summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-03-05btrfs: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag useChengming Zhou
The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag used to be implemented in SLAB, which was removed as of v6.8-rc1, so it became a dead flag since the commit 16a1d968358a ("mm/slab: remove mm/slab.c and slab_def.h"). And the series[1] went on to mark it obsolete to avoid confusion for users. Here we can just remove all its users, which has no functional change. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223-slab-cleanup-flags-v2-1-02f1753e8303@suse.cz/ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: use KMEM_CACHE() to create btrfs_path cacheKunwu Chan
Use the KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of kmem_cache_create() to simplify the creation of SLAB caches when the default values are used. Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: unify handling of return values of btrfs_insert_empty_items()David Sterba
The error values returned by btrfs_insert_empty_items() are following the common patter of 0/-errno, but some callers check for a value > 0, which can't happen. Document that and update calls to not expect positive values. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: cache folio size and shift in extent_bufferQu Wenruo
After the conversion to folio interfaces (but without the patch to enable larger folio allocation), there is an LTP report about observable performance drop on metadata heavy operations. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/202312221750.571925bd-oliver.sang@intel.com/ This drop is caused by the extra code of calculating the folio_size()/folio_shift(), instead of the old hard coded PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT. To slightly reduce the overhead, just cache both folio_size and folio_shift in extent_buffer. The two new members (u32 folio_size and u8 folio_shift) are stored inside the holes of extent_buffer. folio_size is shared with len, which is reduced to u32. The size of eb does not change. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: migrate get_eb_page_index() and get_eb_offset_in_page() to foliosQu Wenruo
These two functions are still using the old page based code, which is not going to handle larger folios at all. The migration itself is going to involve the following changes: - PAGE_SIZE -> folio_size() - PAGE_SHIFT -> folio_shift() - get_eb_page_index() -> get_eb_folio_index() - get_eb_offset_in_page() -> get_eb_offset_in_folio() And since we're going to support larger folios, although above straight conversion is good enough, this patch would add extra comments in the involved functions to explain why the same single line code can now cover 3 cases: - folio_size == PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, nodesize >= PAGE_SIZE The common, non-subpage case with per-page folio. - folio_size > PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, nodesize >= PAGE_SIZE The incoming larger folio, non-subpage case. - folio_size == PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE, nodesize < PAGE_SIZE The existing subpage case, we won't larger folio anyway. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: migrate extent_buffer::pages[] to folioQu Wenruo
For now extent_buffer::pages[] are still only accepting single page pointer, thus we can migrate to folios pretty easily. As for single page, page and folio are 1:1 mapped, including their page flags. This patch would just do the conversion from struct page to struct folio, providing the first step to higher order folio in the future. This conversion is pretty simple: - extent_buffer::pages[] -> extent_buffer::folios[] - page_address(eb->pages[i]) -> folio_address(eb->pages[i]) - eb->pages[i] -> folio_page(eb->folios[i], 0) There would be more specific cleanups preparing for the incoming higher order folio support. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: make the logic from btrfs_block_can_be_shared() easier to readFilipe Manana
The logic in btrfs_block_can_be_shared() is hard to follow as we have a lot of conditions in a single if statement including a subexpression with a logical or and two nested if statements inside the main if statement. Make this easier to read by using separate if statements that return immediately when we find a condition that determines if a block can be or can not be shared. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-15btrfs: use bool for return type of btrfs_block_can_be_shared()Filipe Manana
Currently btrfs_block_can_be_shared() returns an int that is used as a boolean. Since it all it needs is to return true or false, and it can't return errors for example, change the return type from int to bool to make it a bit more readable and obvious. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-11-13Merge tag 'for-6.7-rc1-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - fix potential overflow in returned value from SEARCH_TREE_V2 ioctl on 32bit architecture - zoned mode fixes: - drop unnecessary write pointer check for RAID0/RAID1/RAID10 profiles, now it works because of raid-stripe-tree - wait for finishing the zone when direct IO needs a new allocation - simple quota fixes: - pass correct owning root pointer when cleaning up an aborted transaction - fix leaking some structures when processing delayed refs - change key type number of BTRFS_EXTENT_OWNER_REF_KEY, reorder it before inline refs that are supposed to be sorted, keeping the original number would complicate a lot of things; this change needs an updated version of btrfs-progs to work and filesystems need to be recreated - fix error pointer dereference after failure to allocate fs devices - fix race between accounting qgroup extents and removing a qgroup * tag 'for-6.7-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: make OWNER_REF_KEY type value smallest among inline refs btrfs: fix qgroup record leaks when using simple quotas btrfs: fix race between accounting qgroup extents and removing a qgroup btrfs: fix error pointer dereference after failure to allocate fs devices btrfs: make found_logical_ret parameter mandatory for function queue_scrub_stripe() btrfs: get correct owning_root when dropping snapshot btrfs: zoned: wait for data BG to be finished on direct IO allocation btrfs: zoned: drop no longer valid write pointer check btrfs: directly return 0 on no error code in btrfs_insert_raid_extent() btrfs: use u64 for buffer sizes in the tree search ioctls
