summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/fair.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-04-25sched/numa: Fix a possible divide-by-zeroXie XiuQi
sched_clock_cpu() may not be consistent between CPUs. If a task migrates to another CPU, then se.exec_start is set to that CPU's rq_clock_task() by update_stats_curr_start(). Specifically, the new value might be before the old value due to clock skew. So then if in numa_get_avg_runtime() the expression: 'now - p->last_task_numa_placement' ends up as -1, then the divider '*period + 1' in task_numa_placement() is 0 and things go bang. Similar to update_curr(), check if time goes backwards to avoid this. [ peterz: Wrote new changelog. ] [ mingo: Tweaked the code comment. ] Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: cj.chengjian@huawei.com Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190425080016.GX11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-16sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockupPhil Auld
With extremely short cfs_period_us setting on a parent task group with a large number of children the for loop in sched_cfs_period_timer() can run until the watchdog fires. There is no guarantee that the call to hrtimer_forward_now() will ever return 0. The large number of children can make do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take longer than the period. NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 24 RIP: 0010:tg_nop+0x0/0x10 <IRQ> walk_tg_tree_from+0x29/0xb0 unthrottle_cfs_rq+0xe0/0x1a0 distribute_cfs_runtime+0xd3/0xf0 sched_cfs_period_timer+0xcb/0x160 ? sched_cfs_slack_timer+0xd0/0xd0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xfb/0x270 hrtimer_interrupt+0x122/0x270 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x140 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> To prevent this we add protection to the loop that detects when the loop has run too many times and scales the period and quota up, proportionally, so that the timer can complete before then next period expires. This preserves the relative runtime quota while preventing the hard lockup. A warning is issued reporting this state and the new values. Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190319130005.25492-1-pauld@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-03sched/fair: Do not re-read ->h_load_next during hierarchical load calculationMel Gorman
A NULL pointer dereference bug was reported on a distribution kernel but the same issue should be present on mainline kernel. It occured on s390 but should not be arch-specific. A partial oops looks like: Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space ... Call Trace: ... try_to_wake_up+0xfc/0x450 vhost_poll_wakeup+0x3a/0x50 [vhost] __wake_up_common+0xbc/0x178 __wake_up_common_lock+0x9e/0x160 __wake_up_sync_key+0x4e/0x60 sock_def_readable+0x5e/0x98 The bug hits any time between 1 hour to 3 days. The dereference occurs in update_cfs_rq_h_load when accumulating h_load. The problem is that cfq_rq->h_load_next is not protected by any locking and can be updated by parallel calls to task_h_load. Depending on the compiler, code may be generated that re-reads cfq_rq->h_load_next after the check for NULL and then oops when reading se->avg.load_avg. The dissassembly showed that it was possible to reread h_load_next after the check for NULL. While this does not appear to be an issue for later compilers, it's still an accident if the correct code is generated. Full locking in this path would have high overhead so this patch uses READ_ONCE to read h_load_next only once and check for NULL before dereferencing. It was confirmed that there were no further oops after 10 days of testing. As Peter pointed out, it is also necessary to use WRITE_ONCE() to avoid any potential problems with store tearing. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 685207963be9 ("sched: Move h_load calculation to task_h_load()") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190319123610.nsivgf3mjbjjesxb@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-24Merge branch 'sched-urgent-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Third more careful attempt for this set of fixes: - Prevent a 32bit math overflow in the cpufreq code - Fix a buffer overflow when scanning the cgroup2 cpu.max property - A set of fixes for the NOHZ scheduler logic to prevent waking up CPUs even if the capacity of the busy CPUs is sufficient along with other tweaks optimizing the behaviour for asymmetric systems (big/little)" * 'sched-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched/fair: Skip LLC NOHZ logic for asymmetric systems sched/fair: Tune down misfit NOHZ kicks sched/fair: Comment some nohz_balancer_kick() kick conditions sched/core: Fix buffer overflow in cgroup2 property cpu.max sched/cpufreq: Fix 32-bit math overflow
2019-03-19sched/fair: Skip LLC NOHZ logic for asymmetric systemsValentin Schneider
The LLC NOHZ condition will become true as soon as >=2 CPUs in a single LLC domain are busy. On big.LITTLE systems, this translates to two or more CPUs of a "cluster" (big or LITTLE) being busy. Issuing a NOHZ kick in these conditions isn't desired for asymmetric systems, as if the busy CPUs can provide enough compute capacity to the running tasks, then we can leave the NOHZ CPUs in peace. Skip the LLC NOHZ condition for asymmetric systems, and rely on nr_running & capacity checks to trigger NOHZ kicks when the system actually needs them. Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190211175946.4961-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-19sched/fair: Tune down misfit NOHZ kicksValentin Schneider
In this commit: 3b1baa6496e6 ("sched/fair: Add 'group_misfit_task' load-balance type") we set rq->misfit_task_load whenever the current running task has a utilization greater than 80% of rq->cpu_capacity. A non-zero value in this field enables misfit load balancing. However, if the task being looked at is already running on a CPU of highest capacity, there's nothing more we can do for it. We can currently spot this in update_sd_pick_busiest(), which prevents us from selecting a sched_group of group_type == group_misfit_task as the busiest group, but we don't do any of that in nohz_balancer_kick(). This means that we could repeatedly kick NOHZ CPUs when there's no improvements in terms of load balance to be done. Introduce a check_misfit_status() helper that returns true iff there is a CPU in the system that could give more CPU capacity to a rq's misfit task - IOW, there exists a CPU of higher capacity_orig or the rq's CPU is severely pressured by rt/IRQ. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190211175946.4961-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-19sched/fair: Comment some nohz_balancer_kick() kick conditionsValentin Schneider
