summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/asm-x86_64/swiotlb.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-03-06Revert "[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)"Tony Luck
This reverts commit 51099005ab8e09d68a13fea8d55bc739c1040ca6.
2007-02-05[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)Jan Beulich
Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments other than IA64 and EM64T, namely for Xen. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2007-02-05[IA64] swiotlb bug fixesJan Beulich
This patch fixes - marking I-cache clean of pages DMAed to now only done for IA64 - broken multiple inclusion in include/asm-x86_64/swiotlb.h - missing call to mark_clean in swiotlb_sync_sg() - a (perhaps only theoretical) issue in swiotlb_dma_supported() when io_tlb_end is exactly at the end of memory Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2006-07-29[PATCH] x86_64: Fix swiotlb=forceAndi Kleen
It was broken before. But having it is important as possible hardware bug workaround. And previously there was no way to force swiotlb if there is another IOMMU. Side effect is that iommu=force won't force swiotlb anymore even if there isn't another IOMMU. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-04-26Don't include linux/config.h from anywhere else in include/David Woodhouse
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-01-11[PATCH] x86_64: Use function pointers to call DMA mapping functionsMuli Ben-Yehuda
AK: I hacked Muli's original patch a lot and there were a lot of changes - all bugs are probably to blame on me now. There were also some changes in the fall back behaviour for swiotlb - in particular it doesn't try to use GFP_DMA now anymore. Also all DMA mapping operations use the same core dma_alloc_coherent code with proper fallbacks now. And various other changes and cleanups. Known problems: iommu=force swiotlb=force together breaks needs more testing. This patch cleans up x86_64's DMA mapping dispatching code. Right now we have three possible IOMMU types: AGP GART, swiotlb and nommu, and in the future we will also have Xen's x86_64 swiotlb and other HW IOMMUs for x86_64. In order to support all of them cleanly, this patch: - introduces a struct dma_mapping_ops with function pointers for each of the DMA mapping operations of gart (AMD HW IOMMU), swiotlb (software IOMMU) and nommu (no IOMMU). - gets rid of: if (swiotlb) return swiotlb_xxx(); - PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS is now checked against the dma_ops being set This makes swiotlb faster by avoiding double copying in some cases. Signed-Off-By: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org> Signed-Off-By: Jon D. Mason <jdmason@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-31manual update from upstream:Tony Luck
Applied Al's change 06a544971fad0992fe8b92c5647538d573089dd4 to new location of swiotlb.c Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2005-10-28[PATCH] gfp_t: dma-mapping (ia64)Al Viro
... and related annotations for amd64 - swiotlb code is shared, but prototypes are not. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-29[PATCH] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappingsJohn W. Linville
This patch implements swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device}. This is intended to support an x86_64 implementation of dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device}. Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!