2023-11-03btrfs: get correct owning_root when dropping snapshotJosef Bacik
Dave reported a bug where we were aborting the transaction while trying to cleanup the squota reservation for an extent. This turned out to be because we're doing btrfs_header_owner(next) in do_walk_down when we decide to free the block. However in this code block we haven't explicitly read next, so it could be stale. We would then get whatever garbage happened to be in the pages at this point. The commit that introduced that is "btrfs: track owning root in btrfs_ref". Fix this by saving the owner_root when we do the btrfs_lookup_extent_info(). We always do this in do_walk_down, it is how we make the decision of whether or not to delete the block. This is cheap because we've already done the extent item lookup at this point, so it's straightforward to just grab the owner root as well. Then we can use this when deleting the metadata block without needing to force a read of the extent buffer to find the owner. This fixes the problem that Dave reported. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-30Merge tag 'for-6.7-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "New features: - raid-stripe-tree New tree for logical file extent mapping where the physical mapping may not match on multiple devices. This is now used in zoned mode to implement RAID0/RAID1* profiles, but can be used in non-zoned mode as well. The support for RAID56 is in development and will eventually fix the problems with the current implementation. This is a backward incompatible feature and has to be enabled at mkfs time. - simple quota accounting (squota) A simplified mode of qgroup that accounts all space on the initial extent owners (a subvolume), the snapshots are then cheap to create and delete. The deletion of snapshots in fully accounting qgroups is a known CPU/IO performance bottleneck. The squota is not suitable for the general use case but works well for containers where the original subvolume exists for the whole time. This is a backward incompatible feature as it needs extending some structures, but can be enabled on an existing filesystem. - temporary filesystem fsid (temp_fsid) The fsid identifies a filesystem and is hard coded in the structures, which disallows mounting the same fsid found on different devices. For a single device filesystem this is not strictly necessary, a new temporary fsid can be generated on mount e.g. after a device is cloned. This will be used by Steam Deck for root partition A/B testing, or can be used for VM root images. Other user visible changes: - filesystems with partially finished metadata_uuid conversion cannot be mounted anymore and the uuid fixup has to be done by btrfs-progs (btrfstune). Performance improvements: - reduce reservations for checksum deletions (with enabled free space tree by factor of 4), on a sample workload on file with many extents the deletion time decreased by 12% - make extent state merges more efficient during insertions, reduce rb-tree iterations (run time of critical functions reduced by 5%) Core changes: - the integrity check functionality has been removed, this was a debugging feature and removal does not affect other integrity checks like checksums or tree-checker - space reservation changes: - more efficient delayed ref reservations, this avoids building up too much work or overusing or exhausting the global block reserve in some situations - move delayed refs reservation to the transaction start time, this prevents some ENOSPC corner cases related to exhaustion of global reserve - improvements in reducing excessive reservations for block group items - adjust overcommit logic in near full situations, account for one more chunk to eventually allocate metadata chunk, this is mostly relevant for small filesystems (<10GiB) - single device filesystems are scanned but not registered (except seed devices), this allows temp_fsid to work - qgroup iterations do not need GFP_ATOMIC allocations anymore - cleanups, refactoring, reduced data structure size, function parameter simplifications, error handling fixes" * tag 'for-6.7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (156 commits) btrfs: open code timespec64 in struct btrfs_inode btrfs: remove redundant log root tree index assignment during log sync btrfs: remove redundant initialization of variable dirty in btrfs_update_time() btrfs: sysfs: show temp_fsid feature btrfs: disable the device add feature for temp-fsid btrfs: disable the seed feature for temp-fsid btrfs: update comment for temp-fsid, fsid, and metadata_uuid btrfs: remove pointless empty log context list check when syncing log btrfs: update comment for struct btrfs_inode::lock btrfs: remove pointless barrier from btrfs_sync_file() btrfs: add and use helpers for reading and writing last_trans_committed btrfs: add and use helpers for reading and writing fs_info->generation btrfs: add and use helpers for reading and writing log_transid btrfs: add and use helpers for reading and writing last_log_commit btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability btrfs: add helper function find_fsid_by_disk btrfs: stop reserving excessive space for block group item insertions btrfs: stop reserving excessive space for block group item updates btrfs: reorder btrfs_inode to fill gaps btrfs: open code btrfs_ordered_inode_tree in btrfs_inode ...