We now have a comment explaining the first sched_domain based NOHZ kick, so might as well comment them all. While at it, unwrap a line that fits under 80 characters. Co-authored-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190211175946.4961-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-06Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds
Merge misc updates from Andrew Morton: - a few misc things - ocfs2 updates - most of MM * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (159 commits) tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-syscall.c: remove duplicate include proc: more robust bulk read test proc: test /proc/*/maps, smaps, smaps_rollup, statm proc: use seq_puts() everywhere proc: read kernel cpu stat pointer once proc: remove unused argument in proc_pid_lookup() fs/proc/thread_self.c: code cleanup for proc_setup_thread_self() fs/proc/self.c: code cleanup for proc_setup_self() proc: return exit code 4 for skipped tests mm,mremap: bail out earlier in mremap_to under map pressure mm/sparse: fix a bad comparison mm/memory.c: do_fault: avoid usage of stale vm_area_struct writeback: fix inode cgroup switching comment mm/huge_memory.c: fix "orig_pud" set but not used mm/hotplug: fix an imbalance with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC mm/memcontrol.c: fix bad line in comment mm/cma.c: cma_declare_contiguous: correct err handling mm/page_ext.c: fix an imbalance with kmemleak mm/compaction: pass pgdat to too_many_isolated() instead of zone mm: remove zone_lru_lock() function, access ->lru_lock directly ...
2019-03-05mm: replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODEAnshuman Khandual
Patch series "Replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE", v3. All these places for replacement were found by running the following grep patterns on the entire kernel code. Please let me know if this might have missed some instances. This might also have replaced some false positives. I will appreciate suggestions, inputs and review. 1. git grep "nid == -1" 2. git grep "node == -1" 3. git grep "nid = -1" 4. git grep "node = -1" This patch (of 2): At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is encoded as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to have macros in there. Replace these open encodings for an invalid node number with the global macro NUMA_NO_NODE. This helps remove NUMA related assumptions like 'invalid node' from various places redirecting them to a common definition. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545127933-10711-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> [ixgbe] Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> [mtip32xx] Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> [dmaengine.c] Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [powerpc] Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> [drivers/infiniband] Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-13sched/fair: Use non-atomic cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu()Viresh Kumar
The cpumasks updated here are not subject to concurrency and using atomic bitops for them is pointless and expensive. Use the non-atomic variants instead. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2e2a10f84b9049a81eef94ed6d5989447c21e34a.1549963617.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Remove unused 'sd' parameter from select_idle_smt()Viresh Kumar
The 'sd' parameter isn't getting used in select_idle_smt(), drop it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f91c5e118183e79d4a982e9ac4ce5e47948f6c1b.1549536337.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Prune, fix and simplify the nohz_balancer_kick() comment blockValentin Schneider
The comment block for that function lists the heuristics for triggering a nohz kick, but the most recent ones (blocked load updates, misfit) aren't included, and some of them (LLC nohz logic, asym packing) are no longer in sync with the code. The conditions are either simple enough or properly commented, so get rid of that list instead of letting it grow. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190117153411.2390-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Explain LLC nohz kick conditionValentin Schneider
Provide a comment explaining the LLC related nohz kick in nohz_balancer_kick(). Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190117153411.2390-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Simplify nohz_balancer_kick()Valentin Schneider
Calling 'nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq)' will always clear 'rq->cpu' from 'nohz.idle_cpus_mask' if it is set. Since it is called at the top of 'nohz_balancer_kick()', 'rq->cpu' will never be set in 'nohz.idle_cpus_mask' if it is accessed in the rest of the function. Combine the 'sched_domain_span()' with 'nohz.idle_cpus_mask' and drop the '(i == cpu)' check since 'rq->cpu' will never be iterated over. While at it, clean up a condition alignment. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190117153411.2390-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Simplify post_init_entity_util_avg() by calling it with a ↵Dietmar Eggemann
task_struct pointer argument Since commit: d03266910a53 ("sched/fair: Fix task group initialization") the utilization of a sched entity representing a task group is no longer initialized to any other value than 0. So post_init_entity_util_avg() is only used for tasks, not for sched_entities. Make this clear by calling it with a task_struct pointer argument which also eliminates the entity_is_task(se) if condition in the fork path and get rid of the stale comment in remove_entity_load_avg() accordingly. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190122162501.12000-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing pathVincent Guittot
