summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-11-12rcu/nocb: Fix missed RCU barrier on deoffloadingZqiang
Currently, running rcutorture test with torture_type=rcu fwd_progress=8 n_barrier_cbs=8 nocbs_nthreads=8 nocbs_toggle=100 onoff_interval=60 test_boost=2, will trigger the following warning: WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 100 at kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h:1061 rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload+0x292/0x2a0 RIP: 0010:rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload+0x292/0x2a0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x7e/0x120 ? rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload+0x292/0x2a0 ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload+0x292/0x2a0 rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x70/0xa0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0x136/0x1c0 ? __pfx_rcu_nocb_toggle+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xd1/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> CPU0 CPU2 CPU3 //rcu_nocb_toggle //nocb_cb_wait //rcutorture // deoffload CPU1 // process CPU1's rdp rcu_barrier() rcu_segcblist_entrain() rcu_segcblist_add_len(1); // len == 2 // enqueue barrier // callback to CPU1's // rdp->cblist rcu_do_batch() // invoke CPU1's rdp->cblist // callback rcu_barrier_callback() rcu_barrier() mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex); // still see len == 2 // enqueue barrier callback // to CPU1's rdp->cblist rcu_segcblist_entrain() rcu_segcblist_add_len(1); // len == 3 // decrement len rcu_segcblist_add_len(-2); kthread_parkme() // CPU1's rdp->cblist len == 1 // Warn because there is // still a pending barrier // trigger warning WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist)); cpus_read_unlock(); // wait CPU1 to comes online and // invoke barrier callback on // CPU1 rdp's->cblist wait_for_completion(&rcu_state.barrier_completion); // deoffload CPU4 cpus_read_lock() rcu_barrier() mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex); // block on barrier_mutex // wait rcu_barrier() on // CPU3 to unlock barrier_mutex // but CPU3 unlock barrier_mutex // need to wait CPU1 comes online // when CPU1 going online will block on cpus_write_lock The above scenario will not only trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE(), but also trigger a deadlock. Thanks to nocb locking, a second racing rcu_barrier() on an offline CPU will either observe the decremented callback counter down to 0 and spare the callback enqueue, or rcuo will observe the new callback and keep rdp->nocb_cb_sleep to false. Therefore check rdp->nocb_cb_sleep before parking to make sure no further rcu_barrier() is waiting on the rdp. Fixes: 1fcb932c8b5c ("rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machine") Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2024-10-10rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirqFrederic Weisbecker
After a CPU has set itself offline and before it eventually calls rcutree_report_cpu_dead(), there are still opportunities for callbacks to be enqueued, for example from a softirq. When that happens on NOCB, the rcuog wake-up is deferred through an IPI to an online CPU in order not to call into the scheduler and risk arming the RT-bandwidth after hrtimers have been migrated out and disabled. But performing a synchronized IPI from a softirq is buggy as reported in the following scenario: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at kernel/smp.c:633 smp_call_function_single Modules linked in: rcutorture torture CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00012-g9139f93209d1 #1 Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x320 <- __stop_cpus+0xd0/0x120 RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single <IRQ> swake_up_one_online __call_rcu_nocb_wake __call_rcu_common ? rcu_torture_one_read call_timer_fn __run_timers run_timer_softirq handle_softirqs irq_exit_rcu ? tick_handle_periodic sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt </IRQ> Fix this with forcing deferred rcuog wake up through the NOCB timer when the CPU is offline. The actual wake up will happen from rcutree_report_cpu_dead(). Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231644.4c55582d-lkp@intel.com Fixes: 9139f93209d1 ("rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPU") Reviewed-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-09-09Merge branches 'context_tracking.15.08.24a', 'csd.lock.15.08.24a', ↵Neeraj Upadhyay
'nocb.09.09.24a', 'rcutorture.14.08.24a', 'rcustall.09.09.24a', 'srcu.12.08.24a', 'rcu.tasks.14.08.24a', 'rcu_scaling_tests.15.08.24a', 'fixes.12.08.24a' and 'misc.11.08.24a' into next.09.09.24a
2024-09-09rcu/nocb: Remove superfluous memory barrier after bypass enqueueFrederic Weisbecker
Pre-GP accesses performed by the update side must be ordered against post-GP accesses performed by the readers. This is ensured by the bypass or nocb locking on enqueue time, followed by the fully ordered rnp locking initiated while callbacks are accelerated, and then propagated throughout the whole GP lifecyle associated with the callbacks. Therefore the explicit barrier advertizing ordering between bypass enqueue and rcuo wakeup is superfluous. If anything, it would even only order the first bypass callback enqueue against the rcuo wakeup and ignore all the subsequent ones. Remove the needless barrier. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-09-09rcu/nocb: Conditionally wake up rcuo if not already waiting on GPFrederic Weisbecker