2023-10-23btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffer after snapshotting a new subvolumeFilipe Manana
When creating a snapshot of a subvolume that was created in the current transaction, we can end up not persisting a dirty extent buffer that is referenced by the snapshot, resulting in IO errors due to checksum failures when trying to read the extent buffer later from disk. A sequence of steps that leads to this is the following: 1) At ioctl.c:create_subvol() we allocate an extent buffer, with logical address 36007936, for the leaf/root of a new subvolume that has an ID of 291. We mark the extent buffer as dirty, and at this point the subvolume tree has a single node/leaf which is also its root (level 0); 2) We no longer commit the transaction used to create the subvolume at create_subvol(). We used to, but that was recently removed in commit 1b53e51a4a8f ("btrfs: don't commit transaction for every subvol create"); 3) The transaction used to create the subvolume has an ID of 33, so the extent buffer 36007936 has a generation of 33; 4) Several updates happen to subvolume 291 during transaction 33, several files created and its tree height changes from 0 to 1, so we end up with a new root at level 1 and the extent buffer 36007936 is now a leaf of that new root node, which is extent buffer 36048896. The commit root remains as 36007936, since we are still at transaction 33; 5) Creation of a snapshot of subvolume 291, with an ID of 292, starts at ioctl.c:create_snapshot(). This triggers a commit of transaction 33 and we end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), in the critical section of a transaction commit. There we COW the root of subvolume 291, which is extent buffer 36048896. The COW operation returns extent buffer 36048896, since there's no need to COW because the extent buffer was created in this transaction and it was not written yet. The we call btrfs_copy_root() against the root node 36048896. During this operation we allocate a new extent buffer to turn into the root node of the snapshot, copy the contents of the root node 36048896 into this snapshot root extent buffer, set the owner to 292 (the ID of the snapshot), etc, and then we call btrfs_inc_ref(). This will create a delayed reference for each leaf pointed by the root node with a reference root of 292 - this includes a reference for the leaf 36007936. After that we set the bit BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW in the root's state. Then we call btrfs_insert_dir_item(), to create the directory entry in in the tree of subvolume 291 that points to the snapshot. This ends up needing to modify leaf 36007936 to insert the respective directory items. Because the bit BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW is set for the root's state, we need to COW the leaf. We end up at btrfs_force_cow_block() and then at update_ref_for_cow(). At update_ref_for_cow() we call btrfs_block_can_be_shared() which returns false, despite the fact the leaf 36007936 is shared - the subvolume's root and the snapshot's root point to that leaf. The reason that it incorrectly returns false is because the commit root of the subvolume is extent buffer 36007936 - it was the initial root of the subvolume when we created it. So btrfs_block_can_be_shared() which has the following logic: int btrfs_block_can_be_shared(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *buf) { if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE, &root->state) && buf != root->node && buf != root->commit_root && (btrfs_header_generation(buf) <= btrfs_root_last_snapshot(&root->root_item) || btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC))) return 1; return 0; } Returns false (0) since 'buf' (extent buffer 36007936) matches the root's commit root. As a result, at update_ref_for_cow(), we don't check for the number of references for extent buffer 36007936, we just assume it's not shared and therefore that it has only 1 reference, so we set the local variable 'refs' to 1. Later on, in the final if-else statement at update_ref_for_cow(): static noinline int update_ref_for_cow(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *buf, struct extent_buffer *cow, int *last_ref) { (...) if (refs > 1) { (...) } else { (...) btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty(trans, buf); *last_ref = 1; } } So we mark the extent buffer 36007936 as not dirty, and as a result we don't write it to disk later in the transaction commit, despite the fact that the snapshot's root points to it. Attempting to access the leaf or dumping the tree for example shows that the extent buffer was not written: $ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -t 292 /dev/sdb btrfs-progs v6.2.2 file tree key (292 ROOT_ITEM 33) node 36110336 level 1 items 2 free space 119 generation 33 owner 292 node 36110336 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored a8103e3e checksum calced a8103e3e fs uuid 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79 chunk uuid e8c9c885-78f4-4d31-85fe-89e5f5fd4a07 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) block 36007936 gen 33 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) block 36052992 gen 33 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 total bytes 107374182400 bytes used 38572032 uuid 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79 The respective on disk region is full of zeroes as the device was trimmed at mkfs time. Obviously 'btrfs check' also detects and complains about this: $ btrfs check /dev/sdb Opening filesystem to check... Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb UUID: 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79 generation: 33 (33) [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 bad tree block 36007936, bytenr mismatch, want=36007936, have=0 owner ref check failed [36007936 4096] ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation [3/7] checking free space tree [4/7] checking fs roots checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29 bad tree block 36007936, bytenr mismatch, want=36007936, have=0 The following tree block(s) is corrupted in tree 292: tree block bytenr: 36110336, level: 1, node key: (256, 1, 0) root 292 root dir 256 not found ERROR: errors found in fs roots found 38572032 bytes used, error(s) found total csum bytes: 16048 total tree bytes: 1265664 total fs tree bytes: 1118208 total extent tree bytes: 65536 btree space waste bytes: 562598 file data blocks allocated: 65978368 referenced 36569088 Fix this by updating btrfs_block_can_be_shared() to consider that an extent