This re-applies the commit reverted here: commit c40f7d74c741 ("sched/fair: Fix infinite loop in update_blocked_averages() by reverting a9e7f6544b9c") I.e. now that cfs_rq can be safely removed/added in the list, we can re-apply: commit a9e7f6544b9c ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in load balance path") Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: sargun@sargun.me Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com Cc: xiezhipeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549469662-13614-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()Vincent Guittot
Removing a cfs_rq from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list can break the parent/child ordering of the list when it will be added back. In order to remove an empty and fully decayed cfs_rq, we must remove its children too, so they will be added back in the right order next time. With a normal decay of PELT, a parent will be empty and fully decayed if all children are empty and fully decayed too. In such a case, we just have to ensure that the whole branch will be added when a new task is enqueued. This is default behavior since : commit f6783319737f ("sched/fair: Fix insertion in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list") In case of throttling, the PELT of throttled cfs_rq will not be updated whereas the parent will. This breaks the assumption made above unless we remove the children of a cfs_rq that is throttled. Then, they will be added back when unthrottled and a sched_entity will be enqueued. As throttled cfs_rq are now removed from the list, we can remove the associated test in update_blocked_averages(). Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: sargun@sargun.me Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com Cc: xiezhipeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549469662-13614-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-11Merge tag 'v5.0-rc6' into sched/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/fair: Fix insertion in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_listVincent Guittot
Sargun reported a crash: "I picked up c40f7d74c741a907cfaeb73a7697081881c497d0 sched/fair: Fix infinite loop in update_blocked_averages() by reverting a9e7f6544b9c and put it on top of 4.19.13. In addition to this, I uninlined list_add_leaf_cfs_rq for debugging. This revealed a new bug that we didn't get to because we kept getting crashes from the previous issue. When we are running with cgroups that are rapidly changing, with CFS bandwidth control, and in addition using the cpusets cgroup, we see this crash. Specifically, it seems to occur with cgroups that are throttled and we change the allowed cpuset." The algorithm used to order cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list assumes that it will walk down to root the 1st time a cfs_rq is used and we will finish to add either a cfs_rq without parent or a cfs_rq with a parent that is already on the list. But this is not always true in presence of throttling. Because a cfs_rq can be throttled even if it has never been used but other CPUs of the cgroup have already used all the bandwdith, we are not sure to go down to the root and add all cfs_rq in the list. Ensure that all cfs_rq will be added in the list even if they are throttled. [ mingo: Fix !CGROUPS build. ] Reported-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: tj@kernel.org Fixes: 9c2791f936ef ("Fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548825767-10799-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/fair: Add tmp_alone_branch assertionPeter Zijlstra
The magic in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() requires that at the end of enqueue_task_fair(): rq->tmp_alone_branch == &rq->lead_cfs_rq_list If this is violated, list integrity is compromised for list entries and the tmp_alone_branch pointer might dangle. Also, reflow list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() while there. This looses one indentation level and generates a form that's convenient for the next patch. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/pelt: Skip updating util_est when utilization is higher than CPU's ↵Vincent Guittot
capacity util_est is mainly meant to be a lower-bound for tasks utilization. That's why task_util_est() returns the actual util_avg when it's higher than the estimated utilization. With new invaraince signal and without any special check on samples collection, if a task is limited because of thermal capping for example, we could end up overestimating its utilization and thus perhaps generating an unwanted frequency spike when the capping is relaxed... and (even worst) it will take some more activations for the estimated utilization to converge back to the actual utilization. Since we cannot easily know if there is idle time in a CPU when a task completes an activation with a utilization higher then the CPU capacity, we skip the sampling when utilization is higher than CPU's capacity. Suggested-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548257214-13745-4-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/fair: Update scale invariance of PELTVincent Guittot
The current implementation of load tracking invariance scales the contribution with current frequency and uarch performance (only for utilization) of the CPU. One main result of this formula is that the figures are capped by current capacity of CPU. Another one is that the load_avg is not invariant because not scaled with uarch. The util_avg of a periodic task that runs r time slots every p time slots varies in the range : U * (1-y^r)/(1-y^p) * y^i < Utilization < U * (1-y^r)/(1-y^p) with U is the max util_avg value = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE At a lower capacity, the range becomes: U * C * (1-y^r')/(1-y^p) * y^i' < Utilization < U * C * (1-y^r')/(1-y^p) with C reflecting the compute capacity ratio between current capacity and max capacity. so C tries to compensate changes in (1-y^r') but it can't be accurate. Instead of scaling the contribution value of PELT algo, we should scale the running time. The PELT signal aims to track the amount of computation of tasks and/or rq so it seems more correct to scale the running time to reflect the effective amount of computation done since the last update. In order to be fully invariant, we need to apply the same amount of running time and idle time whatever the current capacity. Because running at lower capacity implies that the task will run