summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-01-25rcu: Forgive slow expedited grace periods at boot timePaul E. McKenney
Boot-time processing often loops in the kernel longer than one might prefer, which can prevent expedited grace periods from completing in a timely manner. This in turn triggers a splat In nohz_full CPUs One could argue that long-looping code should be fixed, but on the other hand, boot time is a bit special. This commit therefore removes the splat. Later commits will add the splat back in, but in a way that removes false positives. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24Merge branches 'doc.2019.12.10a', 'exp.2019.12.09a', 'fixes.2020.01.24a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a', 'list.2020.01.10a', 'preempt.2020.01.24a' and 'torture.2019.12.09a' into HEAD doc.2019.12.10a: Documentations updates exp.2019.12.09a: Expedited grace-period updates fixes.2020.01.24a: Miscellaneous fixes kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a: Batch kfree_rcu() work list.2020.01.10a: RCU-protected-list updates preempt.2020.01.24a: Preemptible RCU updates torture.2019.12.09a: Torture-test updates
2020-01-24rcu: Remove unused stop-machine #includePaul E. McKenney
Long ago, RCU used the stop-machine mechanism to implement expedited grace periods, but no longer does so. This commit therefore removes the no-longer-needed #includes of linux/stop_machine.h. Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/805317/ Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24srcu: Apply *_ONCE() to ->srcu_last_gp_endPaul E. McKenney
The ->srcu_last_gp_end field is accessed from any CPU at any time by synchronize_srcu(), so non-initialization references need to use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(). This commit therefore makes that change. Reported-by: syzbot+08f3e9d26e5541e1ecf2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Switch force_qs_rnp() to for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask()Paul E. McKenney
Currently, force_qs_rnp() uses a for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu() loop containing a check of the current CPU's bit in ->qsmask. This works, but this commit saves three lines by instead using for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(), which combines the functionality of for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu() and leaf_node_cpu_bit(). This commit also replaces the use of the local variable "bit" with rdp->grpmask. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Move rcu_{expedited,normal} definitions into rcupdate.hBen Dooks
This commit moves the rcu_{expedited,normal} definitions from kernel/rcu/update.c to include/linux/rcupdate.h to make sure they are in sync, and also to avoid the following warning from sparse: kernel/ksysfs.c:150:5: warning: symbol 'rcu_expedited' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/ksysfs.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'rcu_normal' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Move gp_state_names[] and gp_state_getname() to tree_stall.hLai Jiangshan
Only tree_stall.h needs to get name from GP state, so this commit moves the gp_state_names[] array and the gp_state_getname() from kernel/rcu/tree.h and kernel/rcu/tree.c, respectively, to kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h. While moving gp_state_names[], this commit uses the GCC syntax to ensure that the right string is associated with the right CPP macro. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Remove the declaration of call_rcu() in tree.hLai Jiangshan
The call_rcu() function is an external RCU API that is declared in include/linux/rcupdate.h. There is thus no point in redeclaring it in kernel/rcu/tree.h, so this commit removes that redundant declaration. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Fix tracepoint tracking RCU CPU kthread utilizationLai Jiangshan
In the call to trace_rcu_utilization() at the start of the loop in rcu_cpu_kthread(), "rcu_wait" is incorrect, plus this trace event needs to be hoisted above the loop to balance with either the "rcu_wait" or "rcu_yield", depending on how the loop exits. This commit therefore makes these changes. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Fix harmless omission of "CONFIG_" from #if conditionLai Jiangshan
The C preprocessor macros SRCU and TINY_RCU should instead be CONFIG_SRCU and CONFIG_TINY_RCU, respectively in the #f in kernel/rcu/rcu.h. But there is no harm when "TINY_RCU" is wrongly used, which are always non-defined, which makes "!defined(TINY_RCU)" always true, which means the code block is always included, and the included code block doesn't cause any compilation error so far in CONFIG_TINY_RCU builds. It is also the reason this change should not be taken in -stable. This commit adds the needed "CONFIG_" prefix to both macros. Not for -stable. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Avoid tick_dep_set_cpu() misorderingPaul E. McKenney
