC offload on a PF which supports v1.5 API will not work. Only the Linux upstream ixgbe and ixgbevf support IPSEC offload, and only as part of the v1.4 API. Fix the ixgbevf Linux driver to stop attempting IPSEC offload when the mailbox API does not support it. The existing API design choice makes it difficult to support future API versions, as other non-Linux hosts do not implement IPSEC offload. If we add support for v1.5 to the Linux PF, then we lose support for IPSEC offload. A full solution likely requires a new mailbox API with a proper negotiation to check that IPSEC is actually supported by the host. Fixes: 339f28964147 ("ixgbevf: Add support for new mailbox communication between PF and VF") Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2023-01-26ixgbevf: fill IPsec state validation failure reasonLeon Romanovsky
Rely on extack to return failure reason. Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-01-26xfrm: extend add state callback to set failure reasonLeon Romanovsky
Almost all validation logic is in the drivers, but they are missing reliable way to convey failure reason to userspace applications. Let's use extack to return this information to users. Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-12-05xfrm: allow state packet offload modeLeon Romanovsky
Allow users to configure xfrm states with packet offload mode. The packet mode must be requested both for policy and state, and such requires us to do not implement fallback. We explicitly return an error if requested packet mode can't be configured. Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2022-05-06ixgbe: propagate XFRM offload state direction instead of flagsLeon Romanovsky
Convert the ixgbe driver to rely on XFRM offload state direction instead of flags bits that were not checked at all. Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2021-11-17ixgbevf: Add support for new mailbox communication between PF and VFRadoslaw Tyl
Provide improved mailbox communication, between PF and VF, which is defined as API version 1.5. Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Tyl <radoslawx.tyl@intel.com> Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tony.brelinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2021-11-17ixgbevf: Mailbox improvementsRadoslaw Tyl
Improve reliability of the mailbox communication and remove its potential flaws that may lead to the undefined or faulty behavior. Recently some users reported issues on ESX with 10G Intel NICs which were found to be caused by incorrect implementation of the PF-VF mailbox communication. Technical investigation highlighted areas to improve in the communication between PF or VF that wants to send the message (sender) and the other part which receives the message (receiver): - Locking the mailbox when the sender wants to send a message - Releasing the mailbox when the communication ends - Returning the result of the mailbox message execution Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Tyl <radoslawx.tyl@intel.com> Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tony.brelinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2021-11-17ixgbevf: Rename MSGTYPE to SUCCESS and FAILURERadoslaw Tyl
There is name similarity within IXGBE_VT_MSGTYPE_ACK and PFMAILBOX.ACK / VFMAILBOX.ACK. MSGTYPE macros are renamed to SUCCESS and FAILURE because they are not specified in datasheet and now will be easily distinguishable. Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Tyl <radoslawx.tyl@intel.com> Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tony.brelinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2021-07-06ixgbevf: use xso.real_dev instead of xso.dev in callback functions of struct ↵Taehee Yoo
xfrmdev_ops There are two pointers in struct xfrm_state_offload, *dev, *real_dev. These are used in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops. The *dev points whether bonding interface or real interface. If bonding ipsec offload is used, it points bonding interface If not, it points real interface. And real_dev always points real interface. So, ixgbevf should always use real_dev instead of dev. Of course, real_dev always not be null. Test commands: ip link add bond0 type bond #eth0 is ixgbevf interface ip link set eth0 master bond0 ip link set bond0 up ip x s add proto esp dst 14.1.1.1 src 15.1.1.1 spi 0x07 mode \ transport reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \ 0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 sel src 14.0.0.52/24 \ dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp offload dev bond0 dir in Splat looks like: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 6 PID: 688 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168 RIP: 0010:ixgbevf_ipsec_find_empty_idx+0x28/0x1b0 [ixgbevf] Code: 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 40 84 f6 0f 84 9c 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 01 0f 8e 4c 01 00 00 66 81 3b 00 04 0f RSP: 0018:ffff8880089af390 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff8880089af4f8 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: fffffbfff4287e11 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff888005de8908 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88810936a000 R14: ffff88810936a000 R15: ffff888004d78040 FS: 00007fdf9883a680(0000) GS:ffff88811a400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055bc14adbf40 CR3: 000000000b87c005 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ixgbevf_ipsec_add_sa+0x1bf/0x9c0 [ixgbevf] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 ? ixgbevf_ipsec_parse_proto_keys.isra.9+0x280/0x280 [ixgbevf] ? lock_acquire+0x191/0x720 ? bond_ipsec_add_sa+0x48/0x350 [bonding] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0 ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x91/0xa0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0 bond_ipsec_add_sa+0x193/0x350 [bonding] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x2a9/0x770 ? memcpy+0x38/0x60 xfrm_add_sa+0x2278/0x3b10 [xfrm_user] ? xfrm_get_policy+0xaa0/0xaa0 [xfrm_user] ? register_lock_class+0x1750/0x1750 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x331/0x660 [xfrm_user] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 ? xfrm_user_state_lookup.constprop.39+0x320/0x320 [xfrm_user] ? find_held_lock+0x3a/0x1c0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1210/0x1210 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 [ ... ] Fixes: 272c2330adc9 ("xfrm: bail early on slave pass over skb") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-03-04ixgbe: fail to create xfrm offload of IPsec tunnel mode SAAntony Antony
Based on talks and indirect references ixgbe IPsec offlod do not support IPsec tunnel mode offload. It can only support IPsec transport mode offload. Now explicitly fail when creating non transport mode SA with offload to avoid false performance expectations. Fixes: 63a67fe229ea ("ixgbe: add ipsec offload add and remove SA") Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org> Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io> Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2018-12-19xfrm: prefer secpath_set over secpath_dupFlorian Westphal
secpath_set is a wrapper for secpath_dup that will not perform an allocation if the secpath attached to the skb has a reference count of one, i.e., it doesn't need to be COW'ed. Also, secpath_dup doesn't attach the secpath to the skb, it leaves this to the caller. Use secpath_set in places that immediately assign the return value to skb. This allows to remove skb->sp without touching these spots again. secpath_dup can eventually be removed in followup patch. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-19drivers: net: intel: use secpath helpers in more placesFlorian Westphal
Use skb_sec_path and secpath_exists helpers where possible. This reduces noise in followup patch that removes skb->sp pointer. v2: no changes, preseve acks from v1. Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.lee.nelson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-10-03ixgbevf: off by one in ixgbevf_ipsec_tx()Dan Carpenter
The ipsec->tx_tbl[] array has IXGBE_IPSEC_MAX_SA_COUNT elements so the > should be a >=. Fixes: 0062e7cc955e ("ixgbevf: add VF IPsec offload code") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
2018-10-03ixgbevf: fix msglen for ipsec mbx messagesShannon Nelson
Don't be fancy with message lengths, just set lengths to number of dwords, not bytes. Fixes: 0062e7cc955e ("ixgbevf: add VF IPsec offload code") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
2018-08-28ixgbevf: add VF IPsec offload codeShannon Nelson
Add the IPsec offload support code. This is based off of the similar code in ixgbe, but instead of writing the SA registers, the VF asks the PF to setup the offload by sending the offload information to the PF via the standard mailbox. Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>