longer, we have to ensure that the same amount of idle time will be applied when system becomes idle and no idle time has been "stolen". But reaching the maximum utilization value (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) means that the task is seen as an always-running task whatever the capacity of the CPU (even at max compute capacity). In this case, we can discard this "stolen" idle times which becomes meaningless. In order to achieve this time scaling, a new clock_pelt is created per rq. The increase of this clock scales with current capacity when something is running on rq and synchronizes with clock_task when rq is idle. With this mechanism, we ensure the same running and idle time whatever the current capacity. This also enables to simplify the pelt algorithm by removing all references of uarch and frequency and applying the same contribution to utilization and loads. Furthermore, the scaling is done only once per update of clock (update_rq_clock_task()) instead of during each update of sched_entities and cfs/rt/dl_rq of the rq like the current implementation. This is interesting when cgroup are involved as shown in the results below: On a hikey (octo Arm64 platform). Performance cpufreq governor and only shallowest c-state to remove variance generated by those power features so we only track the impact of pelt algo. each test runs 16 times: ./perf bench sched pipe (higher is better) kernel tip/sched/core + patch ops/seconds ops/seconds diff cgroup root 59652(+/- 0.18%) 59876(+/- 0.24%) +0.38% level1 55608(+/- 0.27%) 55923(+/- 0.24%) +0.57% level2 52115(+/- 0.29%) 52564(+/- 0.22%) +0.86% hackbench -l 1000 (lower is better) kernel tip/sched/core + patch duration(sec) duration(sec) diff cgroup root 4.453(+/- 2.37%) 4.383(+/- 2.88%) -1.57% level1 4.859(+/- 8.50%) 4.830(+/- 7.07%) -0.60% level2 5.063(+/- 9.83%) 4.928(+/- 9.66%) -2.66% Then, the responsiveness of PELT is improved when CPU is not running at max capacity with this new algorithm. I have put below some examples of duration to reach some typical load values according to the capacity of the CPU with current implementation and with this patch. These values has been computed based on the geometric series and the half period value: Util (%) max capacity half capacity(mainline) half capacity(w/ patch) 972 (95%) 138ms not reachable 276ms 486 (47.5%) 30ms 138ms 60ms 256 (25%) 13ms 32ms 26ms On my hikey (octo Arm64 platform) with schedutil governor, the time to reach max OPP when starting from a null utilization, decreases from 223ms with current scale invariance down to 121ms with the new algorithm. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548257214-13745-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/fair: Move the rq_of() helper functionVincent Guittot
Move rq_of() helper function so it can be used in pelt.c [ mingo: Improve readability while at it. ] Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548257214-13745-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04sched/fair: Convert numa_group.refcount to refcount_tElena Reshetova
atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference counters with the following properties: - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set() - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero - once counter reaches zero, its further increments aren't allowed - counter schema uses basic atomic operations (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.) Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable. The variable numa_group.refcount is used as pure reference counter. Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations. ** Important note for maintainers: Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic counterparts. The full comparison can be seen in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon in state to be merged to the documentation tree. Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in some rare cases it might matter. Please double check that you don't have some undocumented memory guarantees for this variable usage. For the numa_group.refcount it might make a difference in following places: - get_numa_group(): increment in refcount_inc_not_zero() only guarantees control dependency on success vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart - put_numa_group(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547814450-18902-4-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-30cpu/hotplug: Fix "SMT disabled by BIOS" detection for KVMJosh Poimboeuf
With the following commit: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") ... the hotplug code attempted to detect when SMT was disabled by BIOS, in which case it reported SMT as permanently disabled. However, that code broke a virt hotplug scenario, where the guest is booted with only primary CPU threads, and a sibling is brought online later. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be a way to reliably distinguish between the HW "SMT disabled by BIOS" case and the virt "sibling not yet brought online" case. So the above-mentioned commit was a bit misguided, as it permanently disabled SMT for both cases, preventing future virt sibling hotplugs. Going back and reviewing the original problems which were attempted to be solved by that commit, when SMT was disabled in BIOS: 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control showed "on" instead of "notsupported"; and 2) vmx_vm_init() was incorrectly showing the L1TF_MSG_SMT warning. I'd propose that we instead consider #1 above to not actually be a problem. Because, at least in the virt case, it's possible that SMT wasn't disabled by BIOS and a sibling thread could be brought online later. So it makes sense to just always default the smt control to "on" to allow for that possibility (assuming cpuid indicates that the CPU supports SMT). The real problem is #2, which has a simple fix: change vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- i.e., whether any siblings are currently online -- instead of looking at the SMT "control" sysfs value. So fix it by: a) reverting the original "fix" and its followup fix: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") bc2d8d262cba ("cpu/hotplug: Fix SMT supported evaluation") and b) changing vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- instead of the sysfs control value -- to determine whether the L1TF warning is needed. This also requires the 'sched_smt_present' variable to exported, instead of 'cpu_smt_control'. Fixes: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e3a85d585da28cc333ecbc1e78ee9216e6da9396.1548794349.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
