| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As part of testing log recovery with dm_log_writes, Amir Goldstein
discovered an error in the deferred ops recovery that lead to corruption
of the filesystem metadata if a reflink+rmap filesystem happened to shut
down midway through a CoW remap:
"This is what happens [after failed log recovery]:
"Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
"Phase 2 - using internal log
" - zero log...
" - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
" - found root inode chunk
"Phase 3 - for each AG...
" - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
" - process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
" - agno = 0
"data fork in regular inode 134 claims CoW block 376
"correcting nextents for inode 134
"bad data fork in inode 134
"would have cleared inode 134"
Hou Tao dissected the log contents of exactly such a crash:
"According to the implementation of xfs_defer_finish(), these ops should
be completed in the following sequence:
"Have been done:
"(1) CUI: Oper (160)
"(2) BUI: Oper (161)
"(3) CUD: Oper (194), for CUI Oper (160)
"(4) RUI A: Oper (197), free rmap [0x155, 2, -9]
"Should be done:
"(5) BUD: for BUI Oper (161)
"(6) RUI B: add rmap [0x155, 2, 137]
"(7) RUD: for RUI A
"(8) RUD: for RUI B
"Actually be done by xlog_recover_process_intents()
"(5) BUD: for BUI Oper (161)
"(6) RUI B: add rmap [0x155, 2, 137]
"(7) RUD: for RUI B
"(8) RUD: for RUI A
"So the rmap entry [0x155, 2, -9] for COW should be freed firstly,
then a new rmap entry [0x155, 2, 137] will be added. However, as we can see
from the log record in post_mount.log (generated after umount) and the trace
print, the new rmap entry [0x155, 2, 137] are added firstly, then the rmap
entry [0x155, 2, -9] are freed."
When reconstructing the internal log state from the log items found on
disk, it's required that deferred ops replay in exactly the same order
that they would have had the filesystem not gone down. However,
replaying unfinished deferred ops can create /more/ deferred ops. These
new deferred ops are finished in the wrong order. This causes fs
corruption and replay crashes, so let's create a single defer_ops to
handle the subsequent ops created during replay, then use one single
transaction at the end of log recovery to ensure that everything is
replayed in the same order as they're supposed to be.
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Analyzed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
|
|
And instead require callers to explicitly join the inode using
xfs_defer_ijoin. Also consolidate the defer error handling in
a few places using a goto label.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
|
|
shared extent
In a pathological scenario where we are trying to bunmapi a single
extent in which every other block is shared, it's possible that trying
to unmap the entire large extent in a single transaction can generate so
many EFIs that we overflow the transaction reservation.
Therefore, use a heuristic to guess at the number of blocks we can
safely unmap from a reflink file's data fork in an single transaction.
This should prevent problems such as the log head slamming into the tail
and ASSERTs that trigger because we've exceeded the transaction
reservation.
Note that since bunmapi can fail to unmap the entire range, we must also
teach the deferred unmap code to roll into a new transaction whenever we
get low on reservation.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
[hch: random edits, all bugs are my fault]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
In xfs_reflink_end_cow, we erroneously reserve only enough blocks to
handle adding 1 extent. This is problematic if we fragment free space,
have to do CoW, and then have to perform multiple bmap btree expansions.
Furthermore, the BUI recovery routine doesn't reserve /any/ blocks to
handle btree splits, so log recovery fails after our first error causes
the filesystem to go down.
Therefore, refactor the transaction block reservation macros until we
have a macro that works for our deferred (re)mapping activities, and fix
both problems by using that macro.
With 1k blocks we can hit this fairly often in g/187 if the scratch fs
is big enough.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Use ASSERTs on the log intent item refcounts so that we fail noisily if
anyone tries to double-free the item.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Log recovery will iget an inode to replay BUI items and iput the inode
when it's done. Unfortunately, if the inode was unlinked, the iput
will see that i_nlink == 0 and decide to truncate & free the inode,
which prevents us from replaying subsequent BUIs. We can't skip the
BUIs because we have to replay all the redo items to ensure that
atomic operations complete.
Since unlinked inode recovery will reap the inode anyway, we can
safely introduce a new inode flag to indicate that an inode is in this
'unlinked recovery' state and should not be auto-reaped in the
drop_inode path.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Implement deferred versions of the inode block map/unmap functions.
These will be used in subsequent patches to make reflink operations
atomic.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Provide a mechanism for higher levels to create BUI/BUD items, submit
them to the log, and a stub function to deal with recovered BUI items.
These parts will be connected to the rmapbt in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Create bmbt update intent/done log items to record redo information in
the log. Because we roll transactions multiple times for reflink
operations, we also have to track the status of the metadata updates
that will be recorded in the post-roll transactions in case we crash
before committing the final transaction. This mechanism enables log
recovery to finish what was already started.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