buffer may be shared if it matches the commit root and if its generation matches the current transaction's generation. This can be reproduced with the following script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash MNT=/mnt/sdi DEV=/dev/sdi # Use a filesystem with a 64K node size so that we have the same node # size on every machine regardless of its page size (on x86_64 default # node size is 16K due to the 4K page size, while on PPC it's 64K by # default). This way we can make sure we are able to create a btree for # the subvolume with a height of 2. mkfs.btrfs -f -n 64K $DEV mount $DEV $MNT btrfs subvolume create $MNT/subvol # Create a few empty files on the subvolume, this bumps its btree # height to 2 (root node at level 1 and 2 leaves). for ((i = 1; i <= 300; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/subvol/file_$i done btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/subvol $MNT/subvol/snap umount $DEV btrfs check $DEV Running it on a 6.5 kernel (or any 6.6-rc kernel at the moment): $ ./test.sh Create subvolume '/mnt/sdi/subvol' Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi/subvol' in '/mnt/sdi/subvol/snap' Opening filesystem to check... Checking filesystem on /dev/sdi UUID: bbdde2ff-7d02-45ca-8a73-3c36f23755a1 [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5 parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5 parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5 Ignoring transid failure owner ref check failed [30539776 65536] ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation [3/7] checking free space tree [4/7] checking fs roots parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5 Ignoring transid failure Wrong key of child node/leaf, wanted: (256, 1, 0), have: (2, 132, 0) Wrong generation of child node/leaf, wanted: 5, have: 7 root 257 root dir 256 not found ERROR: errors found in fs roots found 917504 bytes used, error(s) found total csum bytes: 0 total tree bytes: 851968 total fs tree bytes: 393216 total extent tree bytes: 65536 btree space waste bytes: 736550 file data blocks allocated: 0 referenced 0 A test case for fstests will follow soon. Fixes: 1b53e51a4a8f ("btrfs: don't commit transaction for every subvol create") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: move btrfs_realloc_node() from ctree.c into defrag.cFilipe Manana
btrfs_realloc_node() is only used by the defrag code. Nowadays we have a defrag.c file, so move it, and its helper close_blocks(), into defrag.c. During the move also do a few minor cosmetic changes: 1) Change the return value of close_blocks() from int to bool; 2) Use SZ_32K instead of 32768 at close_blocks(); 3) Make some variables const in btrfs_realloc_node(), 'blocksize' and 'end_slot'; 4) Get rid of 'parent_nritems' variable, in both places where it was used it could be replaced by calling btrfs_header_nritems(parent); 5) Change the type of a couple variables from int to bool; 6) Rename variable 'err' to 'ret', as that's the most common name we use to track the return value of a function; 7) Move some variables from the top scope to the scope of the for loop where they are used. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: export comp_keys() from ctree.c as btrfs_comp_keys()Filipe Manana
Export comp_keys() out of ctree.c, as btrfs_comp_keys(), so that in a later patch we can move out defrag specific code from ctree.c into defrag.c. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: rename and export __btrfs_cow_block()Filipe Manana
Rename and export __btrfs_cow_block() as btrfs_force_cow_block(). This is to allow to move defrag specific code out of ctree.c and into defrag.c in one of the next patches. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: use round_down() to align block offset at btrfs_cow_block()Filipe Manana
At btrfs_cow_block() we can use round_down() to align the extent buffer's logical offset to the start offset of a metadata block group, instead of the less easy to read set of bitwise operations (two plus one subtraction). So replace the bitwise operations with a round_down() call. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: remove noinline attribute from btrfs_cow_block()Filipe Manana
It's pointless to have the noiline attribute for btrfs_cow_block(), as the function is exported and widely used. So remove it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: qgroup: track metadata relocation COW with simple quotaBoris Burkov
Relocation COWs metadata blocks in two cases for the reloc root: - copying the subvolume root item when creating the reloc root - copying a btree node when there is a COW during relocation In both cases, the resulting btree node hits an abnormal code path with respect to the owner field in its btrfs_header. It first creates the root item for the new objectid, which populates the reloc root id, and it at this point that delayed refs are created. Later, it fully copies the old node into the new node (including the original owner field) which overwrites it. This results in a simple quotas mismatch where we run the delayed ref for the reloc root which has no simple quota effect (reloc root is not an fstree) but when we ultimately delete the node, the owner is the real original fstree and we do free the space. To work around this without tampering with the behavior of relocation, add a parameter to btrfs_add_tree_block that lets the relocation code path specify a different owning root than the "operating" root (in this case, owning root is the real root and the operating root is the reloc root). These can naturally be plumbed into delayed refs that have the same concept. Note that this is a double count in some sense, but a relatively natural one, as there are really two extents, and the old one will be deleted soon. This is consistent with how data relocation extents are accounted by simple quotas. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirtyFilipe Manana
When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation. So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code, in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: rename errno identifiers to errorDavid Sterba
We sync the kernel files to userspace and the 'errno' symbol is defined by standard library, which does not matter in kernel but the parameters or local variables could clash. Rename them all. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: reduce arguments of helpers space accounting root itemDavid Sterba