2019-01-27sched/fair: Fix unnecessary increase of balance intervalVincent Guittot
In case of active balancing, we increase the balance interval to cover pinned tasks cases not covered by all_pinned logic. Neverthless, the active migration triggered by asym packing should be treated as the normal unbalanced case and reset the interval to default value, otherwise active migration for asym_packing can be easily delayed for hundreds of ms because of this pinned task detection mechanism. The same happens to other conditions tested in need_active_balance() like misfit task and when the capacity of src_cpu is reduced compared to dst_cpu (see comments in need_active_balance() for details). Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-27sched/fair: Fix rounding bug for asym packingVincent Guittot
When check_asym_packing() is triggered, the imbalance is set to: busiest_stat.avg_load * busiest_stat.group_capacity / SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE But busiest_stat.avg_load equals: sgs->group_load * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / sgs->group_capacity These divisions can generate a rounding that will make imbalance slightly lower than the weighted load of the cfs_rq. But this is enough to skip the rq in find_busiest_queue() and prevents asym migration from happening. Directly set imbalance to busiest's sgs->group_load to remove the rounding. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-27sched/fair: Trigger asym_packing during idle load balanceVincent Guittot
Newly idle load balancing is not always triggered when a CPU becomes idle. This prevents the scheduler from getting a chance to migrate the task for asym packing. Enable active migration during idle load balance too. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-27sched/fair: Robustify CFS-bandwidth timer lockingPeter Zijlstra
Traditionally hrtimer callbacks were run with IRQs disabled, but with the introduction of HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT it is possible they run from SoftIRQ context, which does _NOT_ have IRQs disabled. Allow for the CFS bandwidth timers (period_timer and slack_timer) to be ran from SoftIRQ context; this entails removing the assumption that IRQs are already disabled from the locking. While mainline doesn't strictly need this, -RT forces all timers not explicitly marked with MODE_HARD into MODE_SOFT and trips over this. And marking these timers as MODE_HARD doesn't make sense as they're not required for RT operation and can potentially be quite expensive. Reported-by: Tom Putzeys <tom.putzeys@be.atlascopco.com> Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190107125231.GE14122@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-27sched/core: Give DCE a fighting chancePeter Zijlstra
All that fancy new Energy-Aware scheduling foo is hidden behind a static_key, which is awesome if you have the stuff enabled in your config. However, when you lack all the prerequisites it doesn't make any sense to pretend we'll ever actually run this, so provide a little more clue to the compiler so it can more agressively delete the code. text data bss dec hex filename 50297 976 96 51369 c8a9 defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o 49227 944 96 50267 c45b defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-06jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to KconfigMasahiro Yamada
Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label". The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined like this: #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL #endif We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO. Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will match to the real kernel capability. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
2018-12-30sched/fair: Fix infinite loop in update_blocked_averages() by reverting ↵Linus Torvalds
a9e7f6544b9c Zhipeng Xie, Xie XiuQi and Sargun Dhillon reported lockups in the scheduler under high loads, starting at around the v4.18 time frame, and Zhipeng Xie tracked it down to bugs in the rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list manipulation. Do a (manual) revert of: a9e7f6544b9c ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in load balance path") It turns out that the list_del_leaf_cfs_rq() introduced by this commit is a surprising property that was not considered in followup commits such as: 9c2791f936ef ("sched/fair: Fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list") As Vincent Guittot explains: "I think that there is a bigger problem with commit a9e7f6544b9c and cfs_rq throttling: Let take the example of the following topology TG2 --> TG1 --> root: 1) The 1st time a task is enqueued, we will add TG2 cfs_rq then TG1 cfs_rq to leaf_cfs_rq_list and we are sure to do the whole branch in one path because it has never been used and can't be throttled so tmp_alone_branch will point to leaf_cfs_rq_list at the end. 2) Then TG1 is throttled 3) and we add TG3 as a new child of TG1. 4) The 1st enqueue of a task on TG3 will add TG3 cfs_rq just before TG1 cfs_rq and tmp_alone_branch will stay on rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. With commit a9e7f6544b9c, we can del a cfs_rq from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. So if the load of TG1 cfs_rq becomes NULL before step 2) above, TG1 cfs_rq is removed from the list. Then at step 4), TG3 cfs_rq is added at the beginning of rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list but tmp_alone_branch still points to TG3 cfs_rq because its throttled parent can't be enqueued when the lock is released. tmp_alone_branch doesn't point to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list whereas it should. So if TG3 cfs_rq is removed or destroyed before tmp_alone_branch points on another TG cfs_rq, the next TG cfs_rq that will be added, will be linked outside rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list - which is bad. In addition, we can break the ordering of the cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list but this ordering is used to update and