summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jbd2
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-05jbd2: improve comments about freeing data buffers whose page mapping is NULLzhangyi (F)
Improve comments in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() to describe why we don't need to clear the buffer_mapped bit for freeing file mapping buffers whose page mapping is NULL. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200217112706.20085-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com Fixes: c96dceeabf76 ("jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer") Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-02-29jbd2: fix data races at struct journal_headQian Cai
journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, LTP: starting fsync04 /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2] write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70: __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2] __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2] (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034 kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2] kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2] jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155 jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2] __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4] ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe 5 locks held by fsync04/25724: #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260 #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4] #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4] #4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2] irq event stamp: 1407125 hardirqs last enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE(). Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043111.2227-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-02-21jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when clearing block group bitswangyan
I found a NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits(). The running environment: kernel version: 4.19 A cluster with two nodes, 5 luns mounted on two nodes, and do some file operations like dd/fallocate/truncate/rm on every lun with storage network disconnection. The fallocate operation on dm-23-45 caused an null pointer dereference. The information of NULL pointer dereference as follows: [577992.878282] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-23-45. [577992.878290] Aborting journal on device dm-23-45. ... [577992.890778] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-24-46. [577992.890908] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890916] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_extend_trans:474 ERROR: status = -30 [577992.890918] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890920] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_rotate_tree_right:2500 ERROR: status = -30 [577992.890922] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890924] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_do_insert_extent:4382 ERROR: status = -30 [577992.890928] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_insert_extent:4842 ERROR: status = -30 [577992.890928] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890930] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree:4947 ERROR: status = -30 [577992.890933] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890939] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data [577992.890949] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020 [577992.890950] Mem abort info: [577992.890951] ESR = 0x96000004 [577992.890952] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [577992.890952] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [577992.890953] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [577992.890954] Data abort info: [577992.890955] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [577992.890956] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [577992.890958] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000f8da07a9 [577992.890960] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000 [577992.890964] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [577992.890965] Process fallocate (pid: 88392, stack limit = 0x00000000013db2fd) [577992.890968] CPU: 52 PID: 88392 Comm: fallocate Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W OE 4.19.36 #1 [577992.890969] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDD, BIOS 0.98 08/25/2019 [577992.890971] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [577992.891054] pc : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2] [577992.891082] lr : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x618/0x968 [ocfs2] [577992.891084] sp : ffff0000c8e2b810 [577992.891085] x29: ffff0000c8e2b820 x28: 0000000000000000 [577992.891087] x27: 00000000000006f3 x26: ffffa07957b02e70 [577992.891089] x25: ffff807c59d50000 x24: 00000000000006f2 [577992.891091] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff807bd39abc30 [577992.891093] x21: ffff0000811d9000 x20: ffffa07535d6a000 [577992.891097] x19: ffff000001681638 x18: ffffffffffffffff [577992.891098] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff000080a03df0 [577992.891100] x15: ffff0000811d9708 x14: 203d207375746174 [577992.891101] x13: 73203a524f525245 x12: 20373439343a6565 [577992.891103] x11: 0000000000000038 x10: 0101010101010101 [577992.891106] x9 : ffffa07c68a85d70 x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f [577992.891109] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000080 [577992.891110] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000002 [577992.891112] x3 : ffff000001713390 x2 : 2ff90f88b1c22f00 [577992.891114] x1 : ffff807bd39abc30 x0 : 0000000000000000 [577992.891116] Call trace: [577992.891139] _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2] [577992.891162] _ocfs2_free_clusters+0x100/0x290 [ocfs2] [577992.891185] ocfs2_free_clusters+0x50/0x68 [ocfs2] [577992.891206] ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree+0x198/0x5e0 [ocfs2] [577992.891227] ocfs2_add_inode_data+0x94/0xc8 [ocfs2] [577992.891248] ocfs2_extend_allocation+0x1bc/0x7a8 [ocfs2] [577992.891269] ocfs2_allocate_extents+0x14c/0x338 [ocfs2] [577992.891290] __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x3f8/0x610 [ocfs2] [577992.891309] ocfs2_fallocate+0xe4/0x128 [ocfs2] [577992.891316] vfs_fallocate+0x11c/0x250 [577992.891317] ksys_fallocate+0x54/0x88 [577992.891319] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x28/0x38 [577992.891323] el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130 [577992.891325] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [577992.891327] el0_svc+0x8/0xc My analysis process as follows: ocfs2_fallocate __ocfs2_change_file_space ocfs2_allocate_extents ocfs2_extend_allocation ocfs2_add_inode_data ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree ocfs2_insert_extent ocfs2_do_insert_extent ocfs2_rotate_tree_right ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction ocfs2_extend_trans jbd2_journal_restart jbd2__journal_restart /* handle->h_transaction is NULL, * is_handle_aborted(handle) is true */ handle->h_transaction = NULL; start_this_handle return -EROFS; ocfs2_free_clusters _ocfs2_free_clusters _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits ocfs2_journal_access_gd __ocfs2_journal_access jbd2_journal_get_undo_access /* I think jbd2_write_access_granted() will * return true, because do_get_write_access() * will return -EROFS. */ if (jbd2_write_access_granted(...)) return 0; do_get_write_access /* handle->h_transaction is NULL, it will * return -EROFS here, so do_get_write_access() * was not called. */ if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -EROFS; /* bh2jh(group_bh) is NULL, caused NULL pointer dereference */ undo_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *) bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data; If handle->h_transaction == NULL, then jbd2_write_access_granted() does not really guarantee that journal_head will stay around, not even speaking of its b_committed_data. The bh2jh(group_bh) can be removed after ocfs2_journal_access_gd() and before call "bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data". So, we should move is_handle_aborted() check from do_get_write_access() into jbd2_journal_get_undo_access() and jbd2_journal_get_write_access() before the call to jbd2_write_access_granted(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f72a623f-b3f1-381a-d91d-d22a1c83a336@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2020-02-16Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o: "Miscellaneous ext4 bug fixes (all stable fodder)" * tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: ext4: improve explanation of a mount failure caused by a misconfigured kernel jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer() ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode ext4: fix checksum errors with indexed dirs ext4: fix support for inode sizes > 1024 bytes ext4: simplify checking quota limits in ext4_statfs() ext4: don't assume that mmp_nodename/bdevname have NUL
2020-02-13jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata bufferzhangyi (F)
Commit 904cdbd41d74 ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction") set the BH_Freed flag when forgetting a metadata buffer which belongs to the committing transaction, it indicate the committing process clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer. But it also clear the BH_Mapped flag at the same time, which may trigger below NULL pointer oops when block_size < PAGE_SIZE. rmdir 1 kjournald2 mkdir 2 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction commit transaction N jbd2_journal_forget set_buffer_freed(bh1) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction commit transaction N+1 ... clear_buffer_mapped(bh1) ext4_getblk(bh2 ummapped) ... grow_dev_page init_page_buffers bh1->b_private=NULL bh2->b_private=NULL jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh1) __journal_remove_journal_head(hb1) jh1 is NULL and trigger oops *) Dir entry block bh1 and bh2 belongs to one page, and the bh2 has already been unmapped. For the metadata buffer we forgetting, we should always keep the mapped flag and clear the dirty flags is enough, so this patch pick out the these buffers and keep their BH_Mapped flag. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213063821.30455-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com Fixes: 904cdbd41d74 ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction") Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2020-02-13jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer()zhangyi (F)
There is no need to delay the clearing of b_modified flag to the transaction committing time when unmapping the journalled buffer, so just move it to the journal_unmap_buffer(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213063821.30455-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2020-02-08Merge branch 'work.misc' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs Pull misc vfs updates from Al Viro: - bmap series from cmaiolino - getting rid of convolutions in copy_mount_options() (use a couple of copy_from_user() instead of the __get_user() crap) * 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: saner copy_mount_options() fibmap: Reject negative block numbers fibmap: Use bmap instead of ->bmap method in ioctl_fibmap ecryptfs: drop direct calls to ->bmap cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method. fs: Enable bmap() function to properly return errors
2020-02-04proc: convert everything to "struct proc_ops"Alexey Dobriyan