In the current code, rcu_nmi_enter_common() might decide to turn on the tick using tick_dep_set_cpu(), but be delayed just before doing so. Then the grace-period kthread might notice that the CPU in question had in fact gone through a quiescent state, thus turning off the tick using tick_dep_clear_cpu(). The later invocation of tick_dep_set_cpu() would then incorrectly leave the tick on. This commit therefore enlists the aid of the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock to ensure that decisions to enable or disable the tick are carried out before they can be reversed. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Provide wrappers for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nestingLai Jiangshan
This commit provides wrapper functions for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting to improve readability and to ease future changes to support inlining of __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock(). Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Use READ_ONCE() for ->expmask in rcu_read_unlock_special()Paul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->expmask field is updated only when holding the ->lock, but is also accessed locklessly. This means that all ->expmask updates must use WRITE_ONCE() and all reads carried out without holding ->lock must use READ_ONCE(). This commit therefore changes the lockless ->expmask read in rcu_read_unlock_special() to use READ_ONCE(). Reported-by: syzbot+99f4ddade3c22ab0cf23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
2020-01-24rcu: Clear ->rcu_read_unlock_special only onceLai Jiangshan
In rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(), ->rcu_read_unlock_special is cleared one piece at a time. Given that the "if" statements in this function use the copy in "special", this commit removes the clearing of the individual pieces in favor of clearing ->rcu_read_unlock_special in one go just after it has been determined to be non-zero. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Clear .exp_hint only when deferred quiescent state has been reportedLai Jiangshan
Currently, the .exp_hint flag is cleared in rcu_read_unlock_special(), which works, but which can also prevent subsequent rcu_read_unlock() calls from helping expedite the quiescent state needed by an ongoing expedited RCU grace period. This commit therefore defers clearing of .exp_hint from rcu_read_unlock_special() to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(), thus ensuring that intervening calls to rcu_read_unlock() have a chance to help end the expedited grace period. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Rename some instance of CONFIG_PREEMPTION to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCULai Jiangshan
CONFIG_PREEMPTION and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU are always identical, but some code depends on CONFIG_PREEMPTION to access to rcu_preempt functionality. This patch changes CONFIG_PREEMPTION to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU in these cases. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Remove kfree_call_rcu_nobatch()Joel Fernandes (Google)
Now that the kfree_rcu() special-casing has been removed from tree RCU, this commit removes kfree_call_rcu_nobatch() since it is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Remove kfree_rcu() special casing and lazy-callback handlingJoel Fernandes (Google)
This commit removes kfree_rcu() special-casing and the lazy-callback handling from Tree RCU. It moves some of this special casing to Tiny RCU, the removal of which will be the subject of later commits. This results in a nice negative delta. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Add slab.h #include, thanks to kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Add support for debug_objects debugging for kfree_rcu()Joel Fernandes (Google)
This commit applies RCU's debug_objects debugging to the new batched kfree_rcu() implementations. The object is queued at the kfree_rcu() call and dequeued during reclaim. Tested that enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD successfully detects double kfree_rcu() calls. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Fix IRQ per kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Add multiple in-flight batches of kfree_rcu() workJoel Fernandes (Google)
During testing, it was observed that amount of memory consumed due kfree_rcu() batching is 300-400MB. Previously we had only a single head_free pointer pointing to the list of rcu_head(s) that are to be freed after a grace period. Until this list is drained, we cannot queue any more objects on it since such objects may not be ready to be reclaimed when the worker thread eventually gets to drainin g the head_free list. We can do better by maintaining multiple lists as done by this patch. Testing shows that memory consumption came down by around 100-150MB with just adding another list. Adding more than 1 additional list did not show any improvement. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Code style and initialization handling. ] [ paulmck: Fix field name, reported by kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Make kfree_rcu() use a non-atomic ->monitor_todoJoel Fernandes
Because the ->monitor_todo field is always protected by krcp->lock, this commit downgrades from xchg() to non-atomic unmarked assignment statements. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Update to include early-boot kick code. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance TestsJoel Fernandes (Google)
