summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/time64.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-08-31time: Avoid undefined behaviour in timespec64_add_safe()Vegard Nossum
I ran into this: ================================================================================ UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/time/time.c:783:2 signed integer overflow: 5273 + 9223372036854771711 cannot be represented in type 'long int' CPU: 0 PID: 17363 Comm: trinity-c0 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc1+ #88 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.3-0-ge2fc41e-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 0000000000000000 ffff88011457f8f0 ffffffff82344f50 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff84f98080 ffffffff82344ea4 ffff88011457f918 ffff88011457f8c8 ffff88011457f8e0 7fffffffffffefff ffff88011457f6d8 dffffc0000000000 Call Trace: [<ffffffff82344f50>] dump_stack+0xac/0xfc [<ffffffff82344ea4>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0xc4/0xc4 [<ffffffff8242f4c8>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x8a [<ffffffff8242fc04>] handle_overflow+0x202/0x23d [<ffffffff8242fa02>] ? val_to_string.constprop.6+0x11e/0x11e [<ffffffff823c7837>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [<ffffffff8131b581>] ? __sigqueue_free.part.13+0x51/0x70 [<ffffffff8146d4e0>] ? rcu_is_watching+0x110/0x110 [<ffffffff8242fc4d>] __ubsan_handle_add_overflow+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff81476ef8>] timespec64_add_safe+0x298/0x340 [<ffffffff81476c60>] ? timespec_add_safe+0x330/0x330 [<ffffffff812f7990>] ? wait_noreap_copyout+0x1d0/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8184bf18>] poll_select_set_timeout+0xf8/0x170 [<ffffffff8184be20>] ? poll_schedule_timeout+0x2b0/0x2b0 [<ffffffff813aa9bb>] ? __might_sleep+0x5b/0x260 [<ffffffff833c8a87>] __sys_recvmmsg+0x107/0x790 [<ffffffff833c8980>] ? SyS_recvmsg+0x20/0x20 [<ffffffff81486378>] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x3b8/0x1380 [<ffffffff845f8bfb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x60 [<ffffffff8148bcea>] ? do_setitimer+0x39a/0x8e0 [<ffffffff813aa9bb>] ? __might_sleep+0x5b/0x260 [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790 [<ffffffff833c91e9>] SyS_recvmmsg+0xd9/0x160 [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790 [<ffffffff823c7853>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffff8162f680>] ? __context_tracking_exit.part.3+0x30/0x1b0 [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790 [<ffffffff81007bd3>] do_syscall_64+0x1b3/0x4b0 [<ffffffff845f936a>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 ================================================================================ Line 783 is this: 783 set_normalized_timespec64(&res, lhs.tv_sec + rhs.tv_sec, 784 lhs.tv_nsec + rhs.tv_nsec); In other words, since lhs.tv_sec and rhs.tv_sec are both time64_t, this is a signed addition which will cause undefined behaviour on overflow. Note that this is not currently a huge concern since the kernel should be built with -fno-strict-overflow by default, but could be a problem in the future, a problem with older compilers, or other compilers than gcc. The easiest way to avoid the overflow is to cast one of the arguments to unsigned (so the addition will be done using unsigned arithmetic). Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2016-05-19time: remove timespec_add_safe()Deepa Dinamani
All references to timespec_add_safe() now use timespec64_add_safe(). The plan is to replace struct timespec references with struct timespec64 throughout the kernel as timespec is not y2038 safe. Drop timespec_add_safe() and use timespec64_add_safe() for all architectures. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461947989-21926-4-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19time: add missing implementation for timespec64_add_safe()Deepa Dinamani
timespec64_add_safe() has been defined in time64.h for 64 bit systems. But, 32 bit systems only have an extern function prototype defined. Provide a definition for the above function. The function will be necessary as part of y2038 changes. struct timespec is not y2038 safe. All references to timespec will be replaced by struct timespec64. The function is meant to be a replacement for timespec_add_safe(). The implementation is similar to timespec_add_safe(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461947989-21926-2-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-08-17time: Introduce struct itimerspec64Baolin Wang
The struct itimerspec is not year 2038 safe on 32bit systems due to the limitation of the struct timespec members. Introduce itimerspec64 which uses struct timespec64 instead and provide conversion functions. Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2015-06-12time: Prevent early expiry of hrtimers[CLOCK_REALTIME] at the leap second edgeJohn Stultz
Currently, leapsecond adjustments are done at tick time. As a result, the leapsecond was applied at the first timer tick *after* the leapsecond (~1-10ms late depending on HZ), rather then exactly on the second edge. This was in part historical from back when we were always tick based, but correcting this since has been avoided since it adds extra conditional checks in the gettime fastpath, which has performance overhead. However, it was recently pointed out that ABS_TIME CLOCK_REALTIME timers set for right after the leapsecond could fire a second early, since some timers may be expired before we trigger the timekeeping timer, which then applies the leapsecond. This isn't quite as bad as it sounds, since behaviorally it is similar to what is possible w/ ntpd made leapsecond adjustments done w/o using the kernel discipline. Where due to latencies, timers may fire just prior to the settimeofday call. (Also, one should note that all applications using CLOCK_REALTIME timers should always be careful, since they are prone to quirks from settimeofday() disturbances.) However, the purpose of having the kernel do the leap adjustment is to avoid such latencies, so I think this is worth fixing. So in order to properly keep those timers from firing a second early, this patch modifies the ntp and timekeeping logic so that we keep enough state so that the update_base_offsets_now accessor, which provides the hrtimer core the current time, can check and apply the leapsecond adjustment on the second edge. This prevents the hrtimer core from expiring timers too early. This patch does not modify any other time read path, so no additional overhead is incurred. However, this also means that the leap-second continues to be applied at tick time for all other read-paths. Apologies to Richard Cochran, who pushed for similar changes years ago, which I resisted due to the concerns about the performance overhead. While I suspect this isn't extremely critical, folks who care about strict leap-second correctness will likely want to watch this. Potentially a -stable candidate eventually. Originally-suggested-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434063297-28657-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-05-22time: Include math64.h in time64.hXunlei Pang
On 32-bit systems, timespec64_add_ns() calls __iter_div_u64_rem() which needs math64.h, and we want to include time64.h in some cases. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2014-07-23time: More core infrastructure for timespec64John Stultz
Helper and conversion functions for timespec64. Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2014-07-23time64: Add time64.h header and define struct timespec64John Stultz
Define the timespec64 structure and standard helper functions. [ tglx: Make it 32bit only. 64bit really can map timespec to timespec64 ] Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>