propagate the update from leaf down to root." Instead of trying to work through all these cases and trying to reproduce the very high loads that produced the lockup to begin with, simplify the code temporarily by reverting a9e7f6544b9c - which change was clearly not thought through completely. This (hopefully) gives us a kernel that doesn't lock up so people can continue to enjoy their holidays without worrying about regressions. ;-) [ mingo: Wrote changelog, fixed weird spelling in code comment while at it. ] Analyzed-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Analyzed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reported-by: Zhipeng Xie <xiezhipeng1@huawei.com> Reported-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Tested-by: Zhipeng Xie <xiezhipeng1@huawei.com> Tested-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.13+ Cc: Bin Li <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: a9e7f6544b9c ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in load balance path") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545879866-27809-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-27sched/fair: Fix warning on non-SMP buildOlof Johansson
Caused by making the variable static: kernel/sched/fair.c:119:21: warning: 'capacity_margin' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] Seems easiest to just move it up under the existing ifdef CONFIG_SMP that's a few lines above. Fixes: ed8885a14433a ('sched/fair: Make some variables static') Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-26Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle were: - Introduce "Energy Aware Scheduling" - by Quentin Perret. This is a coherent topology description of CPUs in cooperation with the PM subsystem, with the goal to schedule more energy-efficiently on asymetric SMP platform - such as waking up tasks to the more energy-efficient CPUs first, as long as the system isn't oversubscribed. For details of the design, see: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180724122521.22109-1-quentin.perret@arm.com/ - Misc cleanups and smaller enhancements" * 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (23 commits) sched/fair: Select an energy-efficient CPU on task wake-up sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation helper function sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator sched/fair: Clean-up update_sg_lb_stats parameters sched/toplogy: Introduce the 'sched_energy_present' static key sched/topology: Make Energy Aware Scheduling depend on schedutil sched/topology: Disable EAS on inappropriate platforms sched/topology: Add lowest CPU asymmetry sched_domain level pointer sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of CPUs when available PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework sched/cpufreq: Prepare schedutil for Energy Aware Scheduling sched/topology: Relocate arch_scale_cpu_capacity() to the internal header sched/core: Remove unnecessary unlikely() in push_*_task() sched/topology: Remove the ::smt_gain field from 'struct sched_domain' sched: Fix various typos in comments sched/core: Clean up the #ifdef block in add_nr_running() sched/fair: Make some variables static sched/core: Create task_has_idle_policy() helper sched/fair: Add lsub_positive() and use it consistently sched/fair: Mask UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED usages ...
2018-12-11sched/fair: Select an energy-efficient CPU on task wake-upQuentin Perret
If an Energy Model (EM) is available and if the system isn't overutilized, re-route waking tasks into an energy-aware placement algorithm. The selection of an energy-efficient CPU for a task is achieved by estimating the impact on system-level active energy resulting from the placement of the task on the CPU with the highest spare capacity in each performance domain. This strategy spreads tasks in a performance domain and avoids overly aggressive task packing. The best CPU energy-wise is then selected if it saves a large enough amount of energy with respect to prev_cpu. Although it has already shown significant benefits on some existing targets, this approach cannot scale to platforms with numerous CPUs. This is an attempt to do something useful as writing a fast heuristic that performs reasonably well on a broad spectrum of architectures isn't an easy task. As such, the scope of usability of the energy-aware wake-up path is restricted to systems with the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag set, and where the EM isn't too complex. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: currojerez@riseup.net Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org Cc: smuckle@google.com Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Cc: tkjos@google.com Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-15-quentin.perret@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation helper functionQuentin Perret
In preparation for the definition of an energy-aware wakeup path, introduce a helper function to estimate the consequence on system energy when a specific task wakes-up on a specific CPU. compute_energy() estimates the capacity state to be reached by all performance domains and estimates the consumption of each online CPU according to its Energy Model and its percentage of busy time. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: currojerez@riseup.net Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org Cc: smuckle@google.com Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Cc: tkjos@google.com Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-14-quentin.perret@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicatorMorten Rasmussen