A callback enqueuer currently wakes up the rcuo kthread if it is adding the first non-done callback of a CPU, whether the kthread is waiting on a grace period or not (unless the CPU is offline). This looks like a desired behaviour because then the rcuo kthread doesn't wait for the end of the current grace period to handle the callback. It is accelerated right away and assigned to the next grace period. The GP kthread is notified about that fact and iterates with the upcoming GP without sleeping in-between. However this best-case scenario is contradicted by a few details, depending on the situation: 1) If the callback is a non-bypass one queued with IRQs enabled, the wake up only occurs if no other pending callbacks are on the list. Therefore the theoretical "optimization" actually applies on rare occasions. 2) If the callback is a non-bypass one queued with IRQs disabled, the situation is similar with even more uncertainty due to the deferred wake up. 3) If the callback is lazy, a few jiffies don't make any difference. 4) If the callback is bypass, the wake up timer is programmed 2 jiffies ahead by rcuo in case the regular pending queue has been handled in the meantime. The rare storm of callbacks can otherwise wait for the currently elapsing grace period to be flushed and handled. For all those reasons, the optimization is only theoretical and occasional. Therefore it is reasonable that callbacks enqueuers only wake up the rcuo kthread when it is not already waiting on a grace period to complete. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-09-09rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPUFrederic Weisbecker
After a CPU is marked offline and until it reaches its final trip to idle, rcuo has several opportunities to be woken up, either because a callback has been queued in the meantime or because rcutree_report_cpu_dead() has issued the final deferred NOCB wake up. If RCU-boosting is enabled, RCU kthreads are set to SCHED_FIFO policy. And if RT-bandwidth is enabled, the related hrtimer might be armed. However this then happens after hrtimers have been migrated at the CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, which is broken as reported by the following warning: Call trace: enqueue_hrtimer+0x7c/0xf8 hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x2b8/0x300 enqueue_task_rt+0x298/0x3f0 enqueue_task+0x94/0x188 ttwu_do_activate+0xb4/0x27c try_to_wake_up+0x2d8/0x79c wake_up_process+0x18/0x28 __wake_nocb_gp+0x80/0x1a0 do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common+0x3c/0xcc rcu_report_dead+0x68/0x1ac cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x48/0x9c do_idle+0x288/0x294 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x3c secondary_start_kernel+0x138/0x158 Fix this with waking up rcuo using an IPI if necessary. Since the existing API to deal with this situation only handles swait queue, rcuo is only woken up from offline CPUs if it's not already waiting on a grace period. In the worst case some callbacks will just wait for a grace period to complete before being assigned to a subsequent one. Reported-by: "Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)" <Cheng-Jui.Wang@mediatek.com> Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-09-09rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machineFrederic Weisbecker
Now that the (de-)offloading process can only apply to offline CPUs, there is no more concurrency between rcu_core and nocb kthreads. Also the mutation now happens on empty queues. Therefore the state machine can be reduced to a single bit called SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED. Simplify the transition as follows: * Upon offloading: queue the rdp to be added to the rcuog list and wait for the rcuog kthread to set the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit. Unpark rcuo kthread. * Upon de-offloading: Park rcuo kthread. Queue the rdp to be removed from the rcuog list and wait for the rcuog kthread to clear the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-08-15rcu: Rename rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() into rcu_momentary_eqs()Valentin Schneider
The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to RCU_WATCHING, replace "dyntick_idle" into "eqs" to drop the dyntick reference. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_RCU_COREFrederic Weisbecker
RCU core can't be running anymore while in the middle of (de-)offloading since this sort of transition now only applies to offline CPUs. The SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE state can therefore be removed. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from bypassFrederic Weisbecker
Bypass enqueue can't happen anymore in the middle of (de-)offloading since this sort of transition now only applies to offline CPUs. The related safety check can therefore be removed. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: (De-)offload callbacks on offline CPUs onlyFrederic Weisbecker