The most notable change is DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro split in seq_file.h. Conversion rule is: llseek => proc_lseek unlocked_ioctl => proc_ioctl xxx => proc_xxx delete ".owner = THIS_MODULE" line [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi_proc.c] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix kernel/sched/psi.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200122180545.36222f50@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191225172546.GB13378@avx2 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-02-03fs: Enable bmap() function to properly return errorsCarlos Maiolino
By now, bmap() will either return the physical block number related to the requested file offset or 0 in case of error or the requested offset maps into a hole. This patch makes the needed changes to enable bmap() to proper return errors, using the return value as an error return, and now, a pointer must be passed to bmap() to be filled with the mapped physical block. It will change the behavior of bmap() on return: - negative value in case of error - zero on success or map fell into a hole In case of a hole, the *block will be zero too Since this is a prep patch, by now, the only error return is -EINVAL if ->bmap doesn't exist. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-01-25jbd2: clean __jbd2_journal_abort_hard() and __journal_abort_soft()zhangyi (F)
__jbd2_journal_abort_hard() is no longer used, so now we can merge __jbd2_journal_abort_hard() and __journal_abort_soft() these two functions into jbd2_journal_abort() and remove them. Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204124614.45424-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25jbd2: make sure ESHUTDOWN to be recorded in the journal superblockzhangyi (F)
Commit fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer") want to allow jbd2 layer to distinguish shutdown journal abort from other error cases. So the ESHUTDOWN should be taken precedence over any other errno which has already been recoded after EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN is set, but it only update errno in the journal suoerblock now if the old errno is 0. Fixes: fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer") Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204124614.45424-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25ext4, jbd2: ensure panic when aborting with zero errnozhangyi (F)
JBD2_REC_ERR flag used to indicate the errno has been updated when jbd2 aborted, and then __ext4_abort() and ext4_handle_error() can invoke panic if ERRORS_PANIC is specified. But if the journal has been aborted with zero errno, jbd2_journal_abort() didn't set this flag so we can no longer panic. Fix this by always record the proper errno in the journal superblock. Fixes: 4327ba52afd03 ("ext4, jbd2: ensure entering into panic after recording an error in superblock") Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204124614.45424-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25jbd2: switch to use jbd2_journal_abort() when failed to submit the commit recordzhangyi (F)
We invoke jbd2_journal_abort() to abort the journal and record errno in the jbd2 superblock when committing journal transaction besides the failure on submitting the commit record. But there is no need for the case and we can also invoke jbd2_journal_abort() instead of __jbd2_journal_abort_hard(). Fixes: 818d276ceb83a ("ext4: Add the journal checksum feature") Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204124614.45424-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25jbd2_seq_info_next should increase position indexVasily Averin
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index, read after some lseek can generate unexpected output. Script below generates endless output $ q=;while read -r r;do echo "$((++q)) $r";done </proc/fs/jbd2/DEV/info https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 Fixes: 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and interface") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d13805e5-695e-8ac3-b678-26ca2313629f@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25jbd2: remove pointless assertion in __journal_remove_journal_headShijie Luo
Only when jh->b_jcount = 0 in jbd2_journal_put_journal_head, we are allowed to call __journal_remove_journal_head. This assertion is meaningless, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200123070054.50585-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25ext4,jbd2: fix comment and code styleShijie Luo
Fix comment and remove unneccessary blank. Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200123064325.36358-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-25jbd2: delete the duplicated words in the commentswangyan
Delete the duplicated words "is" in the comments Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12087f77-ab4d-c7ba-53b4-893dbf0026f0@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2020-01-17jbd2: clear JBD2_ABORT flag before journal_reset to update log tail info ↵Kai Li