This test runs kfree_rcu() in a loop to measure performance of the new kfree_rcu() batching functionality. The following table shows results when booting with arguments: rcuperf.kfree_loops=20000 rcuperf.kfree_alloc_num=8000 rcuperf.kfree_rcu_test=1 rcuperf.kfree_no_batch=X rcuperf.kfree_no_batch=X # Grace Periods Test Duration (s) X=1 (old behavior) 9133 11.5 X=0 (new behavior) 1732 12.5 On a 16 CPU system with the above boot parameters, we see that the total number of grace periods that elapse during the test drops from 9133 when not batching to 1732 when batching (a 5X improvement). The kfree_rcu() flood itself slows down a bit when batching, though, as shown. Note that the active memory consumption during the kfree_rcu() flood does increase to around 200-250MB due to the batching (from around 50MB without batching). However, this memory consumption is relatively constant. In other words, the system is able to keep up with the kfree_rcu() load. The memory consumption comes down considerably if KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES is increased from HZ/50 to HZ/80. A later patch will reduce memory consumption further by using multiple lists. Also, when running the test, please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU for realistic comparisons with/without batching. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batchingByungchul Park
Recently a discussion about stability and performance of a system involving a high rate of kfree_rcu() calls surfaced on the list [1] which led to another discussion how to prepare for this situation. This patch adds basic batching support for kfree_rcu(). It is "basic" because we do none of the slab management, dynamic allocation, code moving or any of the other things, some of which previous attempts did [2]. These fancier improvements can be follow-up patches and there are different ideas being discussed in those regards. This is an effort to start simple, and build up from there. In the future, an extension to use kfree_bulk and possibly per-slab batching could be done to further improve performance due to cache-locality and slab-specific bulk free optimizations. By using an array of pointers, the worker thread processing the work would need to read lesser data since it does not need to deal with large rcu_head(s) any longer. Torture tests follow in the next patch and show improvements of around 5x reduction in number of grace periods on a 16 CPU system. More details and test data are in that patch. There is an implication with rcu_barrier() with this patch. Since the kfree_rcu() calls can be batched, and may not be handed yet to the RCU machinery in fact, the monitor may not have even run yet to do the queue_rcu_work(), there seems no easy way of implementing rcu_barrier() to wait for those kfree_rcu()s that are already made. So this means a kfree_rcu() followed by an rcu_barrier() does not imply that memory will be freed once rcu_barrier() returns. Another implication is higher active memory usage (although not run-away..) until the kfree_rcu() flooding ends, in comparison to without batching. More details about this are in the second patch which adds an rcuperf test. Finally, in the near future we will get rid of kfree_rcu() special casing within RCU such as in rcu_do_batch and switch everything to just batching. Currently we don't do that since timer subsystem is not yet up and we cannot schedule the kfree_rcu() monitor as the timer subsystem's lock are not initialized. That would also mean getting rid of kfree_call_rcu_nobatch() entirely. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190723035725-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/19/824 Cc: kernel-team@android.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Co-developed-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Applied 0day and Paul Walmsley feedback on ->monitor_todo. ] [ paulmck: Make it work during early boot. ] [ paulmck: Add a crude early boot self-test. ] [ paulmck: Style adjustments and experimental docbook structure header. ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1908161931110.32497@viisi.sifive.com/T/#me9956f66cb611b95d26ae92700e1d901f46e8c59 Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-12rcu: Mark non-global functions and variables as staticPaul E. McKenney
Each of rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus(), rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(), and rcu_dynticks_snap() are used only in the kernel/rcu/tree.o translation unit, and may thus be marked static. This commit therefore makes this change. Reported-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2019-12-09rcutorture: Dynamically allocate rcu_fwds structurePaul E. McKenney
This commit switches from static structure to dynamic allocation for rcu_fwds as another step towards providing multiple call_rcu() forward-progress kthreads. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcutorture: Complete threading rcu_fwd pointers through functionsPaul E. McKenney
This commit threads pointers to rcu_fwd structures through the remaining functions using rcu_fwds directly, namely rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cbfree(), rcutorture_oom_notify() and rcu_torture_fwd_prog_init(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcutorture: Move to dynamic initialization of rcu_fwdsPaul E. McKenney