Energy-aware scheduling is only meant to be active while the system is _not_ over-utilized. That is, there are spare cycles available to shift tasks around based on their actual utilization to get a more energy-efficient task distribution without depriving any tasks. When above the tipping point task placement is done the traditional way based on load_avg, spreading the tasks across as many cpus as possible based on priority scaled load to preserve smp_nice. Below the tipping point we want to use util_avg instead. We need to define a criteria for when we make the switch. The util_avg for each cpu converges towards 100% regardless of how many additional tasks we may put on it. If we define over-utilized as: sum_{cpus}(rq.cfs.avg.util_avg) + margin > sum_{cpus}(rq.capacity) some individual cpus may be over-utilized running multiple tasks even when the above condition is false. That should be okay as long as we try to spread the tasks out to avoid per-cpu over-utilization as much as possible and if all tasks have the _same_ priority. If the latter isn't true, we have to consider priority to preserve smp_nice. For example, we could have n_cpus nice=-10 util_avg=55% tasks and n_cpus/2 nice=0 util_avg=60% tasks. Balancing based on util_avg we are likely to end up with nice=-10 tasks sharing cpus and nice=0 tasks getting their own as we 1.5*n_cpus tasks in total and 55%+55% is less over-utilized than 55%+60% for those cpus that have to be shared. The system utilization is only 85% of the system capacity, but we are breaking smp_nice. To be sure not to break smp_nice, we have defined over-utilization conservatively as when any cpu in the system is fully utilized at its highest frequency instead: cpu_rq(any).cfs.avg.util_avg + margin > cpu_rq(any).capacity IOW, as soon as one cpu is (nearly) 100% utilized, we switch to load_avg to factor in priority to preserve smp_nice. With this definition, we can skip periodic load-balance as no cpu has an always-running task when the system is not over-utilized. All tasks will be periodic and we can balance them at wake-up. This conservative condition does however mean that some scenarios that could benefit from energy-aware decisions even if one cpu is fully utilized would not get those benefits. For systems where some cpus might have reduced capacity on some cpus (RT-pressure and/or big.LITTLE), we want periodic load-balance checks as soon a just a single cpu is fully utilized as it might one of those with reduced capacity and in that case we want to migrate it. [ peterz: Added a comment explaining why new tasks are not accounted during overutilization detection. ] Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: currojerez@riseup.net Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org Cc: smuckle@google.com Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Cc: tkjos@google.com Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-13-quentin.perret@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11sched/fair: Clean-up update_sg_lb_stats parametersQuentin Perret
In preparation for the introduction of a new root domain flag which can be set during load balance (the 'overutilized' flag), clean-up the set of parameters passed to update_sg_lb_stats(). More specifically, the 'local_group' and 'local_idx' parameters can be removed since they can easily be reconstructed from within the function. While at it, transform the 'overload' parameter into a flag stored in the 'sg_status' parameter hence facilitating the definition of new flags when needed. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: currojerez@riseup.net Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org Cc: smuckle@google.com Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Cc: tkjos@google.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-12-quentin.perret@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11sched/topology: Add lowest CPU asymmetry sched_domain level pointerQuentin Perret
Add another member to the family of per-cpu sched_domain shortcut pointers. This one, sd_asym_cpucapacity, points to the lowest level at which the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag is set. While at it, rename the sd_asym shortcut to sd_asym_packing to avoid confusions. Generally speaking, the largest opportunity to save energy via scheduling comes from a smarter exploitation of heterogeneous platforms (i.e. big.LITTLE). Consequently, the sd_asym_cpucapacity shortcut will be used at first as the lowest domain where Energy-Aware Scheduling (EAS) should be applied. For example, it is possible to apply EAS within a socket on a multi-socket system, as long as each socket has an asymmetric topology. Energy-aware cross-sockets wake-up balancing will only happen when the system is over-utilized, or this_cpu and prev_cpu are in different sockets. Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: adharmap@codeaurora.org Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: currojerez@riseup.net Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: javi.merino@kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: pkondeti@codeaurora.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: skannan@codeaurora.org Cc: smuckle@google.com Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Cc: thara.gopinath@linaro.org Cc: tkjos@google.com Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-7-quentin.perret@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11sched/fair: Clean up comment in nohz_idle_balance()Andrea Parri
Concerning the comment associated to the atomic_fetch_andnot() in nohz_idle_balance(), Vincent explains [1]: "[...] the comment is useless and can be removed [...] it was referring to a line code above the comment that was present in a previous iteration of the patchset. This line disappeared in final version but the comment has stayed." So remove the comment. Vincent also points out that the full ordering associated to the atomic_fetch_andnot() primitive could be relaxed, but this patch insists on the current more conservative/fully ordered solution: "Performance" isn't a concern, stay away from "correctness"/subtle relaxed (re)ordering if possible..., just make sure not to confuse the next reader with misleading/out-of-date comments. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAKfTPtBjA-oCBRkO6__npQwL3+HLjzk7riCcPU1R7YdO-EpuZg@mail.gmail.com Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127110110.5533-1-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-03sched: Fix various typos in commentsIngo Molnar
Go over the scheduler source code and fix common typos in comments - and a typo in an actual variable name. No change in functionality intended. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12sched/fair: Make some variables staticMuchun Song
The variables are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181110075202.61172-1-smuchun@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12sched/core: Create task_has_idle_policy() helperViresh Kumar