when load journal If the journal is dirty when the filesystem is mounted, jbd2 will replay the journal but the journal superblock will not be updated by journal_reset() because JBD2_ABORT flag is still set (it was set in journal_init_common()). This is problematic because when a new transaction is then committed, it will be recorded in block 1 (journal->j_tail was set to 1 in journal_reset()). If unclean shutdown happens again before the journal superblock is updated, the new recorded transaction will not be replayed during the next mount (because of stale sb->s_start and sb->s_sequence values) which can lead to filesystem corruption. Fixes: 85e0c4e89c1b ("jbd2: if the journal is aborted then don't allow update of the log tail") Signed-off-by: Kai Li <li.kai4@h3c.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200111022542.5008-1-li.kai4@h3c.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-30Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "This merge window saw the the following new featuers added to ext4: - Direct I/O via iomap (required the iomap-for-next branch from Darrick as a prereq). - Support for using dioread-nolock where the block size < page size. - Support for encryption for file systems where the block size < page size. - Rework of journal credits handling so a revoke-heavy workload will not cause the journal to run out of space. - Replace bit-spinlocks with spinlocks in jbd2 Also included were some bug fixes and cleanups, mostly to clean up corner cases from fuzzed file systems and error path handling" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (59 commits) ext4: work around deleting a file with i_nlink == 0 safely ext4: add more paranoia checking in ext4_expand_extra_isize handling jbd2: make jbd2_handle_buffer_credits() handle reserved handles ext4: fix a bug in ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit ext4: bio_alloc with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM never fails ext4: code cleanup for get_next_id ext4: fix leak of quota reservations ext4: remove unused variable warning in parse_options() ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks fs/buffer.c: support fscrypt in block_read_full_page() ext4: Add error handling for io_end_vec struct allocation jbd2: Fine tune estimate of necessary descriptor blocks jbd2: Provide trace event for handle restarts ext4: Reserve revoke credits for freed blocks jbd2: Make credit checking more strict jbd2: Rename h_buffer_credits to h_total_credits jbd2: Reserve space for revoke descriptor blocks jbd2: Drop jbd2_space_needed() jbd2: Account descriptor blocks into t_outstanding_credits jbd2: Factor out common parts of stopping and restarting a handle ...
2019-11-05Merge branch 'jk/jbd2-revoke-overflow'Theodore Ts'o
2019-11-05jbd2: Fine tune estimate of necessary descriptor blocksJan Kara
Currently we reserve j_max_transaction_buffers / 32 for transaction descriptor blocks. Now that revoke descriptors are accounted for separately this estimate is unnecessarily high and we can actually compute much tighter estimate. In the common case of 32k journal blocks and 4k blocksize this actually reduces the amount of reserved descriptor blocks from 256 to ~25 which allows us to fit more real data into a transaction. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-25-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Provide trace event for handle restartsJan Kara
Provide trace event for handle restarts to ease debugging. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-24-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Make credit checking more strictJan Kara
Make checking of available credits in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() more strict. There should be always enough credits in the handle to write all potential revoke descriptors. Also we warn in case there are not enough credits since this is a bug in the filesystem. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-22-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Rename h_buffer_credits to h_total_creditsJan Kara
The credit counter now contains both buffer and revoke descriptor block credits. Rename to counter to h_total_credits to reflect that. No functional change. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-21-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Reserve space for revoke descriptor blocksJan Kara
Extend functions for starting, extending, and restarting transaction handles to take number of revoke records handle must be able to accommodate. These functions then make sure transaction has enough credits to be able to store resulting revoke descriptor blocks. Also revoke code tracks number of revoke records created by a handle to catch situation where some place didn't reserve enough space for revoke records. Similarly to standard transaction credits, space for unused reserved revoke records is released when the handle is stopped. On the ext4 side we currently take a simplistic approach of reserving space for 1024 revoke records for any transaction. This grows amount of credits reserved for each handle only by a few and is enough for any normal workload so that we don't hit warnings in jbd2. We will refine the logic in following commits. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-20-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Drop jbd2_space_needed()Jan Kara
The function is now just a trivial wrapper returning journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. Drop it. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-19-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Account descriptor blocks into t_outstanding_creditsJan Kara
Currently, journal descriptor blocks were not accounted in transaction->t_outstanding_credits and we were just leaving some slack space in the journal for them (in jbd2_log_space_left() and jbd2_space_needed()). This is making proper accounting (and reservation we want to add) of descriptor blocks difficult so switch to accounting descriptor blocks in transaction->t_outstanding_credits and just reserve the same amount of credits in t_outstanding credits for journal descriptor blocks when creating transaction. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-18-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Factor out common parts of stopping and restarting a handleJan Kara
jbd2__journal_restart() has quite some code that is common with jbd2_journal_stop(). Factor this functionality into stop_this_handle() helper and use it from both functions. Note that this also drops t_handle_lock protection from jbd2__journal_restart() as jbd2_journal_stop() does the same thing without it. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-17-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Drop pointless wakeup from jbd2_journal_stop()Jan Kara