In order to add multiple call_rcu() forward-progress kthreads, it will be necessary to dynamically allocate and initialize. This commit therefore moves the initialization from compile time to instead immediately precede thread-creation time. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcutorture: Thread rcu_fwd pointer through forward-progress functionsPaul E. McKenney
In order to add multiple kthreads, it will be necessary to allow the various functions to operate on a pointer to their kthread's rcu_fwd structure. This commit therefore starts the process of adding the needed "struct rcu_fwd" parameters and arguments to the various callback forward-progress functions. Note that rcutorture_oom_notify() and rcu_torture_fwd_cb_hist() will eventually need to iterate over all kthreads' rcu_fwd structures. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcutorture: Pull callback forward-progress data into rcu_fwd structPaul E. McKenney
Now that RCU behaves reasonably well with the current single-kthread call_rcu() forward-progress testing, it is time to add more kthreads. This commit takes a first step towards that goal by wrapping what will be the per-kthread data into a new rcu_fwd structure. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriateSebastian Andrzej Siewior
The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPT' is used for the preemption model "Low-Latency Desktop". The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' is enabled when kernel preemption is enabled which is true for the preemption model `CONFIG_PREEMPT' and `CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT'. Use `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' if it applies to both preemption models and not just to `CONFIG_PREEMPT'. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Make PREEMPT_RCU be a modifier to TREE_RCULai Jiangshan
Currently PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_RCU are mutually exclusive Kconfig options. But PREEMPT_RCU actually specifies a kind of TREE_RCU, namely a preemptible TREE_RCU. This commit therefore makes PREEMPT_RCU be a modifer to the TREE_RCU Kconfig option. This has the benefit of simplifying several of the #if expressions that formerly needed to check both, but now need only check one or the other. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Use lockdep rather than comment to enforce lock heldPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks() function has a comment that states that the rcu_node structure's ->lock must be held, which might be informative, but which carries little weight if not read. This commit therefore removes this comment in favor of raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(), which will complain quite visibly if the required lock is not held. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Avoid data-race in rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake()Eric Dumazet
The rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake() function uses rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() to read ->gp_tasks while other cpus might overwrite this field. We need READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairs to avoid compiler tricks and KCSAN splats like the following : BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake / rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore write to 0xffffffff85a7f190 of 8 bytes by task 7317 on cpu 0: rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore+0x43d/0x580 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:507 rcu_read_unlock_special+0xec/0x370 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:659 __rcu_read_unlock+0xcf/0xe0 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:394 rcu_read_unlock include/linux/rcupdate.h:645 [inline] __ip_queue_xmit+0x3b0/0xa40 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:533 ip_queue_xmit+0x45/0x60 include/net/ip.h:236 __tcp_transmit_skb+0xdeb/0x1cd0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1158 __tcp_send_ack+0x246/0x300 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3685 tcp_send_ack+0x34/0x40 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3691 tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x130/0x360 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1575 tcp_recvmsg+0x633/0x1a30 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2179 inet_recvmsg+0xbb/0x250 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:838 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:871 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:889 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x92/0xb0 net/socket.c:885 sock_read_iter+0x15f/0x1e0 net/socket.c:967 call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:1864 [inline] new_sync_read+0x389/0x4f0 fs/read_write.c:414 read to 0xffffffff85a7f190 of 8 bytes by task 10 on cpu 1: rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake kernel/rcu/tree.c:1556 [inline] rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake+0x93/0xd0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1546 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x36c/0x580 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1611 rcu_gp_kthread+0x143/0x220 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1768 kthread+0x1d4/0x200 drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c:1253 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 1 PID: 10 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 5.3.0+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> [ paulmck: Added another READ_ONCE() for RCU CPU stall warnings. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always activeStefan Reiter