We already have task_has_rt_policy() and task_has_dl_policy() helpers, create task_has_idle_policy() as well and update sched core to start using it. While at it, use task_has_dl_policy() at one more place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ce3915d5b490fc81af926a3b6bfb775e7188e005.1541416894.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12sched/fair: Add lsub_positive() and use it consistentlyPatrick Bellasi
The following pattern: var -= min_t(typeof(var), var, val); is used multiple times in fair.c. The existing sub_positive() already captures that pattern, but it also adds an explicit load-store to properly support lockless observations. In other cases the pattern above is used to update local, and/or not concurrently accessed, variables. Let's add a simpler version of sub_positive(), targeted at local variables updates, which gives the same readability benefits at calling sites, without enforcing {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() barriers. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181031184527.GA3178@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12sched/fair: Mask UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED usagesPatrick Bellasi
The _task_util_est() is mainly used to add/remove the task contribution to/from the rq's estimated utilization at task enqueue/dequeue time. In both cases we ensure the UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED flag is set to keep consistency between enqueue and dequeue time while still being transparent to update_load_avg calls which will eventually reset the flag. Let's move the flag forcing within _task_util_est() itself so that we can simplify calling code by hiding that estimated utilization implementation detail into one of its internal functions. This will affect also the "public" API task_util_est() but we know that the flag will (eventually) impact just on the LSB of the estimated utilization, thus it's certainly acceptable. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105145400.935-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up dependent fixesIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-12sched/fair: Fix cpu_util_wake() for 'execl' type workloadsPatrick Bellasi
A ~10% regression has been reported for UnixBench's execl throughput test by Aaron Lu and Ye Xiaolong: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/30/765 That test is pretty simple, it does a "recursive" execve() syscall on the same binary. Starting from the syscall, this sequence is possible: do_execve() do_execveat_common() __do_execve_file() sched_exec() select_task_rq_fair() <==| Task already enqueued find_idlest_cpu() find_idlest_group() capacity_spare_wake() <==| Functions not called from cpu_util_wake() | the wakeup path which means we can end up calling cpu_util_wake() not only from the "wakeup path", as its name would suggest. Indeed, the task doing an execve() syscall is already enqueued on the CPU we want to get the cpu_util_wake() for. The estimated utilization for a CPU computed in cpu_util_wake() was written under the assumption that function can be called only from the wakeup path. If instead the task is already enqueued, we end up with a utilization which does not remove the current task's contribution from the estimated utilization of the CPU. This will wrongly assume a reduced spare capacity on the current CPU and increase the chances to migrate the task on execve. The regression is tracked down to: commit d519329f72a6 ("sched/fair: Update util_est only on util_avg updates") because in that patch we turn on by default the UTIL_EST sched feature. However, the real issue is introduced by: commit f9be3e5961c5 ("sched/fair: Use util_est in LB and WU paths") Let's fix this by ensuring to always discount the task estimated utilization from the CPU's estimated utilization when the task is also the current one. The same benchmark of the bug report, executed on a dual socket 40 CPUs Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz machine, reports these "Execl Throughput" figures (higher the better): mainline : 48136.5 lps mainline+fix : 55376.5 lps which correspond to a 15% speedup. Moreover, since {cpu_util,capacity_spare}_wake() are not really only used from the wakeup path, let's remove this ambiguity by using a better matching name: {cpu_util,capacity_spare}_without(). Since we are at that, let's also improve the existing documentation. Reported-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Reported-by: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Fixes: f9be3e5961c5 (sched/fair: Use util_est in LB and WU paths) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181025093100.GB13236@e110439-lin/ Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-05sched/fair: Fix a comment in task_numa_fault()Yi Wang
Duplicated 'case it'. Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Xi Xu <xu.xi8@zte.com.cn> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541379013-11352-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-04sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balanceValentin Schneider
When load_balance() fails to move some load because of task affinity, we end up increasing sd->balance_interval to delay the next periodic balance in the hopes that next time we look, that annoying pinned task(s) will be gone. However, idle_balance() pays no attention to sd->balance_interval, yet it will still lead to an increase in balance_interval in case of pinned tasks. If we're going through several newidle balances (e.g. we have a periodic task), this can lead to a huge increase of the balance_interval in a very small amount of time. To prevent that, don't increase the balance interval when going through a newidle balance. This is a similar approach to what is done in commit 58b26c4c0257 ("sched: Increment cache_nice_tries only on periodic lb"), where we disregard newidle balance and rely on periodic balance for more stable results. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-2-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-04sched/fair: Clean up load_balance() conditionValentin Schneider
The alignment of the condition is off, clean that up. Also, logical operators have lower precedence than bitwise/relational operators, so remove one layer of parentheses to make the condition a bit simpler to follow. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-1-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>