| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When an SVSM is present, the guest can also request attestation reports
from it. These SVSM attestation reports can be used to attest the SVSM
and any services running within the SVSM.
Extend the config-fs attestation support to provide such. This involves
creating four new config-fs attributes:
- 'service-provider' (input)
This attribute is used to determine whether the attestation request
should be sent to the specified service provider or to the SEV
firmware. The SVSM service provider is represented by the value
'svsm'.
- 'service_guid' (input)
Used for requesting the attestation of a single service within the
service provider. A null GUID implies that the SVSM_ATTEST_SERVICES
call should be used to request the attestation report. A non-null
GUID implies that the SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE call should be used.
- 'service_manifest_version' (input)
Used with the SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE call, the service version
represents a specific service manifest version be used for the
attestation report.
- 'manifestblob' (output)
Used to return the service manifest associated with the attestation
report.
Only display these new attributes when running under an SVSM.
[ bp: Massage.
- s/svsm_attestation_call/svsm_attest_call/g ]
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/965015dce3c76bb8724839d50c5dea4e4b5d598f.1717600736.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
|
|
The TSM attestation report support provides multiple configfs attribute
types (both for standard and binary attributes) to allow for additional
attributes to be displayed for SNP as compared to TDX. With the ability
to hide attributes via configfs, consolidate the multiple attribute groups
into a single standard attribute group and a single binary attribute
group. Modify the TDX support to hide the attributes that were previously
"hidden" as a result of registering the selective attribute groups.
Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8873c45d0c8abc35aaf01d7833a55788a6905727.1717600736.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
|
|
With the introduction of an SVSM, Linux will be running at a non-zero
VMPL. Any request for an attestation report at a higher privilege VMPL
than what Linux is currently running will result in an error. Allow for
the privlevel_floor attribute to be updated dynamically.
[ bp: Trim commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a736be9384aebd98a0b7c929660f8a97cbdc366.1717600736.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
|
|
One of the common operations of a TSM (Trusted Security Module) is to
provide a way for a TVM (confidential computing guest execution
environment) to take a measurement of its launch state, sign it and
submit it to a verifying party. Upon successful attestation that
verifies the integrity of the TVM additional secrets may be deployed.
The concept is common across TSMs, but the implementations are
unfortunately vendor specific. While the industry grapples with a common
definition of this attestation format [1], Linux need not make this
problem worse by defining a new ABI per TSM that wants to perform a
similar operation. The current momentum has been to invent new ioctl-ABI
per TSM per function which at best is an abdication of the kernel's
responsibility to make common infrastructure concepts share common ABI.
The proposal, targeted to conceptually work with TDX, SEV-SNP, COVE if
not more, is to define a configfs interface to retrieve the TSM-specific
blob.
report=/sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/report0
mkdir $report
dd if=binary_userdata_plus_nonce > $report/inblob
hexdump $report/outblob
This approach later allows for the standardization of the attestation
blob format without needing to invent a new ABI. Once standardization
happens the standard format can be emitted by $report/outblob and
indicated by $report/provider, or a new attribute like
"$report/tcg_coco_report" can emit the standard format alongside the
vendor format.
Review of previous iterations of this interface identified that there is
a need to scale report generation for multiple container environments
[2]. Configfs enables a model where each container can bind mount one or
more report generation item instances. Still, within a container only a
single thread can be manipulating a given configuration instance at a
time. A 'generation' count is provided to detect conflicts between
multiple threads racing to configure a report instance.
The SEV-SNP concepts of "extended reports" and "privilege levels" are
optionally enabled by selecting 'tsm_report_ext_type' at register_tsm()
time. The expectation is that those concepts are generic enough that
they may be adopted by other TSM implementations. In other words,
configfs-tsm aims to address a superset of TSM specific functionality
with a common ABI where attributes may appear, or not appear, based on
the set of concepts the implementation supports.
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64961c3baf8ce_142af829436@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch [1]
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/57f3a05e-8fcd-4656-beea-56bb8365ae64@linux.microsoft.com [2]
Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