When we drop last handle from a transaction and journal->j_barrier_count > 0, jbd2_journal_stop() wakes up journal->j_wait_transaction_locked wait queue. This looks pointless - wait for outstanding handles always happens on journal->j_wait_updates waitqueue. journal->j_wait_transaction_locked is used to wait for transaction state changes and by start_this_handle() for waiting until journal->j_barrier_count drops to 0. The first case is clearly irrelevant here since only jbd2 thread changes transaction state. The second case looks related but jbd2_journal_unlock_updates() is responsible for the wakeup in this case. So just drop the wakeup. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-16-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Drop pointless check from jbd2_journal_stop()Jan Kara
If a transaction is larger than journal->j_max_transaction_buffers, that is a bug and not a trigger for transaction commit. Also the very next attempt to start new handle will start transaction commit anyway. So just remove the pointless check. Arguably, we could start transaction commit whenever the transaction size is *close* to journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. This has a potential to reduce latency of the next jbd2_journal_start() at the cost of somewhat smaller transactions. However for this to have any effect, it would mean that there isn't someone already waiting in jbd2_journal_start() which means metadata load for the fs is pretty light anyway so probably this optimization is not worth it. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-15-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Reorganize jbd2_journal_stop()Jan Kara
Move code in jbd2_journal_stop() around a bit. It removes some unnecessary code duplication and will make factoring out parts common with jbd2__journal_restart() easier. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-14-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Fix statistics for the number of logged blocksJan Kara
jbd2 statistics counting number of blocks logged in a transaction was wrong. It didn't count the commit block and more importantly it didn't count revoke descriptor blocks. Make sure these get properly counted. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-13-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Completely fill journal descriptor blocksJan Kara
With 32-bit block numbers, we don't allocate the array for journal buffer heads large enough for corresponding descriptor tags to fill the descriptor block. Thus we end up writing out half-full descriptor blocks to the journal unnecessarily growing the transaction. Fix the logic to allocate the array large enough. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-11-05jbd2: Fixup stale comment in commit codeJan Kara
jbd2_journal_next_log_block() does not look at transaction->t_outstanding_credits. Remove the misleading comment. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Free journal head outside of locked regionThomas Gleixner
On PREEMPT_RT bit-spinlocks have the same semantics as on PREEMPT_RT=n, i.e. they disable preemption. That means functions which are not safe to be called in preempt disabled context on RT trigger a might_sleep() assert. The journal head bit spinlock is mostly held for short code sequences with trivial RT safe functionality, except for one place: jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() invokes __journal_remove_journal_head() with the journal head bit spinlock held. __journal_remove_journal_head() invokes kmem_cache_free() which must not be called with preemption disabled on RT. Jan suggested to rework the removal function so the actual free happens outside the bit-spinlocked region. Split it into two parts: - Do the sanity checks and the buffer head detach under the lock - Do the actual free after dropping the lock There is error case handling in the free part which needs to dereference the b_size field of the now detached buffer head. Due to paranoia (caused by ignorance) the size is retrieved in the detach function and handed into the free function. Might be over-engineered, but better safe than sorry. This makes the journal head bit-spinlock usage RT compliant and also avoids nested locking which is not covered by lockdep. Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-8-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Make state lock a spinlockThomas Gleixner
Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT. A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS. Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock to a spinlock unconditionally. Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit). The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state() inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer which adds another level of indirection. As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites. Fixup all locking comments as well. Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Don't call __bforget() unnecessarilyJan Kara
jbd2_journal_forget() jumps to 'not_jbd' branch which calls __bforget() in cases where the buffer is clean which is pointless. In case of failed assertion, it can be even argued that it is safer not to touch buffer's dirty bits. Also logically it makes more sense to just jump to 'drop' and that will make logic also simpler when we switch bh_state_lock to a spinlock. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-6-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Drop unnecessary branch from jbd2_journal_forget()Jan Kara
We have cleared both dirty & jbddirty bits from the bh. So there's no difference between bforget() and brelse(). Thus there's no point jumping to no_jbd branch. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-5-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Move dropping of jh reference out of un/re-filing functionsJan Kara
