summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2005-11-04Merge by HandJames Bottomley
Conflicts in dec_esp.c (Thanks Bacchus), scsi_transport_iscsi.c and scsi_transport_fc.h Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-10-30[PATCH] fix missing includesTim Schmielau
I recently picked up my older work to remove unnecessary #includes of sched.h, starting from a patch by Dave Jones to not include sched.h from module.h. This reduces the number of indirect includes of sched.h by ~300. Another ~400 pointless direct includes can be removed after this disentangling (patch to follow later). However, quite a few indirect includes need to be fixed up for this. In order to feed the patches through -mm with as little disturbance as possible, I've split out the fixes I accumulated up to now (complete for i386 and x86_64, more archs to follow later) and post them before the real patch. This way this large part of the patch is kept simple with only adding #includes, and all hunks are independent of each other. So if any hunk rejects or gets in the way of other patches, just drop it. My scripts will pick it up again in the next round. Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-28[SCSI] update fc_transport for removal of block/unblock functionsJames.Smart@Emulex.Com
We recently went back to implement a board reset. When we perform the reset, we wanted to tear down the internal data structures and rebuild them. Unfortunately, when it came to the rport structure, things were odd. If we deleted them, the scsi targets and sdevs would be torn down. Not a good thing for a temporary reset. We could block the rports, but we either maintain the internal structures to keep the rport reference (perhaps even replicating what's in the transport), or we have to fatten the fc transport with new search routines to find the rport (and deal with a case of a dangling rport that the driver forgets). It dawned on me that we had actually reached this state incorrectly. When the fc transport first started, we did the block/unblock first, then added the rport interface. The purpose of block/unblock is to hide the temporary disappearance of the rport (e.g. being deleted, then readded). Why are we making the driver do the block/unblock ? We should be making the transport have only an rport add/delete, and the let the transport handle the block/unblock. So... This patch removes the existing fc_remote_port_block/unblock functions. It moves the block/unblock functionality into the fc_remote_port_add/delete functions. Updates for the lpfc driver are included. Qlogic driver updates are also enclosed, thanks to the contributions of Andrew Vasquez. [Note: the qla2xxx changes are relative to the scsi-misc-2.6 tree as of this morning - which does not include the recent patches sent by Andrew]. The zfcp driver does not use the block/unblock functions. One last comment: The resulting behavior feels very clean. The LLDD is concerned only with add/delete, which corresponds to the physical disappearance. However, the fact that the scsi target and sdevs are not immediately torn down after the LLDD calls delete causes an interesting scenario... the midlayer can call the xxx_slave_alloc and xxx_queuecommand functions with a sdev that is at the location the rport used to be. The driver must validate the device exists when it first enters these functions. In thinking about it, this has always been the case for the LLDD and these routines. The existing drivers already check for existence. However, this highlights that simple validation via data structure dereferencing needs to be watched. To deal with this, a new transport function, fc_remote_port_chkready() was created that LLDDs should call when they first enter these two routines. It validates the rport state, and returns a scsi result which could be returned. In addition to solving the above, it also creates consistent behavior from the LLDD's when the block and deletes are occuring. Rejections fixed up and Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-10-28[SCSI] Add an 'Issue LIP' device attribute in fc_transport classAndrew Vasquez
Ok, here's a patch to add such a common API for fc transport users. Relevant LLD changes (lpfc and qla2xxx) also present. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-09-16[SCSI] change port speed definitions for scsi_transport_fcAndreas Herrmann
obviously FC Port Speeds in scsi_transport_fc.h are defined according to FC-HBA: #define FC_PORTSPEED_1GBIT 1 #define FC_PORTSPEED_2GBIT 2 #define FC_PORTSPEED_10GBIT 4 #define FC_PORTSPEED_4GBIT 8 Problem is, whoever invented FC-HBA did not care about FC-FS or FC-GS-x. Following FC-FS/FC-GS-x defintions of port speeds would look like: 1 GBit: 0x0001 2 GBit: 0x0002 4 GBit: 0x0004 10GBit: 0x0008 (and new in FC-LS: 8 Gbit: 0x0010 16GBit: 0x0020) I really appreciate if scsi_transport_fc.h would define port speeds according to FC-GS-x/FC-FS. Thus mapping of port speed capabilities to values defined in scsi_transport_fc.h can be avoided in the LLDD. Attached is a patch to change the definitions. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-09-10[SCSI] fc_transport: Generalize WWN to u64 interger conversions.Andrew Vasquez
On some platforms the hard-casting of 8 byte node_name and port_name arrays to an u64 would cause unaligned-access warnings. Generalize the conversions with a transport helper function which performs consistent shifting of WWN bytes. Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!