Currently callbacks can be (de-)offloaded only on online CPUs. This involves an overly elaborated state machine in order to make sure that callbacks are always handled during the process while ensuring synchronization between rcu_core and NOCB kthreads. The only potential user of NOCB (de-)offloading appears to be a nohz_full toggling interface through cpusets. And the general agreement is now to work toward toggling the nohz_full state on offline CPUs to simplify the whole picture. Therefore, convert the (de-)offloading to only support offline CPUs. This involves the following changes: * Call rcu_barrier() before deoffloading. An offline offloaded CPU may still carry callbacks in its queue ignored by rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). Those callbacks must all be flushed before switching to a regular queue because no more kthreads will handle those before the CPU ever gets re-onlined. This means that further calls to rcu_barrier() will find an empty queue until the CPU goes through rcutree_report_cpu_starting(). As a result it is guaranteed that further rcu_barrier() won't try to lock the nocb_lock for that target and thus won't risk an imbalance. Therefore barrier_mutex doesn't need to be locked anymore upon deoffloading. * Assume the queue is empty before offloading, as rcutree_migrate_callbacks() took care of everything. This means that further calls to rcu_barrier() will find an empty queue until the CPU goes through rcutree_report_cpu_starting(). As a result it is guaranteed that further rcu_barrier() won't risk a nocb_lock imbalance. Therefore barrier_mutex doesn't need to be locked anymore upon offloading. * No need to flush bypass anymore. Further simplifications will follow in upcoming patches. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: Introduce nocb mutexFrederic Weisbecker
The barrier_mutex is used currently to protect (de-)offloading operations and prevent from nocb_lock locking imbalance in rcu_barrier() and shrinker, and also from misordered RCU barrier invocation. Now since RCU (de-)offloading is going to happen on offline CPUs, an RCU barrier will have to be executed while transitionning from offloaded to de-offloaded state. And this can't happen while holding the barrier_mutex. Introduce a NOCB mutex to protect (de-)offloading transitions. The barrier_mutex is still held for now when necessary to avoid barrier callbacks reordering and nocb_lock imbalance. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: Assert no callbacks while nocb kthread allocation failsFrederic Weisbecker
When a NOCB CPU fails to create a nocb kthread on bringup, the CPU is then deoffloaded. The barrier mutex is locked at this stage. It is typically used to protect against concurrent (de-)offloading and/or concurrent rcu_barrier() that would otherwise risk a nocb locking imbalance. However: * rcu_barrier() can't run concurrently if it's the boot CPU on early boot-up. * rcu_barrier() can run concurrently if it's a secondary CPU but it is expected to see 0 callbacks on this target because it's the first time it boots. * (de-)offloading can't happen concurrently with smp_init(), as rcutorture is initialized later, at least not before device_initcall(), and userspace isn't available yet. * (de-)offloading can't happen concurrently with cpu_up(), courtesy of cpu_hotplug_lock. But: * The lazy shrinker might run concurrently with cpu_up(). It shouldn't try to grab the nocb_lock and risk an imbalance due to lazy_len supposed to be 0 but be extra cautious. * Also be cautious against resume from hibernation potential subtleties. So keep the locking and add some assertions and comments. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-07-29rcu/nocb: Introduce RCU_NOCB_LOCKDEP_WARN()Frederic Weisbecker
Checking for races against concurrent (de-)offloading implies the creation of !CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU stubs to check if each relevant lock is held. For now this only implies the nocb_lock but more are to be expected. Create instead a NOCB specific version of RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() to avoid the proliferation of stubs. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
2024-06-03rcu/nocb: Remove buggy bypass lock contention mitigationFrederic Weisbecker
The bypass lock contention mitigation assumes there can be at most 2 contenders on the bypass lock, following this scheme: 1) One kthread takes the bypass lock 2) Another one spins on it and increment the contended counter 3) A third one (a bypass enqueuer) sees the contended counter on and busy loops waiting on it to decrement. However this assumption is wrong. There can be only one CPU to find the lock contended because call_rcu() (the bypass enqueuer) is the only bypass lock acquire site that may not already hold the NOCB lock beforehand, all the other sites must first contend on the NOCB lock. Therefore step 2) is impossible. The other problem is that the mitigation assumes that contenders all belong to the same rdp CPU, which is also impossible for a raw spinlock. In theory the warning could trigger if the enqueuer holds the bypass lock and another CPU flushes the bypass queue concurrently but this is prevented from all flush users: 1) NOCB kthreads only flush if they successfully _tried_ to lock the bypass lock. So no contention management here. 2) Flush on callbacks migration happen remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 3) Flush on deoffloading happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is not yet online. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. 4) Flush on barrier entrain happen either locally with IRQs disabled or remotely when the CPU is offline. No concurrency against bypass enqueue. For those reasons, the bypass lock contention mitigation isn't needed and is even wrong. Remove it but keep the warning reporting a contended bypass lock on a remote CPU, to keep unexpected contention awareness. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2024-06-03rcu/nocb: Use kthread parking instead of ad-hoc implementationFrederic Weisbecker
Upon NOCB deoffloading, the rcuo kthread must be forced to sleep until the corresponding rdp is ever offloaded again. The deoffloader clears the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED flag, wakes up the rcuo kthread which then notices that change and clears in turn its SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB flag before going to sleep, until it ever sees the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED flag again, should a re-offloading happen. Upon NOCB offloading, the rcuo kthread must be forced to wake up and handle callbacks until the corresponding rdp is ever deoffloaded again. The offloader sets the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED flag, wakes up the rcuo kthread which then notices that change and sets in turn its SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB flag before going to check callbacks, until it ever sees the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED flag cleared again, should a de-offloading happen again. This is all a crude ad-hoc and error-prone kthread (un-)parking re-implementation. Consolidate the behaviour with the appropriate API instead. [ paulmck: Apply Qiang Zhang feedback provided in Link: below. ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240509074046.15629-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2024-02-26Merge branches 'rcu-doc.2024.02.14a', 'rcu-nocb.2024.02.14a', ↵Boqun Feng
'rcu-exp.2024.02.14a', 'rcu-tasks.2024.02.26a' and 'rcu-misc.2024.02.14a' into rcu.2024.02.26a
2024-02-14rcu: Rename jiffies_till_flush to jiffies_lazy_flushFrederic Weisbecker
The variable name jiffies_till_flush is too generic and therefore: * It may shadow a global variable * It doesn't tell on what it operates Make the name more precise, along with the related APIs. Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Check rdp_gp->nocb_timer in __call_rcu_nocb_wake()Zqiang
Currently, only rdp_gp->nocb_timer is used, for nocb_timer of no-rdp_gp structure, the timer_pending() is always return false, this commit therefore need to check rdp_gp->nocb_timer in __call_rcu_nocb_wake(). Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE() in the rcu_nocb_bypass_lock()Zqiang
For the kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y and CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y, the following scenarios will trigger WARN_ON_ONCE() in the rcu_nocb_bypass_lock() and rcu_nocb_wait_contended() functions: CPU2 CPU11 kthread rcu_nocb_cb_kthread ksys_write rcu_do_batch vfs_write rcu_torture_timer_cb proc_sys_write __kmem_cache_free proc_sys_call_handler kmemleak_free drop_caches_sysctl_handler delete_object_full drop_slab __delete_object shrink_slab put_object lazy_rcu_shrink_scan call_rcu rcu_nocb_flush_bypass __call_rcu_commn rcu_nocb_bypass_lock raw_spin_trylock(&rdp->nocb_bypass_lock) fail atomic_inc(&rdp->nocb_lock_contended); rcu_nocb_wait_contended WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != rdp->cpu); WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->nocb_lock_contended)) | |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _same rdp and rdp->cpu != 11_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __| Reproduce this bug with "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches". This commit therefore uses rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass() instead of rcu_nocb_flush_bypass() in lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(). If the nocb_bypass queue is being flushed, then rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass will return directly. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Re-arrange call_rcu() NOCB specific codeFrederic Weisbecker
Currently the call_rcu() function interleaves NOCB and !NOCB enqueue code in a complicated way such that: * The bypass enqueue code may or may not have enqueued and may or may not have locked the ->nocb_lock. Everything that follows is in a Schrödinger locking state for the unwary reviewer's eyes. * The was_alldone is always set but only used in NOCB related code. * The NOCB wake up is distantly related to the locking hopefully performed by the bypass enqueue code that did not enqueue on the bypass list. Unconfuse the whole and gather NOCB and !NOCB specific enqueue code to their own functions. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Make IRQs disablement symmetricFrederic Weisbecker