There are two helpers to increase used bytes of root items that add or subtract one node size, we don't need to pass the argument for that. Rename the function so it matches the root item member that gets changed. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: reformat remaining kdoc style commentsDavid Sterba
Function name in the comment does not bring much value to code not exposed as API and we don't stick to the kdoc format anymore. Update formatting of parameter descriptions. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-04btrfs: error out when reallocating block for defrag using a stale transactionFilipe Manana
At btrfs_realloc_node() we have these checks to verify we are not using a stale transaction (a past transaction with an unblocked state or higher), and the only thing we do is to trigger two WARN_ON(). This however is a critical problem, highly unexpected and if it happens it's most likely due to a bug, so we should error out and turn the fs into error state so that such issue is much more easily noticed if it's triggered. The problem is critical because in btrfs_realloc_node() we COW tree blocks, and using such stale transaction will lead to not persisting the extent buffers used for the COW operations, as allocating tree block adds the range of the respective extent buffers to the ->dirty_pages iotree of the transaction, and a stale transaction, in the unlocked state or higher, will not flush dirty extent buffers anymore, therefore resulting in not persisting the tree block and resource leaks (not cleaning the dirty_pages iotree for example). So do the following changes: 1) Return -EUCLEAN if we find a stale transaction; 2) Turn the fs into error state, with error -EUCLEAN, so that no transaction can be committed, and generate a stack trace; 3) Combine both conditions into a single if statement, as both are related and have the same error message; 4) Mark the check as unlikely, since this is not expected to ever happen. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-04btrfs: error when COWing block from a root that is being deletedFilipe Manana
At btrfs_cow_block() we check if the block being COWed belongs to a root that is being deleted and if so we log an error message. However this is an unexpected case and it indicates a bug somewhere, so we should return an error and abort the transaction. So change this in the following ways: 1) Abort the transaction with -EUCLEAN, so that if the issue ever happens it can easily be noticed; 2) Change the logged message level from error to critical, and change the message itself to print the block's logical address and the ID of the root; 3) Return -EUCLEAN to the caller; 4) As this is an unexpected scenario, that should never happen, mark the check as unlikely, allowing the compiler to potentially generate better code. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-04btrfs: error out when COWing block using a stale transactionFilipe Manana
At btrfs_cow_block() we have these checks to verify we are not using a stale transaction (a past transaction with an unblocked state or higher), and the only thing we do is to trigger a WARN with a message and a stack trace. This however is a critical problem, highly unexpected and if it happens it's most likely due to a bug, so we should error out and turn the fs into error state so that such issue is much more easily noticed if it's triggered. The problem is critical because using such stale transaction will lead to not persisting the extent buffer used for the COW operation, as allocating a tree block adds the range of the respective extent buffer to the ->dirty_pages iotree of the transaction, and a stale transaction, in the unlocked state or higher, will not flush dirty extent buffers anymore, therefore resulting in not persisting the tree block and resource leaks (not cleaning the dirty_pages iotree for example). So do the following changes: 1) Return -EUCLEAN if we find a stale transaction; 2) Turn the fs into error state, with error -EUCLEAN, so that no transaction can be committed, and generate a stack trace; 3) Combine both conditions into a single if statement, as both are related and have the same error message; 4) Mark the check as unlikely, since this is not expected to ever happen. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: replace BUG_ON() at split_item() with proper error handlingFilipe Manana
There's no need to BUG_ON() at split_item() if the leaf does not have enough free space for the new item, we can just return -ENOSPC since the caller can deal with errors from split_item(). Also, as this is a very unlikely condition to happen, because the caller has invoked setup_leaf_for_split() before calling split_item(), surround the condition with a WARN_ON() which makes it easier to notice this unexpected condition and tags the if branch with 'unlikely' as well. I've actually once hit this BUG_ON() with some incorrect code changes I had, which was very inconvenient as it required rebooting the VM. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at btrfs_del_ptr()Filipe Manana
At btrfs_del_ptr(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all resources in the context of all callers, and we have to abort because other future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot()) may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after that failure and before the tree mod log based search. This implies btrfs_del_ptr() return an int instead of void, and making all callers check for returned errors. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at insert_ptr()Filipe Manana
At insert_ptr(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all resources in the context of all callers, and we have to abort because other future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot()) may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after that failure and before the tree mod log based search. This implies making insert_ptr() return an int instead of void, and making all callers check for returned errors. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at insert_new_root()Filipe Manana
At insert_new_root(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record the tree mod log operation, just return the error to the callers after releasing the allocated tree block. At this point we haven't made any changes to the b+tree, so we haven't left it in an inconsistent state and therefore have no need to abort the transaction. All we need to do is to unlock and free the extent buffer we just allocated with the purpose of making it the new root. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at push_nodes_for_insert()Filipe Manana
