| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
can_rx_offload_queue_tail()
This function has nothing todo with error.
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
|
|
can_rx_offload_queue_sorted() functions
Current CAN framework can't guarantee proper/chronological order
of RX and TX-ECHO messages. To make this possible, drivers should use
this functions instead of can_get_echo_skb().
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
|
|
Some CAN controllers don't implement a FIFO in hardware, but fill their
mailboxes in a particular order (from lowest to highest or highest to lowest).
This makes problems to read the frames in the correct order from the hardware,
as new frames might be filled into just read (low) mailboxes. This gets worse,
when following new frames are received into not read (higher) mailboxes.
On the bright side some these CAN controllers put a timestamp on each received
CAN frame. This patch adds support to offload CAN frames in interrupt context,
order them by timestamp and then transmitted in a NAPI context.
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
|
|
Some CAN controllers have a usable FIFO already but can still benefit
from off-loading the CAN controller FIFO. The CAN frames of the FIFO are
read and put into a skb queue during interrupt and then transmitted in a
NAPI context.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
|