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() drop transaction's jh reference when they remove jh from a transaction. This will be however inconvenient once we move state lock into journal_head itself as we still need to unlock it and we'd need to grab jh reference just for that. Move dropping of jh reference out of these functions into the few callers. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-21jbd2: Simplify journal_unmap_buffer()Thomas Gleixner
journal_unmap_buffer() checks first whether the buffer head is a journal. If so it takes locks and then invokes jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head() followed by another check whether this is journal head buffer. The double checking is pointless. Replace the initial check with jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head() which alredy checks whether the buffer head is actually a journal. Allows also early access to the journal head pointer for the upcoming conversion of state lock to a regular spinlock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-10-09locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()Qian Cai
Since the following commit: b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release") @nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all lock_release() calls and friends. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: airlied@linux.ie Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: jack@suse.com Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Cc: jslaby@suse.com Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: mark@fasheh.com Cc: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: mripard@kernel.org Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Cc: sean@poorly.run Cc: st@kernel.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tytso@mit.edu Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-09-24jbd2: remove jbd2_journal_inode_add_[write|wait]Joseph Qi
Since ext4/ocfs2 are using jbd2_inode dirty range scoping APIs now, jbd2_journal_inode_add_[write|wait] are not used any more, remove them. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562977611-8412-2-git-send-email-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Acked-by: Changwei Ge <chge@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-08-24jbd2: add missing tracepoint for reserved handleXiaoguang Wang
This issue was found when I use ebpf to trace every jbd2 handle's running info in dioread_nolock case. Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11jbd2: flush_descriptor(): Do not decrease buffer head's ref countChandan Rajendra
When executing generic/388 on a ppc64le machine, we notice the following call trace, VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6637 at /root/repos/linux/fs/buffer.c:1195 __brelse+0x84/0xc0 Call Trace: __brelse+0x80/0xc0 (unreliable) invalidate_bh_lru+0x78/0xc0 on_each_cpu_mask+0xa8/0x130 on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x130/0x170 invalidate_bh_lrus+0x44/0x60 invalidate_bdev+0x38/0x70 ext4_put_super+0x294/0x560 generic_shutdown_super+0xb0/0x170 kill_block_super+0x38/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xa4/0xf0 cleanup_mnt+0x164/0x1d0 task_work_run+0x110/0x160 do_notify_resume+0x414/0x460 ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74 The warning happens because flush_descriptor() drops bh reference it does not own. The bh reference acquired by jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer() is owned by the log_bufs list and gets released when this list is processed. The reference for doing IO is only acquired in write_dirty_buffer() later in flush_descriptor(). Reported-by: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-06-20jbd2: drop declaration of journal_sync_buffer()Theodore Ts'o
The journal_sync_buffer() function was never carried over from jbd to jbd2. So get rid of the vestigal declaration of this (non-existent) function. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
2019-06-20jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scopingRoss Zwisler
Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry. The consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the pages under writeback to be written out. The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from /dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem. This can cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of the entire dd operation. We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges associated with a given transaction. We do this via the jbd2_inode structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure. This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode in question is still being appended to. Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2019-05-30jbd2: fix typo in comment of journal_submit_inode_data_buffersLiu Song
delayed/dealyed Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-05-30jbd2: fix some print format mistakesGaowei Pu
There are some print format mistakes in debug messages. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Gaowei Pu <pugaowei@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2019-05-21treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/KconfigThomas Gleixner
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which: - Have no license information of any form These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-10jbd2: fix potential double freeChengguang Xu
When failing from creating cache jbd2_inode_cache, we will destroy the previously created cache jbd2_handle_cache twice. This patch fixes this by moving each cache initialization/destruction to its own separate, individual function. Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org