At push_nodes_for_insert(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to the caller. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all resources in this context, and we have to abort because other future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot()) may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after that failure and before the tree mod log based search. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: abort transaction at update_ref_for_cow() when ref count is zeroFilipe Manana
At update_ref_for_cow() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() if we find that the extent buffer has an unexpected ref count of zero, however we can simply use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to turn the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs to RO mode as well. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a stack trace which makes it more useful. Also, as this is a very unexpected situation, indicating a serious corruption/inconsistency, tag the if branch as 'unlikely', set the error code to -EUCLEAN instead of -EROFS, and log an explicit message. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: abort transaction at balance_level() when left child is missingFilipe Manana
At balance_level() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() when the middle child only has 1 item and the left child is missing, however we can simply use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to turn the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs to RO mode. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a stack trace which makes it more useful. Also, as this is a highly unexpected case and it's about a b+tree inconsistency, change the error code from -EROFS to -EUCLEAN, tag the if branch as 'unlikely' and log an explicit error message. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: avoid unnecessarily setting the fs to RO and error state at ↵Filipe Manana
balance_level() At balance_level(), when trying to promote a child node to a root node, if we fail to read the child we call btrfs_handle_fs_error(), which turns the fs to RO mode and sets it to error state as well, causing any ongoing transaction to abort. This however is not necessary because at that point we have not made any change yet at balance_level(), so any error reading the child node does not leaves us in any inconsistent state. Therefore we can just return the error to the caller. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: rename enospc label to out at balance_level()Filipe Manana
At balance_level() we have this 'enospc' label where we jump to in case we get an error at several places. However that error is certainly not -ENOSPC in call cases, it can be -EIO or -ENOMEM when reading a child extent buffer for example, or -ENOMEM when trying to record tree mod log operations. So to make this less confusing, rename the label to 'out'. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at balance_level()Filipe Manana
At balance_level(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all resources in this context, and we have to abort because other future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot()) may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after that failure and before the tree mod log based search. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at __btrfs_cow_block()Filipe Manana
At __btrfs_cow_block(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record a tree mod log root insertion operation, do a transaction abort instead. There's really no need for the BUG_ON(), we can properly release all resources in this context and turn the filesystem to RO mode and in an error state instead. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: fix extent buffer leak after tree mod log failure at split_node()Filipe Manana
At split_node(), if we fail to log the tree mod log copy operation, we return without unlocking the split extent buffer we just allocated and without decrementing the reference we own on it. Fix this by unlocking it and decrementing the ref count before returning. Fixes: 5de865eebb83 ("Btrfs: fix tree mod logging") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: add missing error handling when logging operation while COWing extent ↵Filipe Manana
buffer When COWing an extent buffer that is not the root node, we need to log in the tree mod log that we replaced a pointer in the parent node, otherwise a tree mod log user doing a search on the b+tree can return incorrect results (that miss something). We are doing the call to btrfs_tree_mod_log_insert_key() but we totally ignore its return value. So fix this by adding the missing error handling, resulting in a transaction abort and freeing the COWed extent buffer. Fixes: f230475e62f7 ("Btrfs: put all block modifications into the tree mod log") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: insert tree mod log move in push_node_leftBoris Burkov
There is a fairly unlikely race condition in tree mod log rewind that can result in a kernel panic which has the following trace: [530.569] BTRFS critical (device sda3): unable to find logical 0 length 4096 [530.585] BTRFS critical (device sda3): unable to find logical 0 length 4096 [530.602] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000002 [530.618] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [530.629] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [530.641] PGD 0 P4D 0 [530.647] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [530.654] CPU: 30 PID: 398973 Comm: below Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S O K 5.12.0-0_fbk13_clang_7455_gb24de3bdb045 #1 [530.680] Hardware name: Quanta Mono Lake-M.2 SATA 1HY9U9Z001G/Mono Lake-M.2 SATA, BIOS F20_3A15 08/16/2017 [530.703] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_map_block+0xaa/0xd00 [530.755] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002c2f7600 EFLAGS: 00010246 [530.767] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff888292e41000 RCX: f2702d8b8be15100 [530.784] RDX: ffff88885fda6fb8 RSI: ffff88885fd973c8 RDI: ffff88885fd973c8 [530.800] RBP: ffff888292e410d0 R08: ffffffff82fd7fd0 R09: 00000000fffeffff [530.816] R10: ffffffff82e57fd0 R11: ffffffff82e57d70 R12: 0000000000000000 [530.832] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: ffffc9002c2f76f0 [530.848] FS: 00007f38d64af000(0000) GS:ffff88885fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [530.866] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [530.880] CR2: 0000000000000002 CR3: 