| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
While the RTC framework intends to only handle dates after 1970 for
consumers, time conversion must also work for earlier dates to cover
e.g. storing dates beyond an RTC's range_max. This is most relevant for
the rtc-mt6397 driver that has
range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_1900;
range_max = mktime64(2027, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59);
and so needs working support for timestamps in 1900 starting in less than
three years.
So shift the tested interval of timestamps to also cover years 1900 to
1970.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-5-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
To cover calculation of the time and wday in the rtc kunit test also check
tm_hour, tm_min, tm_sec and tm_wday of the rtc_time calculated by
rtc_time64_to_tm().
There are no surprises, the two tests making use of
rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range() continue to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-4-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
This is easier to handle because you can just consult date(1) to convert
between a seconds-since-1970 value and a date string:
$ date --utc -d @3661
Thu Jan 1 01:01:01 AM UTC 1970
$ date -d "Jan 1 12:00:00 AM UTC 1900" +%s
-2208988800
The intended side effect is that this prepares the test for dates before
1970. The division of a negative value by 86400 doesn't result in the
desired days-since-1970 value as e.g. secs=-82739 should map to days=-1.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-3-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/lib_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/rtc-goldfish.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/rtc-rc5t583.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.o
Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro to all
files which have a MODULE_LICENSE(). This includes rtc-mpc5121.c,
which does not produce a warning with the x86 allmodconfig since it is
not built for x86, but it may cause this warning with Freescale PPC
configurations.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-md-drivers-rtc-v1-1-5f44222adfae@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
On slow systems, the rtc unit test may result in soft lockups and/or
generate messages such as
# rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range: Test should be marked slow (runtime: 34.253230015s)
# rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
The test covers a date range of 160,000 years, resulting in the long
runtime.
Unit tests running for more than 1 second are supposed to be marked as
slow. Just marking the test as slow would prevent it from running when
slow tests are disabled, which would not be desirable. At the same time,
the current test range of 160,000 years seems to be of limited value.
Split the test into two parts, one covering a range of 1,000 years and
the other covering the current range of 160,000 years. Mark the 160,000
year test as slow to be able to separate it from the faster test.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313174221.1999654-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
__printf attribute.
Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As the documentation states, "The exact license information can only be
determined via the license information in the corresponding source files."
and the SPDX identifier has the proper information.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810212008.631359-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
|
|
The current implementation of rtc_time64_to_tm() contains unnecessary
loops, branches and look-up tables. The new one uses an arithmetic-based
algorithm appeared in [1] and is approximately 4.3 times faster (YMMV).
The drawback is that the new code isn't intuitive and contains many 'magic
numbers' (not unusual for this type of algorithm). However, [1] justifies
all those numbers and, given this function's history, the code is unlikely
to need much maintenance, if any at all.
Add a KUnit test case that checks every day in a 160,000 years interval
starting on 1970-01-01 against the expected result. Add a new config
RTC_LIB_KUNIT_TEST symbol to give the option to run this test suite.
[1] Neri, Schneider, "Euclidean Affine Functions and Applications to
Calendar Algorithms". https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06959
Signed-off-by: Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@gmail.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624201343.85441-1-cassio.neri@gmail.com
|