Currently IRQs are disabled on call_rcu() and then depending on the context: * If the CPU is in nocb mode: - If the callback is enqueued in the bypass list, IRQs are re-enabled implictly by rcu_nocb_try_bypass() - If the callback is enqueued in the normal list, IRQs are re-enabled implicitly by __call_rcu_nocb_wake() * If the CPU is NOT in nocb mode, IRQs are reenabled explicitly from call_rcu() This makes the code a bit hard to follow, especially as it interleaves with nocb locking. To make the IRQ flags coverage clearer and also in order to prepare for moving all the nocb enqueue code to its own function, always re-enable the IRQ flags explicitly from call_rcu(). Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Remove needless full barrier after callback advancingFrederic Weisbecker
A full barrier is issued from nocb_gp_wait() upon callbacks advancing to order grace period completion with callbacks execution. However these two events are already ordered by the smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() barrier within the call to raw_spin_lock_rcu_node() that is necessary for callbacks advancing to happen. The following litmus test shows the kind of guarantee that this barrier provides: C smp_mb__after_unlock_lock {} // rcu_gp_cleanup() P0(spinlock_t *rnp_lock, int *gpnum) { // Grace period cleanup increase gp sequence number spin_lock(rnp_lock); WRITE_ONCE(*gpnum, 1); spin_unlock(rnp_lock); } // nocb_gp_wait() P1(spinlock_t *rnp_lock, spinlock_t *nocb_lock, int *gpnum, int *cb_ready) { int r1; // Call rcu_advance_cbs() from nocb_gp_wait() spin_lock(nocb_lock); spin_lock(rnp_lock); smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); r1 = READ_ONCE(*gpnum); WRITE_ONCE(*cb_ready, 1); spin_unlock(rnp_lock); spin_unlock(nocb_lock); } // nocb_cb_wait() P2(spinlock_t *nocb_lock, int *cb_ready, int *cb_executed) { int r2; // rcu_do_batch() -> rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() spin_lock(nocb_lock); r2 = READ_ONCE(*cb_ready); spin_unlock(nocb_lock); // Actual callback execution WRITE_ONCE(*cb_executed, 1); } P3(int *cb_executed, int *gpnum) { int r3; WRITE_ONCE(*cb_executed, 2); smp_mb(); r3 = READ_ONCE(*gpnum); } exists (1:r1=1 /\ 2:r2=1 /\ cb_executed=2 /\ 3:r3=0) (* Bad outcome. *) Here the bad outcome only occurs if the smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() is removed. This barrier orders the grace period completion against callbacks advancing and even later callbacks invocation, thanks to the opportunistic propagation via the ->nocb_lock to nocb_cb_wait(). Therefore the smp_mb() placed after callbacks advancing can be safely removed. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2024-02-14rcu/nocb: Remove needless LOAD-ACQUIREFrederic Weisbecker
The LOAD-ACQUIRE access performed on rdp->nocb_cb_sleep advertizes ordering callback execution against grace period completion. However this is contradicted by the following: * This LOAD-ACQUIRE doesn't pair with anything. The only counterpart barrier that can be found is the smp_mb() placed after callbacks advancing in nocb_gp_wait(). However the barrier is placed _after_ ->nocb_cb_sleep write. * Callbacks can be concurrently advanced between the LOAD-ACQUIRE on ->nocb_cb_sleep and the call to rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() in rcu_do_batch(), making any ordering based on ->nocb_cb_sleep broken. * Both rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() and rcu_advance_cbs() are called under the nocb_lock, the latter hereby providing already the desired ACQUIRE semantics. Therefore it is safe to access ->nocb_cb_sleep with a simple compiler barrier. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2023-10-04rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinkerQi Zheng
Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230911094444.68966-16-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Cc: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru> Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com> Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-16rcu: Make the rcu_nocb_poll boot parameter usable via boot configPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot parameter is defined via early_param(), whose parsing functions are invoked from parse_early_param() which is in turn invoked by setup_arch(), which is very early indeed.  It is invoked so early that the console output timestamps read 0.000000, in other words, before time begins. This use of early_param() means that the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot parameter cannot usefully be embedded into the kernel image. Yes, you can embed it, but setup_boot_config() is invoked from start_kernel() too late for it to be parsed. But it makes no sense to parse this parameter so early. After all, it cannot do anything until the rcuog kthreads are created, which is long after rcu_init() time, let alone setup_boot_config() time. This commit therefore switches the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot parameter from early_param() to __setup(), which allows boot-config parsing of this parameter, in turn allowing it to be embedded into the kernel image. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-05-11rcu/nocb: Make shrinker iterate only over NOCB CPUsFrederic Weisbecker