00000002b6770004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [530.896] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [530.912] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [530.928] Call Trace: [530.934] ? btrfs_printk+0x13b/0x18c [530.943] ? btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0x3d/0x130 [530.955] btrfs_map_bio+0x75/0x330 [530.963] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x12a/0x2d0 [530.973] ? btrfs_submit_metadata_bio+0x63/0x100 [530.984] btrfs_submit_metadata_bio+0xa4/0x100 [530.995] submit_extent_page+0x30f/0x360 [531.004] read_extent_buffer_pages+0x49e/0x6d0 [531.015] ? submit_extent_page+0x360/0x360 [531.025] btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x5f/0x150 [531.037] read_tree_block+0x37/0x60 [531.046] read_block_for_search+0x18b/0x410 [531.056] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x198/0x2f0 [531.066] resolve_indirect_ref+0xfe/0x6f0 [531.076] ? ulist_alloc+0x31/0x60 [531.084] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x12e/0x2b0 [531.095] find_parent_nodes+0x720/0x1830 [531.105] ? ulist_alloc+0x10/0x60 [531.113] iterate_extent_inodes+0xea/0x370 [531.123] ? btrfs_previous_extent_item+0x8f/0x110 [531.134] ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240 [531.146] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x98/0xd0 [531.157] ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240 [531.168] btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0xd9/0x180 [531.179] btrfs_ioctl+0xe2/0x2eb0 This occurs when logical inode resolution takes a tree mod log sequence number, and then while backref walking hits a rewind on a busy node which has the following sequence of tree mod log operations (numbers filled in from a specific example, but they are somewhat arbitrary) REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 532 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 531 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 530 ... REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 0 REMOVE slot 455 REMOVE slot 454 REMOVE slot 453 ... REMOVE slot 0 ADD slot 455 ADD slot 454 ADD slot 453 ... ADD slot 0 MOVE src slot 0 -> dst slot 456 nritems 533 REMOVE slot 455 REMOVE slot 454 REMOVE slot 453 ... REMOVE slot 0 When this sequence gets applied via btrfs_tree_mod_log_rewind, it allocates a fresh rewind eb, and first inserts the correct key info for the 533 elements, then overwrites the first 456 of them, then decrements the count by 456 via the add ops, then rewinds the move by doing a memmove from 456:988->0:532. We have never written anything past 532, so that memmove writes garbage into the 0:532 range. In practice, this results in a lot of fully 0 keys. The rewind then puts valid keys into slots 0:455 with the last removes, but 456:532 are still invalid. When search_old_slot uses this eb, if it uses one of those invalid slots, it can then read the extent buffer and issue a bio for offset 0 which ultimately panics looking up extent mappings. This bad tree mod log sequence gets generated when the node balancing code happens to do a balance_node_right followed by a push_node_left while logging in the tree mod log. Illustrated for ebs L and R (left and right): L R start: [XXX|YYY|...] [ZZZ|...|...] balance_node_right: [XXX|YYY|...] [...|ZZZ|...] move Z to make room for Y [XXX|...|...] [YYY|ZZZ|...] copy Y from L to R push_node_left: [XXX|YYY|...] [...|ZZZ|...] copy Y from R to L [XXX|YYY|...] [ZZZ|...|...] move Z into emptied space (NOT LOGGED!) This is because balance_node_right logs a move, but push_node_left explicitly doesn't. That is because logging the move would remove the overwritten src < dst range in the right eb, which was already logged when we called btrfs_tree_mod_log_eb_copy. The correct sequence would include a move from 456:988 to 0:532 after remove 0:455 and before removing 0:532. Reversing that sequence would entail creating keys for 0:532, then moving those keys out to 456:988, then creating more keys for 0:455. i.e., REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 532 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 531 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 530 ... REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 0 MOVE src slot 456 -> dst slot 0 nritems 533 REMOVE slot 455 REMOVE slot 454 REMOVE slot 453 ... REMOVE slot 0 ADD slot 455 ADD slot 454 ADD slot 453 ... ADD slot 0 MOVE src slot 0 -> dst slot 456 nritems 533 REMOVE slot 455 REMOVE slot 454 REMOVE slot 453 ... REMOVE slot 0 Fix this to log the move but avoid the double remove by putting all the logging logic in btrfs_tree_mod_log_eb_copy which has enough information to detect these cases and properly log moves, removes, and adds. Leave btrfs_tree_mod_log_insert_move to handle insert_ptr and delete_ptr's tree mod logging. (Un)fortunately, this is quite difficult to reproduce, and I was only able to reproduce it by adding sleeps in btrfs_search_old_slot that would encourage more log rewinding during ino_to_logical ioctls. I was able to hit the warning in the previous patch in the series without the fix quite quickly, but not after this patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: rename del_ptr to btrfs_del_ptr and export itJosef Bacik
This exists internal to ctree.c, however btrfs check needs to use it for some of its operations. I'd rather not duplicate that code inside of btrfs check as this is low level and I want to keep this code in one place, so rename the function to btrfs_del_ptr and export it so that it can be used inside of btrfs-progs safely. Add a comment to make sure this doesn't get removed by a future cleanup. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: add a btrfs_csum_type_size helperJosef Bacik
This is needed in btrfs-progs for the tools that convert the checksum types for file systems and a few other things. We don't have it in the kernel as we just want to get the size for the super blocks type. However I don't want to have to manually add this every time we sync ctree.c into btrfs-progs, so add the helper in the kernel with a note so it doesn't get removed by a later cleanup. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: remove level argument from btrfs_set_block_flagsJosef Bacik
We just pass in btrfs_header_level(eb) for the level, and we're passing in the eb already, so simply get the level from the eb inside of btrfs_set_block_flags. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: improve leaf dump and error handlingQu Wenruo