Commit 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree") added print statements to rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads for debugging, but incorrectly guarded them, causing the function to always spew out its message. This patch fixes it by guarding both pr_alert statements with dump_tree, while also changing the second pr_alert to a pr_cont, to print the hierarchy in a single line (assuming that's how it was supposed to work). Fixes: 18cd8c93e69e ("rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree") Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <stefan@pimaker.at> [ paulmck: Make single-nocbs-CPU GP kthreads look less erroneous. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Enable tick for nohz_full CPUs slow to provide expedited QSPaul E. McKenney
An expedited grace period can be stalled by a nohz_full CPU looping in kernel context. This possibility is currently handled by some carefully crafted checks in rcu_read_unlock_special() that enlist help from ksoftirqd when permitted by the scheduler. However, it is exactly these checks that require the scheduler avoid holding any of its rq or pi locks across rcu_read_unlock() without also having held them across the entire RCU read-side critical section. It would therefore be very nice if expedited grace periods could handle nohz_full CPUs looping in kernel context without such checks. This commit therefore adds code to the expedited grace period's wait and cleanup code that forces the scheduler-clock interrupt on for CPUs that fail to quickly supply a quiescent state. "Quickly" is currently a hard-coded single-jiffy delay. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Replace synchronize_sched_expedited_wait() "_sched" with "_rcu"Paul E. McKenney
After RCU flavor consolidation, synchronize_sched_expedited_wait() does both RCU-preempt and RCU-sched, whichever happens to have been built into the running kernel. This commit therefore changes this function's name to synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait() to reflect its new generic nature. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Update tree_exp.h function-header commentsPaul E. McKenney
The function-header comments in kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h have gotten a bit out of date, so this commit updates a number of them. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Rename sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done() to sync_rcu_exp_done()Paul E. McKenney
Now that the RCU flavors have been consolidated, there is one common function for checking to see if an expedited RCU grace period has completed, namely sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(). Because this function is no longer specific to RCU-preempt, this commit removes the "_preempt" from its name. This commit also changes sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done_unlocked() to sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked() for the same reason. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Allow only one expedited GP to run concurrently with wakeupsNeeraj Upadhyay
The current expedited RCU grace-period code expects that a task requesting an expedited grace period cannot awaken until that grace period has reached the wakeup phase. However, it is possible for a long preemption to result in the waiting task never sleeping. For example, consider the following sequence of events: 1. Task A starts an expedited grace period by invoking synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It proceeds normally up to the wait_event() near the end of that function, and is then preempted (or interrupted or whatever). 2. The expedited grace period completes, and a kworker task starts the awaken phase, having incremented the counter and acquired the rcu_state structure's .exp_wake_mutex. This kworker task is then preempted or interrupted or whatever. 3. Task A resumes and enters wait_event(), which notes that the expedited grace period has completed, and thus doesn't sleep. 4. Task B starts an expedited grace period exactly as did Task A, complete with the preemption (or whatever delay) just before the call to wait_event(). 5. The expedited grace period completes, and another kworker task starts the awaken phase, having incremented the counter. However, it blocks when attempting to acquire the rcu_state structure's .exp_wake_mutex because step 2's kworker task has not yet released it. 6. Steps 4 and 5 repeat, resulting in overflow of the rcu_node structure's ->exp_wq[] array. In theory, this is harmless. Tasks waiting on the various ->exp_wq[] array will just be spuriously awakened, but they will just sleep again on noting that the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence value has not advanced far enough. In practice, this wastes CPU time and is an accident waiting to happen. This commit therefore moves the rcu_exp_gp_seq_end() call that officially ends the expedited grace period (along with associate tracing) until after the ->exp_wake_mutex has been acquired. This prevents Task A from awakening prematurely, thus preventing more than one expedited grace period from being in flight during a previous expedited grace period's wakeup phase. Fixes: 3b5f668e715b ("rcu: Overlap wakeups with next expedited grace period") Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> [ paulmck: Added updated comment. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Fix missed wakeup of exp_wq waitersNeeraj Upadhyay