Callbacks can only be queued as lazy on NOCB CPUs, therefore iterating over the NOCB mask is enough for both counting and scanning. Just lock the mostly uncontended barrier mutex on counting as well in order to keep rcu_nocb_mask stable. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09rcu/nocb: Recheck lazy callbacks under the ->nocb_lock from shrinkerFrederic Weisbecker
The ->lazy_len is only checked locklessly. Recheck again under the ->nocb_lock to avoid spending more time on flushing/waking if not necessary. The ->lazy_len can still increment concurrently (from 1 to infinity) but under the ->nocb_lock we at least know for sure if there are lazy callbacks at all (->lazy_len > 0). Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09rcu/nocb: Fix shrinker race against callback enqueuerFrederic Weisbecker
The shrinker resets the lazy callbacks counter in order to trigger the pending lazy queue flush though the rcuog kthread. The counter reset is protected by the ->nocb_lock against concurrent accesses...except for one of them. Here is a list of existing synchronized readers/writer: 1) The first lazy enqueuer (incrementing ->lazy_len to 1) does so under ->nocb_lock and ->nocb_bypass_lock. 2) The further lazy enqueuers (incrementing ->lazy_len above 1) do so under ->nocb_bypass_lock _only_. 3) The lazy flush checks and resets to 0 under ->nocb_lock and ->nocb_bypass_lock. The shrinker protects its ->lazy_len reset against cases 1) and 3) but not against 2). As such, setting ->lazy_len to 0 under the ->nocb_lock may be cancelled right away by an overwrite from an enqueuer, leading rcuog to ignore the flush. To avoid that, use the proper bypass flush API which takes care of all those details. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09rcu/nocb: Protect lazy shrinker against concurrent (de-)offloadingFrederic Weisbecker
The shrinker may run concurrently with callbacks (de-)offloading. As such, calling rcu_nocb_lock() is very dangerous because it does a conditional locking. The worst outcome is that rcu_nocb_lock() doesn't lock but rcu_nocb_unlock() eventually unlocks, or the reverse, creating an imbalance. Fix this with protecting against (de-)offloading using the barrier mutex. Although if the barrier mutex is contended, which should be rare, then step aside so as not to trigger a mutex VS allocation dependency chain. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-05rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernelsZqiang
The lazy_rcu_shrink_count() shrinker function is registered even in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n, in which case this function uselessly consumes cycles learning that no CPU has any lazy callbacks queued. This commit therefore registers this shrinker function only in the kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y, where it might actually do something useful. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2022-11-29rcu: Shrinker for lazy rcuVineeth Pillai
The shrinker is used to speed up the free'ing of memory potentially held by RCU lazy callbacks. RCU kernel module test cases show this to be effective. Test is introduced in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-11-29rcu: Refactor code a bit in rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass()Joel Fernandes (Google)
This consolidates the code a bit and makes it cleaner. Functionally it is the same. Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-11-29rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save powerJoel Fernandes (Google)
Implement timer-based RCU callback batching (also known as lazy callbacks). With this we save about 5-10% of power consumed due to RCU requests that happen when system is lightly loaded or idle. By default, all async callbacks (queued via call_rcu) are marked lazy. An alternate API call_rcu_hurry() is provided for the few users, for example synchronize_rcu(), that need the old behavior. The batch is flushed whenever a certain amount of time has passed, or the batch on a particular CPU grows too big. Also memory pressure will flush it in a future patch. To handle several corner cases automagically (such as rcu_barrier() and hotplug), we re-use bypass lists which were originally introduced to address lock contention, to handle lazy CBs as well. The bypass list length has the lazy CB length included in it. A separate lazy CB length counter is also introduced to keep track of the number of lazy CBs. [ paulmck: Fix formatting of inline call_rcu_lazy() definition. ] [ paulmck: Apply Zqiang feedback. ] [ paulmck: Apply s/call_rcu_flush/call_rcu_hurry/ feedback from Tejun Heo. ] Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-10-18rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier()Frederic Weisbecker
In preparation for RCU lazy changes, wake up the RCU nocb gp thread if needed after an entrain. This change prevents the RCU barrier callback from waiting in the queue for several seconds before the lazy callbacks in front of it are serviced. Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-10-18rcu: Fix late wakeup when flush of bypass cblist happensJoel Fernandes (Google)