Improve the leaf dump behavior by: - Always dump the leaf first, then the error message - Output the slot number if possible Especially in __btrfs_free_extent() the leaf dump of extent tree can be pretty large. With an extra slot number it's much easier to locate the problem. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: print-tree: pass const extent buffer pointerQu Wenruo
Since print-tree infrastructure only prints the content of a tree block, we can make them to accept const extent buffer pointer. This removes a forced type convert in extent-tree, where we convert a const extent buffer pointer to regular one, just to avoid compiler warning. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: tag as unlikely the key comparison when checking sibling keysFilipe Manana
When checking siblings keys, before moving keys from one node/leaf to a sibling node/leaf, it's very unexpected to have the last key of the left sibling greater than or equals to the first key of the right sibling, as that means we have a (serious) corruption that breaks the key ordering properties of a b+tree. Since this is unexpected, surround the comparison with the unlikely macro, which helps the compiler generate better code for the most expected case (no existing b+tree corruption). This is also what we do for other unexpected cases of invalid key ordering (like at btrfs_set_item_key_safe()). Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: unexport btrfs_prev_leaf()Filipe Manana
btrfs_prev_leaf() is not used outside ctree.c, so there's no need to export it at ctree.h - just make it static at ctree.c and move its definition above btrfs_search_slot_for_read(), since that function calls it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-28btrfs: print extent buffers when sibling keys check failsFilipe Manana
When trying to move keys from one node/leaf to another sibling node/leaf, if the sibling keys check fails we just print an error message with the last key of the left sibling and the first key of the right sibling. However it's also useful to print all the keys of each sibling, as it may provide some clues to what went wrong, which code path may be inserting keys in an incorrect order. So just do that, print the siblings with btrfs_print_tree(), as it works for both leaves and nodes. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-28btrfs: abort transaction when sibling keys check fails for leavesFilipe Manana
If the sibling keys check fails before we move keys from one sibling leaf to another, we are not aborting the transaction - we leave that to some higher level caller of btrfs_search_slot() (or anything else that uses it to insert items into a b+tree). This means that the transaction abort will provide a stack trace that omits the b+tree modification call chain. So change this to immediately abort the transaction and therefore get a more useful stack trace that shows us the call chain in the bt+tree modification code. It's also important to immediately abort the transaction just in case some higher level caller is not doing it, as this indicates a very serious corruption and we should stop the possibility of doing further damage. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-28btrfs: fix btrfs_prev_leaf() to not return the same key twiceFilipe Manana
A call to btrfs_prev_leaf() may end up returning a path that points to the same item (key) again. This happens if while btrfs_prev_leaf(), after we release the path, a concurrent insertion happens, which moves items off from a sibling into the front of the previous leaf, and an item with the computed previous key does not exists. For example, suppose we have the two following leaves: Leaf A ------------------------------------------------------------- | ... key (300 96 10) key (300 96 15) key (300 96 16) | ------------------------------------------------------------- slot 20 slot 21 slot 22 Leaf B ------------------------------------------------------------- | key (300 96 20) key (300 96 21) key (300 96 22) ... | ------------------------------------------------------------- slot 0 slot 1 slot 2 If we call btrfs_prev_leaf(), from btrfs_previous_item() for example, with a path pointing to leaf B and slot 0 and the following happens: 1) At btrfs_prev_leaf() we compute the previous key to search as: (300 96 19), which is a key that does not exists in the tree; 2) Then we call btrfs_release_path() at btrfs_prev_leaf(); 3) Some other task inserts a key at leaf A, that sorts before the key at slot 20, for example it has an objectid of 299. In order to make room for the new key, the key at slot 22 is moved to the front of leaf B. This happens at push_leaf_right(), called from split_leaf(). After this leaf B now looks like: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | key (300 96 16) key (300 96 20) key (300 96 21) key (300 96 22) ... | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- slot 0 slot 1 slot 2 slot 3 4) At btrfs_prev_leaf() we call btrfs_search_slot() for the computed previous key: (300 96 19). Since the key does not exists, btrfs_search_slot() returns 1 and with a path pointing to leaf B and slot 1, the item with key (300 96 20); 5) This makes btrfs_prev_leaf() return a path that points to slot 1 of leaf B, the same key as before it was called, since the key at slot 0 of leaf B (300 96 16) is less than the computed previous key, which is (300 96 19); 6) As a consequence btrfs_previous_item() returns a path that points again to the item with key (300 96 20). For some users of btrfs_prev_leaf() or btrfs_previous_item() this may not be functional a problem, despite not making sense to return a new path pointing again to the same item/key. However for a caller such as tree-log.c:log_dir_items(), this has a bad consequence, as it can result in not logging some dir index deletions in case the directory is being logged without holding the inode's VFS lock (logging triggered while logging a child inode for example) - for the example scenario above, in case the dir index keys 17, 18 and 19 were deleted in the current transaction. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17btrfs: remove pointless loop at btrfs_get_next_valid_item()Filipe Manana
It's pointless to have a while loop at btrfs_get_next_valid_item(), as if the slot on the current leaf is beyond the last item, we call btrfs_next_leaf(), which leaves us at a valid slot of the next leaf (or a valid slot in the current leaf if after releasing the path an item gets pushed from the next leaf to the current leaf). So just call btrfs_next_leaf() if the current slot on the current leaf is beyond the last item. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>