Tasks waiting within exp_funnel_lock() for an expedited grace period to elapse can be starved due to the following sequence of events: 1. Tasks A and B both attempt to start an expedited grace period at about the same time. This grace period will have completed when the lower four bits of the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence field are 0b'0100', for example, when the initial value of this counter is zero. Task A wins, and thus does the actual work of starting the grace period, including acquiring the rcu_state structure's .exp_mutex and sets the counter to 0b'0001'. 2. Because task B lost the race to start the grace period, it waits on ->expedited_sequence to reach 0b'0100' inside of exp_funnel_lock(). This task therefore blocks on the rcu_node structure's ->exp_wq[1] field, keeping in mind that the end-of-grace-period value of ->expedited_sequence (0b'0100') is shifted down two bits before indexing the ->exp_wq[] field. 3. Task C attempts to start another expedited grace period, but blocks on ->exp_mutex, which is still held by Task A. 4. The aforementioned expedited grace period completes, so that ->expedited_sequence now has the value 0b'0100'. A kworker task therefore acquires the rcu_state structure's ->exp_wake_mutex and starts awakening any tasks waiting for this grace period. 5. One of the first tasks awakened happens to be Task A. Task A therefore releases the rcu_state structure's ->exp_mutex, which allows Task C to start the next expedited grace period, which causes the lower four bits of the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence field to become 0b'0101'. 6. Task C's expedited grace period completes, so that the lower four bits of the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence field now become 0b'1000'. 7. The kworker task from step 4 above continues its wakeups. Unfortunately, the wake_up_all() refetches the rcu_state structure's .expedited_sequence field: wake_up_all(&rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(rcu_state.expedited_sequence) & 0x3]); This results in the wakeup being applied to the rcu_node structure's ->exp_wq[2] field, which is unfortunate given that Task B is instead waiting on ->exp_wq[1]. On a busy system, no harm is done (or at least no permanent harm is done). Some later expedited grace period will redo the wakeup. But on a quiet system, such as many embedded systems, it might be a good long time before there was another expedited grace period. On such embedded systems, this situation could therefore result in a system hang. This issue manifested as DPM device timeout during suspend (which usually qualifies as a quiet time) due to a SCSI device being stuck in _synchronize_rcu_expedited(), with the following stack trace: schedule() synchronize_rcu_expedited() synchronize_rcu() scsi_device_quiesce() scsi_bus_suspend() dpm_run_callback() __device_suspend() This commit therefore prevents such delays, timeouts, and hangs by making rcu_exp_wait_wake() use its "s" argument consistently instead of refetching from rcu_state.expedited_sequence. Fixes: 3b5f668e715b ("rcu: Overlap wakeups with next expedited grace period") Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Substitute lookup for bit-twiddling in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus()Paul E. McKenney
The code in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus() calculates the current CPU's mask within its rcu_node structure's bitmasks, but this has already been computed in the ->grpmask field of that CPU's rcu_data structure. This commit therefore just uses this ->grpmask field. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Fix data-race due to atomic_t copy-by-valueMarco Elver
This fixes a data-race where `atomic_t dynticks` is copied by value. The copy is performed non-atomically, resulting in a data-race if `dynticks` is updated concurrently. This data-race was found with KCSAN: ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in dyntick_save_progress_counter / rcu_irq_enter write to 0xffff989dbdbe98e0 of 4 bytes by task 10 on cpu 3: atomic_add_return include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:78 [inline] rcu_dynticks_snap kernel/rcu/tree.c:310 [inline] dyntick_save_progress_counter+0x43/0x1b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:984 force_qs_rnp+0x183/0x200 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2286 rcu_gp_fqs kernel/rcu/tree.c:1601 [inline] rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x71/0x880 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1653 rcu_gp_kthread+0x22c/0x3b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1799 kthread+0x1b5/0x200 kernel/kthread.c:255 <snip> read to 0xffff989dbdbe98e0 of 4 bytes by task 154 on cpu 7: rcu_nmi_enter_common kernel/rcu/tree.c:828 [inline] rcu_irq_enter+0xda/0x240 kernel/rcu/tree.c:870 irq_enter+0x5/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:347 <snip> Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 7 PID: 154 Comm: kworker/7:1H Not tainted 5.3.0+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn ================================================================== Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09rcu: Avoid modifying mask_ofl_ipi in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus()Boqun Feng