When the bypass cblist gets too big or its timeout has occurred, it is flushed into the main cblist. However, the bypass timer is still running and the behavior is that it would eventually expire and wake the GP thread. Since we are going to use the bypass cblist for lazy CBs, do the wakeup soon as the flush for "too big or too long" bypass list happens. Otherwise, long delays can happen for callbacks which get promoted from lazy to non-lazy. This is a good thing to do anyway (regardless of future lazy patches), since it makes the behavior consistent with behavior of other code paths where flushing into the ->cblist makes the GP kthread into a non-sleeping state quickly. [ Frederic Weisbecker: Changes to avoid unnecessary GP-thread wakeups plus comment changes. ] Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-10-18rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handlingZhen Lei
In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask. Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocbs= will not have allocated rcu_nocb_mask. And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the rcu_nocb and nohz_full state. But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the rcu_nocb_mask state. This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31rcu/nocb: Add CPU number to CPU-{,de}offload failure messagesPaul E. McKenney
Offline CPUs cannot be offloaded or deoffloaded. Any attempt to offload or deoffload an offline CPU causes a message to be printed on the console, which is good, but this message does not contain the CPU number, which is bad. Such a CPU number can be helpful when debugging, as it gives a clear indication that the CPU in question is in fact offline. This commit therefore adds the CPU number to the CPU-{,de}offload failure messages. Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31rcu/nocb: Choose the right rcuog/rcuop kthreads to outputZqiang
The show_rcu_nocb_gp_state() function is supposed to dump out the rcuog kthread and the show_rcu_nocb_state() function is supposed to dump out the rcuo[ps] kthread. Currently, both do a mixture, which is not optimal for debugging, even though it does not affect functionality. This commit therefore adjusts these two functions to focus on their respective kthreads. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Avoid polling when my_rdp->nocb_head_rdp list is emptyZqiang
Currently, if the 'rcu_nocb_poll' kernel boot parameter is enabled, all rcuog kthreads enter polling mode. However, if all of a given group of rcuo kthreads correspond to CPUs that have been de-offloaded, the corresponding rcuog kthread will nonetheless still wake up periodically, unnecessarily consuming power and perturbing workloads. Fortunately, this situation is easily detected by the fact that the rcuog kthread's CPU's rcu_data structure's ->nocb_head_rdp list is empty. This commit saves power and avoids unnecessarily perturbing workloads by putting an rcuog kthread to sleep during any time period when all of its rcuo kthreads' CPUs are de-offloaded. Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Add option to opt rcuo kthreads out of RT priorityUladzislau Rezki (Sony)
This commit introduces a RCU_NOCB_CPU_CB_BOOST Kconfig option that prevents rcuo kthreads from running at real-time priority, even in kernels built with RCU_BOOST. This capability is important to devices needing low-latency (as in a few milliseconds) response from expedited RCU grace periods, but which are not running a classic real-time workload. On such devices, permitting the rcuo kthreads to run at real-time priority results in unacceptable latencies imposed on the application tasks, which run as SCHED_OTHER. See for example the following trace output: <snip> <...>-60 [006] d..1 2979.028717: rcu_batch_start: rcu_preempt CBs=34619 bl=270 <snip> If that rcuop kthread were permitted to run at real-time SCHED_FIFO priority, it would monopolize its CPU for hundreds of milliseconds while invoking those 34619 RCU callback functions, which would cause an unacceptably long latency spike for many application stacks on Android platforms. However, some existing real-time workloads require that callback invocation run at SCHED_FIFO priority, for example, those running on systems with heavy SCHED_OTHER background loads. (It is the real-time system's administrator's responsibility to make sure that important real-time tasks run at a higher priority than do RCU's kthreads.) Therefore, this new RCU_NOCB_CPU_CB_BOOST Kconfig option defaults to "y" on kernels built with PREEMPT_RT and defaults to "n" otherwise. The effect is to preserve current behavior for real-time systems, but for other systems to allow expedited RCU grace periods to run with real-time priority while continuing to invoke RCU callbacks as SCHED_OTHER. As you would expect, this RCU_NOCB_CPU_CB_BOOST Kconfig option has no effect except on CPUs with offloaded RCU callbacks. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Add an option to offload all CPUs on bootJoel Fernandes
Systems built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y but booted without either the rcu_nocbs= or rcu_nohz_full= kernel-boot parameters will not have callback offloading on any of the CPUs, nor can any of the CPUs be switched to enable callback offloading at runtime. Although this is intentional, it would be nice to have a way to offload all the CPUs without having to make random bootloaders specify either the rcu_nocbs= or the rcu_nohz_full= kernel-boot parameters. This commit therefore provides a new CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL Kconfig option that switches the default so as to offload callback processing on all of the CPUs. This default can still be overridden using the rcu_nocbs= and rcu_nohz_full= kernel-boot parameters. Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> (In v4.1, fixed issues with CONFIG maze reported by kernel test robot). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Fix NOCB kthreads spawn failure with rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() ↵Zqiang
direct call If the rcuog/o[p] kthreads spawn failed, the offloaded rdp needs to be explicitly deoffloaded, otherwise the target rdp is still considered offloaded even though nothing actually handles the callbacks. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Invert rcu_state.barrier_mutex VS hotplug lock locking orderZqiang
In case of failure to spawn either rcuog or rcuo[p] kthreads for a given rdp, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() needs to be called with the hotplug lock and the barrier_mutex held. However cpus write lock is already held while calling rcutree_prepare_cpu(). It's not possible to call rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() from there with just locking the barrier_mutex or this would result in a locking inversion against rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload() which holds both locks in the reverse order. Simply solve this with inverting the locking order inside rcu_nocb_cpu_[de]offload(). This will be a pre-requisite to toggle NOCB states toward cpusets anyway. Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19rcu/nocb: Add/del rdp to iterate from rcuog itselfFrederic Weisbecker
NOCB rdp's are part of a group whose list is iterated by the corresponding rdp leader. This list is RCU traversed because an rdp can be either added or deleted concurrently. Upon addition, a new iteration to the list after a synchronization point (a pair of LOCK/UNLOCK ->nocb_gp_lock) is forced to make sure: 1) we didn't miss a new element added in the middle of an iteration 2) we didn't ignore a whole subset of the list due to an element being quickly deleted and then re-added. 3) we prevent from probably other surprises... Although this layout is expected to be safe, it doesn't help anybody to sleep well. Simplify instead the nocb state toggling with moving the list modification from the nocb (de-)offloading workqueue to the rcuog kthreads instead. Whenever the rdp leader is expected to (re-)set the SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP flag of a target rdp, the latter is queued so that the leader handles the flag flip along with adding or deleting the target rdp to the list to iterate. This way the list modification and iteration happen from the same kthread and those operations can't race altogether. As a bonus, the flags for each rdp don't need to be checked locklessly before each iteration, which is one less opportunity to produce nightmares. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
2022-04-11rcu/nocb: Initialize nocb kthreads only for boot CPU prior SMP initializationFrederic Weisbecker
The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall, which means that SMP initialization hasn't happened yet and only the boot CPU is online. Therefore, create only the NOCB kthreads related to the boot CPU. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-04-11rcu/nocb: Move rcu_nocb_is_setup to rcu_stateFrederic Weisbecker
This commit moves the RCU nocb initialization witness within rcu_state to consolidate RCU's global state. Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-04-11rcu: Remove rcu_is_nocb_cpu()Frederic Weisbecker
The rcu_is_nocb_cpu() function is no longer used, so this commmit removes it. Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-02-24Merge branches 'exp.2022.02.24a', 'fixes.2022.02.14a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'rcu_barrier.2022.02.08a', 'rcu-tasks.2022.02.08a', 'rt.2022.02.01b', 'torture.2022.02.01b' and 'torturescript.2022.02.08a' into HEAD exp.2022.02.24a: Expedited grace-period updates. fixes.2022.02.14a: Miscellaneous fixes. rcu_barrier.2022.02.08a: Make rcu_barrier() no longer exclude CPU hotplug. rcu-tasks.2022.02.08a: RCU-tasks updates. rt.2022.02.01b: Real-time-related updates. torture.2022.02.01b: Torture-test updates. torturescript.2022.02.08a: Torture-test scripting updates.
2022-02-14rcu: Replace cpumask_weight with cpumask_empty where appropriateYury Norov
In some places, RCU code calls cpumask_weight() to check if any bit of a given cpumask is set. We can do it more efficiently with cpumask_empty() because cpumask_empty() stops traversing the cpumask as soon as it finds first set bit, while cpumask_weight() counts all bits unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>