The "mask_ofl_ipi" is used to track which CPUs get IPIed, however in the IPI sending loop, "mask_ofl_ipi" along with another variable "mask_ofl_test" might also get modified to record which CPUs' quiesent states must be reported by the sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus() at the end of sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(). This overlap of roles can be confusing, so this patch cleans things a little by using "mask_ofl_ipi" solely for determining which CPUs must be IPIed and "mask_ofl_test" for solely determining on behalf of which CPUs sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus() must report a quiscent state. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
2019-12-09rcu: Use *_ONCE() to protect lockless ->expmask accessesPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->expmask field is accessed locklessly when starting a new expedited grace period and when reporting an expedited RCU CPU stall warning. This commit therefore handles the former by taking a snapshot of ->expmask while the lock is held and the latter by applying READ_ONCE() to lockless reads and WRITE_ONCE() to the corresponding updates. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANpmjNNmSOagbTpffHr4=Yedckx9Rm2NuGqC9UqE+AOz5f1-ZQ@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+134336b86f728d6e55a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
2019-10-30Merge branches 'doc.2019.10.29a', 'fixes.2019.10.30a', 'nohz.2019.10.28a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'replace.2019.10.30a', 'torture.2019.10.05a' and 'lkmm.2019.10.05a' into HEAD doc.2019.10.29a: RCU documentation updates. fixes.2019.10.30a: RCU miscellaneous fixes. nohz.2019.10.28a: RCU NO_HZ and NO_HZ_FULL updates. replace.2019.10.30a: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace(). torture.2019.10.05a: RCU torture-test updates. lkmm.2019.10.05a: Linux kernel memory model updates.
2019-10-30rcu: Suppress levelspread uninitialized messagesPaul E. McKenney
New tools bring new warnings, and with v5.3 comes: kernel/rcu/srcutree.c: warning: 'levelspread[<U aa0>]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]: => 121:34 This commit suppresses this warning by initializing the full array to INT_MIN, which will result in failures should any out-of-bounds references appear. Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
2019-10-30rcu: Fix uninitialized variable in nocb_gp_wait()Dan Carpenter
We never set this to false. This probably doesn't affect most people's runtime because GCC will automatically initialize it to false at certain common optimization levels. But that behavior is related to a bug in GCC and obviously should not be relied on. Fixes: 5d6742b37727 ("rcu/nocb: Use rcu_segcblist for no-CBs CPUs") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-10-30rcu: Ensure that ->rcu_urgent_qs is set before resched IPIJoel Fernandes (Google)
The RCU-specific resched_cpu() function sends a resched IPI to the specified CPU, which can be used to force the tick on for a given nohz_full CPU. This is needed when this nohz_full CPU is looping in the kernel while blocking the current grace period. However, for the tick to actually be forced on in all cases, that CPU's rcu_data structure's ->rcu_urgent_qs flag must be set beforehand. This commit therefore causes rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs() to set this flag prior to invoking resched_cpu() on a holdout nohz_full CPU. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-10-30rcu: Several rcu_segcblist functions can be statickbuild test robot
None of rcu_segcblist_set_len(), rcu_segcblist_add_len(), or rcu_segcblist_xchg_len() are used outside of kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c. This commit therefore makes them static. Fixes: eda669a6a2c5 ("rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure") Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> [ paulmck: "Fixes:" updated per Stephen Rothwell feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-10-28rcu: Make kernel-mode nohz_full CPUs invoke the RCU core processingPaul E. McKenney
If a nohz_full CPU is idle or executing in userspace, it makes good sense to keep it out of RCU core processing. After all, the RCU grace-period kthread can see its quiescent states and all of its callbacks are offloaded, so there is nothing for RCU core processing to do. However, if a nohz_full CPU is executing in kernel space, the RCU grace-period kthread cannot do anything for it, so such a CPU must report its own quiescent states. This commit therefore makes nohz_full CPUs skip RCU core processing only if the scheduler-clock interrupt caught them in idle or in userspace. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>